Advertisement

Environmental Modeling & Assessment

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 605–623 | Cite as

Cover Crops and Water Quality

  • Elsa MartinEmail author
Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

This work deals with the regulation of water pollution caused by the use of nitrogen in agriculture. We investigate the policy instruments that should be implemented to induce socially optimal water quality. To do so, we propose a dynamic theoretical framework. We focus on the potential of cover crops to preserve water quality by considering the impact of soil quality on water quality to be endogenous: we consider two interrelated dynamic equations, one for soil quality and one for water pollution, that interact through soil quality. The land area devoted to cover crops increases the soil quality stock which, in turn, decreases the water pollution stock. We show that the socially optimal fiscal scheme consists in two parts: one that acts at the intensive margin (proportional to nitrogen use) and one at the extensive margin (proportional to land cultivated with cover crops).

Keywords

Water quality Nitrate Soil quality Land-use tax Cover crop 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Amundson, R., & et al. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348(6235), 647–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burt, O.R. (1981). Farm level economics of soil conservation in the palouse area of the northwest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conrad, J.M., & Olson, L.J. (1992). The economics of stock pollutant: Aldicarb on Long Island. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Council of the European Communities. (1991). Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cumming, R. (1971). Optimum exploitation of groundwater reserves with saltwater intrusion. Water Resources Research, 7(6), 1415–14A23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dockner, E. (1985). Local stability analysis in optimal control problems with two state variables. In Feichtinger, G. (Ed.) Optimal control theory and economic analysis 2 (pp. 89–103). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goetz, R.U., & Zilberman, D. (1995). Mining the soil: agricultural production system on peatland. Environmental and Resource Economics, 6, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goetz, R.U. (1997). Diversification in agricultural production: a dynamic model of optimal cropping to manage soil erosion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goetz, R.U., & et al. (2006). Determining the economic gains from regulation at the extensive and intensive margins. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hediger, W. (2003). Sustainable farm income in the presence of soil erosion: an agricultural Hartwick rule. Ecological Economics, 45, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jayet, P.-A., & Petsakos, A. (2013). Evaluating the efficiency of a uniform N-input tax under different policy scenarios at different scales. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 18, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Justes, E. (2017). Cover crops for sustainable farming. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaspar, T.C., & Singer, J.W. (2011). The use of cover crops to manage soil. In Hatfild, J.L., & Sauer, T.J. (Eds.) Soil management: building a stable base for agriculture. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kling, C.L., & et al. (2014). LUMINATE: Linking agricultural land use, local water quality and Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(3), 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langyintuo, A.S., & et al. (2005). Yield and income risk-efficiency analysis of alternative systems for rice production in the Guinea Savannah of Northern Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 32, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Legras, S. (2010). Managing correlated stock externalities: water taxes with a pinch of salt. Environment and Development Economics, 15(3), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Léonard, D., & Van Long, N. (1998). Optimal control theory and static optimization in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lichtenberg, E. (1989). Land quality, irrigation development and cropping patterns in the Northern High Plains. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loehman, E.T., & Randhir, T.O. (1999). Alleviating soil erosion/pollution stock externalities: alternative roles for government. Ecological Economics, 30, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McConnell, K. (1983). An economic model of soil conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phaneuf, D.J., & Requate, T. (2017). A course in environmental economics - theory, policy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roseta-Palma, C. (2002). Groundwater management when water quality is endogenous. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schipanski, M.E., & et al. (2014). A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 125, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sutton, M., & et al. (2011). The european nitrogen assessment: sources, effects and policy perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xabadia, A., & et al. (2008). The gains from differentiated policies to control stock pollution when producers are heterogeneous. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(4), 1059–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xepapadeas, A. (1996). Quantity and quality management of groundwater: an application to irrigated agriculture in Iraklion, Crete. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 1, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yadav, S.N. (1997). Dynamic optimization of nitrogen use when groundwater contamination is internalized at the standard in the long run. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), 31–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zeitouni, N., & Dinar, A. (1997). Mitigating negative water quality and quality externalities by joint management of adjacent aquifers. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CESAER, AgroSup Dijon, INRAUniv. Bourgogne Franche-ComtéDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations