Incorporating Social Objectives in Evaluating Sustainable Fisheries Harvest Strategy

  • Jiafeng Wu
  • Na Wang
  • Zhi-Hua Hu
  • Zhenjie HongEmail author
  • You-Gan WangEmail author


Fisheries management must take account of environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social benefits generated by the public resources. The traditional approach of maximum economic yield (MEY), however, is yet to consider social objectives in deriving quantitative quotes. Current MEY evaluation framework would be appropriate if the economic rent was distributed back to the public. If public resources are privatized as corporations, the rent largely flows to the owners of large capital in the fishing industry. This is in stark contrast to the aims of benefiting the community as a whole. In this short paper, we promote a socially responsible framework in decision-making of fisheries management. This approach is beyond the fleet-based MEY approach, for it incorporates fleet profitability, chain profitability, employment, environmental concerns, and broad social benefits, in strict accordance with stock sustainability. Recognizing the needs of fishers, as well as the interests of chain sectors and the broader community, is a vital part of ensuring responsible fishery management and a viable future for Australian fisheries. The established framework will provide open view scenarios and enrich the MEY approaches in fisheries management.


Fisheries Value chain Maximum economic yield Social responsibility Social benefits and impacts 



  1. 1.
    DAFF. (2007). Commonwealth fisheries harvest strategy: policy and guidelines. Canberra: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pascoe, S., Dichmont, C. M., Brooks, K., Pears, R., & Jebreen, E. (2013). Management objectives of Queensland fisheries: putting the horse before the cart. Marine Policy, 37, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pascoe, S., Brooks, K., Cannard, T., Dichmont, C. M., Jebreen, E., Schirmer, J., & Triantafillos, L. (2014). Social objectives of fisheries management: what are managers’ priorities? Ocean and Coastal Management, 98, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks, K., Schirmer, J., Pascoe, S., Triantafillos, L., Jebreen, E., Cannard, T., & Dichmont, C. M. (2015). Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management. Marine Policy, 53, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, Y. G., & Die, D. (1996). Stock-recruitment relationships of the tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus) in the Australian northern prawn fishery. Marine and Freshwater Research, 47(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Somers, I., & Wang, Y. G. (1997). A simulation model for evaluating seasonal closures in Australia’s multispecies northern prawn fishery. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 17(1), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, Y. G., & Wang, N. (2013). Rejoinder to Pascoe et al.’s (2013) comment paper. Fisheries, 38(11), 509–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bromley, D. W. (2009). Abdicating responsibility: the deceits of fisheries policy. Fisheries, 34, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christensen, V. (2010). MEY = MSY. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sumaila, U. R., & Hannesson, R. (2010). Maximum economic yield in crisis? Fish and Fisheries, 11, 461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pascoe, S., Kahui, V., Hutton, T., & Dichmont, C. (2016). Experiences with the use of bioeconomic models in the management of Australian and New Zealand fisheries. Fisheries Research, 183, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grafton, Q., Adamowicz, W., Dupont, D., Nelson, H., Hill, R. J., & Renzetti, S. (2008). The economics of the environment and natural resources. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsieh, C., Reiss, C. H., et al. (2006). Fishing elevates variability in the abundance of exploited species. Nature, 443, 859–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beddington, J. R., & May, R. M. (1977). Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment. Science, 197, 463–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    May, R., Beddington, J. R., et al. (1978). Exploiting natural populations in an uncertain world. Mathematical Biosciences, 42, 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hutchings, J. A. (2000). Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature, 406, 882–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ye, Y., Cochrane, K., et al. (2012). Rebuilding global fisheries: the World Summit Goal, costs and benefits. Fish and Fisheries, 14(2), 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied MathematicsNanjing University of Finance and EconomicsNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Mathematical Sciences, Science and Engineering FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Logistics Research CenterShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.College of Mathematics and PhysicsWenzhou UniversityWenzhouChina

Personalised recommendations