Advertisement

Green supplier evaluation with SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors

  • Serap AkcanEmail author
  • Mehmet Ali Taş
Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

One of the most important agendas of the world is the topic of global warming. In order to protect the ecological balance, all organizations turning towards using natural resources more effectively and not harming the environment. Increasing social expectation, legal regulations, and diminishing natural resources necessitate the dissemination of these orientations in all areas. Enterprises’ supply chain management applications are also affected by this situation, and the concept of green supply chain management which reflects the environmentalist perspective has emerged. One of the most important stages of this chain is to find suppliers who care about the environment. Choosing a green supplier is of great importance for both the business and the environment. In this study, 11 environmental criteria were defined for green supplier evaluation and SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method was used to determine the most suitable supplier. Furthermore, a case study for an international yachting company operating in Turkey was also presented in this study. Based on the results of the study, it was seen that supplier 2 was the most suitable among five prominent alternative suppliers, and “environmental management system”, “senior management’s support and commitment”, and “green image” criteria were ranked as the top three criteria among the 11 determined criteria.

Keywords

Ecological risk Green supplier MCDM SWARA TOPSIS 

Notes

References

  1. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid neutrosophic group ANP-TOPSIS framework for supplier selection problems. Symmetry, 10(6), 226–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdullah, L., Chan, W., & Afshari, A. (2019). Application of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(2), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acar, A. Z., Önden, I., & Gürel, Ö. (2016). Evaluation of the parameters of the green supplier selection decision in textile industry. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 25(5), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akman, G. (2015). Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awasthi, A., & Kannan, G. (2016). Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Büyüközkan, G., & Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). Yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi. Lojistik Dergisi, 8, 66–73.Google Scholar
  8. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, K., Pamucar, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiou, C. Y., Hsu, C. W., & Hwang, W. Y. (2008). Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1909–1914). New Jersey: IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. COMEAP. (2010). The mortality effects of long-term exposure to particulate air pollution in the United Kingdom, a report by the committee on the medical effects of air pollutants.Google Scholar
  13. Demir, L., Akpınar, M. E., Araz, C., & Ilgın, M. A. (2018). A green supplier evaluation system based on a new multi-criteria sorting method: VIKORSORT. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deshmukh, S., & Sunnapwar, V. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for green supplier selection in Indian industries. In In Proceedings of the international conference on Advanced Engineering Optimization through Intelligent Techniques. Surat: SVNIT.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, P. R. (2008). Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environment and Development Economics, 13(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, J., & Chen, T. (2015). Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(3), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galankashi, M. R., Chegeni, A., Soleimanynanadegany, A., Memari, A., Anjomshoae, A., Helmi, S. A., et al. (2015). Prioritizing green supplier selection criteria using fuzzy analytical network process. Procedia CIRP, 26, 689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gören, H. G. (2018). A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1156–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grisi, R. M., Guerra, L., & Naviglio, G. (2010). Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. In In Business performance measurement and management (pp. 149–163). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo, Z., Liu, H., Zhang, D., & Yang, J. (2017). Green supplier evaluation and selection in apparel manufacturing using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability, 9(4), 650–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurel, O., Acar, A. Z., Onden, I., & Gumus, I. (2015). Determinants of the green supplier selection. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holdway, R., Walker, D., & Hilton, M. (2002). Eco-design and successful packaging. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 13(4), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hota, H. S., Awasthi, V. K., & Singhai, S. K. (2018). Comparative analysis of AHP and its integrated techniques applied for stock index ranking. In In Progress in Intelligent Computing Techniques: Theory, Practice, and Applications (pp. 127–134). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu, C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2007). Application of analytic network process on supplier selection to hazardous substance management in green supply chain management. In In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1362–1368). New Jersey: IEEE.Google Scholar
  28. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. S. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IMEAK DenizTicareti, (2017). Rakamlarla denizcilik sektörü ve istatistikler. İstanbul: IMEAK.Google Scholar
  30. İBB Gemi ve Yat İhracatçıları Birliği (2018). Gemi ve Yat İhracat Değerlendirmesi. http://www.iib.org.tr/files/downloads/raporlar/2018/ocak/gemi_ocak2018.pdf. .
  31. Jauhar, S. K., & Pant, M. (2017). Integrating DEA with DE and MODE for sustainable supplier selection. Journal of computational science, 21, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiang, W., & Huang, C. (2018). A Multi-criteria Decision-making Model for Evaluating Suppliers in Green SCM. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 13(3), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar, A., & Jain, V. (2010). Supplier selection: a green approach with carbon footprint monitoring. In In 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information (pp. 1–8). New Jersey: IEEE.Google Scholar
  37. Lamprecht, J. L. (1997). ISO 14001: Issues and Implementation Guidelines for Responsible Management. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
  38. Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Aryee, M., et al. (2012). A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, T. P. N., Genovese, A., & Koh, L. S. (2011). Using FAHP to determine the criteria for partner's selection within a green supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(1), 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, A. H., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, A., Xiao, Y., Ji, X., Wang, K., Tsai, S. B., Lu, H., et al. (2018). A novel two-stage integrated model for supplier selection of green fresh product. Sustainability, 10(7), 2371–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu, L. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T. C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4317–4331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2016). Comparative evaluation of GSCM practices in automotive components manufacturing firms of India: a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 25(3), 358–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathiyazhagan, K., Sudhakar, S., & Bhalotia, A. (2018). Modeling the criteria for selection of suppliers towards green aspect: a case in Indian automobile industry. Opsearch, 55(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 216–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Halicka, K., Ejdys, J., Magruk, A., Ahmad, U., & U. N. (2018). Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: a review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1666–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mavi, R. K., Kazemi, S., Najafabadi, A. F., & Mousaabadi, H. B. (2013). Identification and assessment of logistical factors to evaluate a green supplier using the fuzzy logic DEMATEL method. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(2), 445–455.Google Scholar
  49. Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: a multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mumtaz, U., Ali, Y., & Petrillo, A. (2018). A linear regression approach to evaluate the green supply chain management impact on industrial organizational performance. Science of the Total Environment, 624, 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mumtaz, U., Ali, Y., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2018). Identifying the critical factors of green supply chain management: environmental benefits in Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 640-641, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Noci, G. (1997). Designing ‘green’vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(2), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pang, Q., Yang, T., Li, M., & Shen, Y. (2017). A fuzzy-grey multicriteria decision making approach for green supplier selection in low-carbon supply chain. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017.Google Scholar
  54. Parkinson, H. J., & Thompson, G. (2003). Analysis and taxonomy of remanufacturing industry practice. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 217(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perçin, S. (2019). An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(2), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phochanikorn, P., & Tan, C. (2019). An integrated multi-criteria decision-making model based on prospect theory for green supplier selection under uncertain environment: a case study of the Thailand palm oil products industry. Sustainability, 11(7), 1872–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 626–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. REC Türkiye. (2011). Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi. Yeşil alım! Yeşil satın alım el kitabı. https://rec.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ysa_elkitabi_low.pdf. .
  59. Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., & Sabaghi, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecological Indicators, 49, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Santos, B. M., Godoy, L. P., & Campos, L. M. (2019). Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharma, V. K., Chandna, P., & Bhardwaj, A. (2017). Green supply chain management related performance indicators in agro industry: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1194–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shojaie, A. A., Babaie, S., Sayah, E., & Mohammaditabar, D. (2018). Analysis and prioritization of green health suppliers using fuzzy ELECTRE method with a case study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, J., Andersson, G., Gourlay, R., Karner, S., Mikkelsen, B. E., Sonnino, R., & Barling, D. (2016). Balancing competing policy demands: the case of sustainable public sector food procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply chain management: a state of the art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(2), 181–187.Google Scholar
  68. Tavana, M., Yazdani, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2017). An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Hughes, L., et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427(6970), 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tsai, S. B., Wei, Y. M., Chen, K. Y., Xu, L., Du, P., & Lee, H. C. (2016). Evaluating green suppliers from a green environmental perspective. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(5), 941–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., & Bakhat, R. (2019). An application of fuzzy integrated model in green supplier selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4256359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Um, W. S. (2016). Supplier evaluation and selection using AHP method and uncertainty theory. In In Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering (pp. 22–23).Google Scholar
  73. Uygun, Ö., & Dede, A. (2016). Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vishnu, V. A., Babu, J., & George, B. (2018). Green supplier selection using hybrid grey relational analysis with fuzzy logic method. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 396, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing Bristol, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, Y. J. (2008). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1837–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang Chen, H. M., Chou, S. Y., Luu, Q. D., & Yu, T. H. K. (2016). A fuzzy MCDM approach for green supplier selection from the economic and environmental aspects. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8097386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang, K. Q., Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Huang, J. (2017). Green supplier evaluation and selection using cloud model theory and the QUALIFLEX method. Sustainability, 9(5), 688–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yazdani, M. (2014). An integrated MCDM approach to green supplier selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(3), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yazdani, M., Zolfani, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yu, Q., & Hou, F. (2016). An approach for green supplier selection in the automobile manufacturing industry. Kybernetes, 45(4), 571–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yucesan, M., Mete, S., Serin, F., Celik, E., & Gul, M. (2019). An integrated best-worst and interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection. Mathematics, 7(2), 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A., & Bon, A. T. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: an empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Volvačiovas, R., & Kildienė, S. (2013). Multi-criteria assessment model of technologies. Studies in Informatics and Control, 22(4), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2014). Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability. Sustainability, 6(1), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhou, X., & Xu, Z. (2018). An integrated sustainable supplier selection approach based on hybrid information aggregation. Sustainability, 10(7), 2543–2592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering, Engineering Faculty Suleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering, Engineering FacultyTurk-Alman UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations