Advertisement

Determination of pendimethalin in water, sediment, and Procambarus clarkii by high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

  • Qiuhong YangEmail author
  • Xiaohui AiEmail author
  • Siqi Li
  • Huan Liu
  • Yongtao Liu
Article

Abstract

We established a high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method for the analysis of pendimethalin residues in water, sediments, and Procambarus clarkii (Louisiana crayfish) tissues. Water samples were concentrated on a HLB solid-phase extraction column and eluted with dichloromethane and acetone (1:1). After drying under a stream of nitrogen gas, the sample volume was adjusted to 1 mL with the mobile phase solvent methanol/water/acetic acid (8:20:0.1). Pendimethalin was extracted with ethyl acetate containing 0.1% acetic acid, after rotary evaporation to dryness at 35 °C, the residue was dissolved in mobile phase solvent, purified by a neutral alumina column and graphitized carbon black powder (0.1 g). The mass characterization was conducted in positive ion mode, and the corresponding ions were detected in multi-reaction monitoring mode. The linear equations were y = 1 × 106x + 14275, at pendimethalin levels of 0.05–20 μg L−1 and y = 691029 × − 414368 for 20–200 μg L−1. The detection limits of pendimethalin in water, sediments, and P. clarkii tissues were 1.0 × 10−4μg L−1 , 5.0 × 10−3μg kg −1 and 5.0 × 10−3 μg kg −1, respectively. The spiked recoveries ranged from 81.6 to 106.3%, and the relative standard deviations ranged from 4.58 to 13.6% (n = 6). The method provided an efficient and low-cost extraction and purification procedure that enabled a sensitive determination of pendimethalin in water as well as complex matrices.

Keywords

High performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry Pendimethalin Water Sediment Rice-Procambarus clarkii–integrated planting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the individuals who helped during the research and especially Professor Geng Leng (School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China) for his suggestions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human subjects. All animal experiments in this study adhered to Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences guidelines and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Funding information

This study was funded by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (Project Number 2018HY-ZD0606), and the Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (Project Number 201503108-CC-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

All animal experiments in this study adhered to Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences guidelines and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Ajoy, S., Ahammed, S. T. P., Kaushik, B., Sandip, H., Debarati, B., Jain, N. K., & Sagar, U. (2015). Simultaneous analysis of herbicides pendimethalin, oxyfluorfen, imazethapyr and quizalofop-p-ethyl by LC–MS/MS and safety evaluation of their harvest time residues in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(7), 4001–4014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andressa, G., Djenaine, D. S., Sergio, A. S., & Machado. (2011). Pendimethalin determination in natural water, baby food and river sediment samples using electroanalytical methods. Microchemical Journal, 98(1), 9–143.Google Scholar
  3. Chopra, I., Chauhan, R., & Kumari, B. (2015). Persistence of pendimethalin in/on wheat, straw, soil and water. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 95(5), 694–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danion, M., Le, F. S., Pannetier, P., Van, A. K., & Morin, T. (2018). TRANSCHEM project-Part I: impact of long-term exposure to pendimethalin on the health status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss L.) genitors. Aquatic Toxicology, 202, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dolores, B. M., María, M. G., Piedad, P. V., & Dolores, M., G.,. G. (2007). Simple and rapid determination of benzoylphenylurea pesticides in river water and vegetables by LC–ESI-MS. Chromatographia, 66(7-8), 533–538.Google Scholar
  6. European Food Safety Authority. (2016). Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pendimethalin. EFSA Journal, 14(3), 4420–4432.Google Scholar
  7. Extention Toxicology Network (EXTOXNET). (n.d.). Pesticide information profile, Available online at http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/ghindex.html.
  8. Fisheries Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). 2018 Industry development report of Procambarus clarkii in China. http://www.sohu.com/a/236968379_692031.
  9. Lim, H. H., Park, T. J., Lee, S. H., & Shin, H. S. (2017). Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Science and Technology, 30(4), 194–204.Google Scholar
  10. Isensee, A. R., & Dubey, P. S. (1983). Distribution of pendimethalin in an aquatic microecosystem. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1983, 30(1), 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Islam, A. K. M. M., Hong, S. M., Lee, H. S., Moon, B. C., Kim, D., & Kwon, H. (2018). Identification and characterization of matrix components in spinach during QuEChERS sample preparation for pesticide residue analysis by LC-ESI-MS/MS, GC-MS and UPLC-DAD. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(10), 3930–3938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jigneshkumar, V. R., & Suresh, K. K. (2017). Simple and selective detection of pendimethalin herbicide in water and food samples based on the aggregation of ractopamine-dithiocarbamate functionalized gold nanoparticles. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 245, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Makkar, A., Kaur, P., Kaur, P., & Kaur, K. (2016). Comparison of extraction techniques for quantitative analysis of pendimethalin from soil and rice grain. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 39(15), 718–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohammad, F., Roya, N., Hooshang, S., & Mohammadkazem, R. (2018). Determination of acetamiprid, imidacloprid, and spirotetramat and their relevant metabolites in pistachio using modified QuEChERS combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 240, 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morgane, D., Ste´phane, L. F., Jeanne, C., Francois, L., Joëlle, C., & Claire, Q. (2012). Effect of chronic exposure to pendimethalin on the susceptibility of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss L., to viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 79, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morten, S., & Janeck, J. S. F. (2004). Effects of pendimethalin at lower trophic levels-a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 57(2), 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Navneet, K., & Makhan, S. B. (2015). Harvest time residues of pendimethalin and oxyfluorfen in vegetables and soil in sugarcane-based intercropping systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(5), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shah, J., Rasul, J. M., Shehzad, F., & Ara, B. (2011). Quantification of pendimethalin in soil and garlic samples by microwave-assisted solvent extraction and HPLCmethod. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175(1-4), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sherif, B., Abdel, G., & Ahmad, H. (2016). QuEChERS method combined with GC–MS for pesticide residues determination in water. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 71(5), 508–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tabassum, H., Afjal, M. A., Khan, J., Raisuddin, S., & Parvez, S. (2015). Neurotoxicological assessment of pendimethalin in freshwater fish Channa punctata Bloch. Ecological Indicators, 58, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UBA (Umweltbundesamt) ETOX. (n.d.). Information system ecotoxicology and environmental quality targets database, (Germany Umweltbundesamt, Sachsen anhalt). Available online at http://webetox.uba.de/webETOX/public/search/ziel/open.do?language=en&language=de
  22. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), National primary drinking water regulations, EPA 822-R-03-005 (Office of Water, Washington DC, 1998). Available online at http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/#List.
  23. Xu, H., Song, D. D., Cui, Y. F., Hu, S., Yu, Q. W., & Feng, Y. Q. (2009). Analysis of hexanal and heptanal in human blood by simultaneous derivatization and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction then LC-APCI-MS-MS. Chromatographia, 70(5-6), 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zehra, S. K., Sevtap, A., Ülkü, Ü. B., & Nurşen, B. (2018). In vitro genotoxicity assessment of dinitroaniline herbicides pendimethalin and trifluralin. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 113, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang, Z. H., Dong, M. F., Hao, X. H., Han, L. J., Song, S. Y., & Yao, W. (2019). Evaluation of cleanup procedures in pesticide multi-residue analysis with QuEChERS in cinnamon bark. Food Chemistry, 276, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou, T. Y. (2014). Study on residues regularity and ecological toxicity of pendimethalin in rice and paddy soil and water environment. Hunan agricultural university.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yangtze River Fisheries Research InstituteChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Key Laboratory of Control of Quality and Safety for Aquatic ProductsMinistry of AgricultureBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of FisheriesHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations