Advertisement

A sustainable approach to manage metal-contaminated soils: a preliminary greenhouse study for the possible production of metal-enriched ryegrass biomass for biosourced catalysts

  • Marie Hechelski
  • Brice Louvel
  • Pierrick Dufrénoy
  • Alina Ghinet
  • Christophe WaterlotEmail author
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Two kitchen garden soils (A and B) sampled in contaminated areas were amended using phosphates in sustainable quantities in order to reduce the environmental availability of potentially toxic inorganic elements (PTEs) and to favour the availability of alkali, alkali earth and micronutrients. The environmental availability of PTEs was evaluated using a potential plant for revegetation of contaminated soils (ryegrass) and a mixture of low molecular weight organic acids. Despite the highest contamination level of B, the concentration of metals was highest in the ryegrass shoots grown on A for the two harvests. These results correlated well with those obtained using low molecular weight organic acids for Cd, Zn and Cu, whereas this mixture failed to represent the transfer of nutrients due to the presence of biological and physiological mechanisms. The statistical differences between the biomass of ryegrass obtained at the first and the second harvests were attributed to the decrease of available potassium, implicated in the growth and development of plants. Phosphates increased the ratios Zn/Cd, Zn/Pb and Zn/Cu up to 176 ± 48, 38 ± 6 and 80 ± 12, respectively, and made possible the reduction of the concentration of Cd and Pb in the shoots of ryegrass by 22% and 25%, respectively. The concentration of Zn in the shoots of ryegrass from the first and the second harvests grown on soil A were in the range 1050–2000 mg kg−1, making this plant a potential biomass to (i) produce biosourced catalysts for organic chemistry applications in a circular economy concept and (ii) limit human exposure to commercial Lewis acids. A preliminary application was identified.

Keywords

Amendments Metal Nutrient Phosphorus Renewable resource Ryegrass; Soil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors warmly thank the “Fondation de la Catho de Lille, France” and Yncréa Hauts-de-France for the financial support of this work.

References

  1. Al Souki, K. S., Louvel, B., Douay, F., Pourrut, B. (2017). Assessment of Miscanthus Χ giganteus capacity to restore the functionality of metal-contaminated soils: Ex situ experiment. Applied Soil Ecology, 115, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, F., Sadiq, A., Amin, M., & Amir, M. (2014). Effect of applied phosphorus on the availability of micronutrients in alkaline-calcareous soil. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 4, 143–147.Google Scholar
  3. Austruy, A., Shahid, M., Xiong, T., Castrec, M., Payre, V., Niazi, N. K., Sabir, M., & Dumat, C. (2014). Mechanism of meatal-phosphates formation in the rhizosphere soils of pea and tomato: environmental and sanitary consequences. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 666–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasilli, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation technique-classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolan, N. S., Domy, C. A., & Ravi, N. (2003). Role of phosphorus in (im)mobilization and bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil plant system: A review. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 177, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, S., Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Yang, S., Wang, F., Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2016). Enhancement of lead phytoremediation by perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) using agent of Streptomyces pactum Act12. Journal of Petroleum & Environmental Biotechnology, 7, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, S. Y., Ou, S. F., Teng, N. C., Kung, C. M., Tsai, H. L., Chu, K. T., & Ou, K. L. (2013). Phase transformation on bone cement: Monocalcium phosphate monohydrate into calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite during setting. Ceramics International, 39, 2451–2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Douay, F., Roussel, H., Pruvot, C., Loriette, A., & Fourrier, H. (2008). Assessment of a remediation technique using the replacement of contaminated soils in kitchen gardens nearby a former smelter in Northern France. Science of the Total Environment, 401, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufrénoy, P., Ghinet, A., Hechelski, M., Daïch, A., & Waterlot, C. (2019). An innovative and efficient method to synthesize meloxicam in one-step procedure with respect to the green chemistry. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 16, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng, M. H., Shan, X. Q., Zhang, S. Z., & Wen, B. (2005). Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat. Chemosphere, 50, 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hechelski, M., Ghinet, A., Louvel, B., Dufrénoy, P., Rigo, B., Daïch, A., & Waterlot, C. (2018). From Conventional Lewis acids to heterogeneous montmorillonite K10, eco-friendly plant-based catalysts used as green Lewis acids. Chemistry & Sustainability Energy & Materials, 11, 1249–1277.Google Scholar
  12. Ifon, B.E., Finagnon Togbé, A.C., Sewedo Tometin, L.A., Suanon F., Yessoufou, A. (2019). Metal-contaminated soil remediation: phytoremediation, chemical leaching and electrochemical remediation, metals in soil - contamination and remediation, Zinnat Ara Begum, Ismail M. M. Rahman and Hiroshi Hasegawa, IntechOpenGoogle Scholar
  13. Jakovljević, M. D., Kostić, N. M., & Antić-Mladenović, S. B. (2003). The availability of base elements (Ca, Mg, Na, K) in some important soil types in Serbia, Proceedings for Natural Sciences. Matica Srpska Novi Sad, 104, 11–21.Google Scholar
  14. Janus, A., Pelfrêne, A., Heymans, S., Deboffe, C., Douay, F., & Waterlot, C. (2015). Elaboration, characteristics and advantages of biochars for the management of contaminated soils with a specific overview on Miscanthus biochars. Journal of Environmental Management, 162, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janus, A., Pelfrêne, A., Samer, K., Heymans, S., Deboffe, C., Douay, F., Waterlot, C. (2017). Value of biochars from Miscanthus × giganteus cultivated on contaminated soils to decrease the availability of metals in multicontaminated aqueous solutions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 18204–18217, Value of biochars from Miscanthus x giganteus cultivated on contaminated soils to decrease the availability of metals in multicontaminated aqueous solutionsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jungk, A., & Claassen, N. (1986). Availability of phosphate and potassium as the result of interactions between root and soil in the rhizosphere. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 149, 411–427.Google Scholar
  17. Khalid, S., Shahid, M., Niazi, N. K., Murtuza, B., Bibi, I., & Dumat, C. (2016). A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 182, 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Mare, P. (1977). Experiments on effects of phosphorus on the manganese nutrition of plants III The effect of calcium: phosphorus ratio on manganese in cotton grown in Buganda soil. Plant and Soil, 47, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma, Y., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Zhou, S., Wu, Y., Wang, J., Huang, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). Remediating potentially toxic metal and organic co-contamination of soil by combining in situ solidification/stabilization and chemical oxidation: efficacy, mechanism, and evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2595–2614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahar, A., Ping, W., Ronghua, L., & Zengqiang, Z. (2015). Immobilization of lead and cadmium in contaminated soil using amendments: A review. Pedosphere, 25, 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchand, C., Mench, M., Jani, Y., Kaczala, F., Notini, P., Hijri, M., & Hogland, W. (2018). Pilot scale aided-phytoremediation of co-contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment, 618, 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McBride, M. B. (2003). Toxic metals in sewage sludge–amended soils: has promotion of beneficial use discounted the risks? Advances in Environmental Research, 8, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mench, M., Morel, J. L., Guckert, A., & Guillet, B. (1988). Metal binding with root exudates of low molecular weight. Journal of Soil Science, 39, 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nsanganwimana, F., Waterlot, C., Louvel, B., Pourrut, B., & Douay, F. (2016). Metal, nutrient and biomass accumulation during the growing cycle of Miscanthus established on metal-contaminated soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 179, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ojuederie, O. B., & Babalola, O. O. (2017). Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1504–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pelfrêne, A., Détriché, S., & Douay, F. (2015). Combining spatial distribution with oral bioaccessibility of metals in smelter-impacted soils: implications for human health risk assessment. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 37, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pruvot, C., Douay, F., Fourrier, H., & Waterlot, C. (2006). Heavy metals in soil, crops and grass as a source of human exposure in the former mining areas. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 6, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rafael, R. B. A., Fernández-Marcos, M. L., Cocco, S., Ruello, M. L., Weindorf, D. C., Cardelli, V., & Corti, G. (2018). Assessment of potential nutrient release from phosphate rock and dolostone for application in acid soils. Pedosphere, 28, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rees, F., Sterckeman, T., & Morel, J. L. (2016). Root development of non-accumulation and hyperaccumulating plants in metal-contaminated soils amended with biochar. Chemosphere, 142, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rengel, Z. (2015). Availability of Mn, Zn and Fe in the rhizosphere. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15, 397–409.Google Scholar
  31. Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environment Development, 17, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schenkeveld, W. D. C., Kimber, R. L., Walter, M., Oburger, E., Puschenreiter, M., & Kraemer, S. M. (2017). Experimental considerations in metal mobilization from soil by chelating ligands: the influence of soil-solution ratio and pre-equilibration – a case study on Fe acquisition by phytosiderophores. Science of the Total Environment, 579, 1831–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Selvi, A., Rajasekar, A., Theerthagiri, J., Ananthaselvam, A., Sathishkumar, K., Madhavan, J., & Rahman, P. K. S. M. (2019). Integrated remediation processes toward heavy metal removal/recovery from various environments – A review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sterckeman, T., Douay, F., Proix, N., Fourrier, H., & Perdrix, E. (2002). Assessment of the contamination of cultivated soils by eighteen trace elements around smelters in the North of France. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 135, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tripathy, D. K., Singh, V. P., Chauhan, D. K., Prasad, S. M., & Dubey, N. K. (2014). Role of macronutrients in plant growth and acclimation: recent advances and future prospective. In P. Ahmad, M. R. Wani, & L.-S. P. T. AzoozMM (Eds.), Improvement of crops in the era of climatic changes (pp. 197–216). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Vose, P. B. (1963). The cation content of perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne L. in relation to intraspecific variability and nitrogen/potassium interaction. Plant and Soil, 19, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waterlot, C., Pruvot, C., Ciesielski, H., & Douay, F. (2011). Effects of a P amendment and the pH of water used for watering on the mobility and phytoavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn in highly contaminated kitchen garden soils. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1081–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waterlot, C., Pruvot, C., Marot, F., & Douay, F. (2017). Impact of a phosphate amendment on the environmental availability and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in moderately and highly carbonated kitchen garden soils. Pedosphere, 27, 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu, Y., Liang, X., Xu, Y., Qin, X., Huang, Q., Wang, L., & Sun, Y. (2017). Remediation of heavy metal-polluted agricultural soils using clay minerals: A review. Pedosphere, 27, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu, L., Xing, X., Liang, J., Peng, J., & Zhou, J. (2019). In situ phytoremediation of copper and cadmium in co-contaminated soil and its biological and physical effects. RSC Advances, 9, 993–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Zhang, C., Dai, J., Liang, J., Yu, J., Ren, X., Yi, H., Chang, M., & Zhang, C. (2017a). Biological technologies for the remediation of co-contaminated soil. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 37, 1062–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Zhang, C., Liang, J., Dai, J., Liu, Z., Xiong, W., Wan, J., Xu, P., & Cheng, M. (2017b). Co-occurrence and interactions of pollutants, and their impacts on soil remediation – A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 1528–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Liang, J., Zhang, C., Dai, J., Xiong, W., Song, B., Wu, S., & Yu, J. (2019). The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 278–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeng, G., Wan, J., Huang, D., Hu, L., Huang, C., Cheng, M., Xu, W., Gong, X., Wang, R., & Jiang, D. (2017). Precipitation, adsorption and rhizosphere effect: The mechanisms for phosphate-induced Pb immobilization in soils – A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 339, 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang, M., Wang, J., Bai, S. H., Zhang, Y., Teng, Y., & Xu, Z. (2019). Assisted phytoremediation of a co-contaminated soil with biochar amendment: Contaminant removals and bacterial community properties. Geoderma, 348, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Génie Civil et géoEnvironnement (LGCgE), Yncrea Hauts-de-FranceInstitut Supérieur d’AgricultureLille CedexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de chimie durable et santé, Yncrea Hauts-de-FranceEcole des Hautes Etudes d’IngénieurLille CedexFrance
  3. 3.Normandie Univ., UNILEHAVRE, FR 3038 CNRS, URCOMLe Havre CedexFrance
  4. 4.Faculté de médecine – Pôle recherche Inserm U995, LIRICUniversité de Lille, CHU de Lille Place VerdunLille CedexFrance
  5. 5.Faculty of Chemistry‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ University of IasiIasiRomania
  6. 6.Equipe Biotechnologie et Gestion des Agents Pathogènes en agriculture (BIOGAP), Yncréa Hauts-de-FranceInstitut Supérieur d’AgricultureLille CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations