Estimating a baseline of soil CO2 flux at CO2 geological storage sites
- 27 Downloads
This study aims to determine a baseline for natural soil carbon dioxide (CO2) flux at the surface based on long-term field measurements, with the ultimate purpose to detect the gas leakage at CO2 geological storage sites. CO2 surface monitoring is a tool that measures the safety and effectiveness of CO2 capture and storage (CCS), a technology which is believed to be a reliable approach to mitigate the CO2 emission. However, the fluctuations of naturally occurring CO2 in soil layers complicate the leakage detection as the soil connects both the underground layers and the atmosphere. In this regard, this study not only investigates the natural surface CO2 flux behavior but also develops an equation to estimate the surface CO2 flux with respect to the soil moisture content and temperature. To meet this end, two values within the CO2 flux equation were defined and calculated based on the field measurements; a, representing a water saturation–dependent value, and b, representing the temperature sensitivity (independent of the water saturation). The results show a good agreement between estimated and measured data. Upon which, the maximum baseline for surface CO2 flux was derived and used as a threshold to detect the potential CO2 leakage in the candidate field (INAS, Japan).
KeywordsSoil CO2 flux Soil temperature Water saturation Threshold line
This study was financially supported by the Sumitomo Foundation (Tokyo, Japan) and the Arai Science and Technology Foundation (Tokyo, Japan).
- Bahn, M., Reichstein, M., Davidson, E. A., Grünzweig, J., Jung, M., Carbone, M. S., Epron, D., Misson, L., Nouvellon, Y., Roupsard, O., Savage, K., Trumbore, S. E., Gimeno, C., Curiel Yuste, J., Tang, J., Vargas, R., & Janssens, I. A. (2010). Soil respiration at mean annual temperature predicts annual total across vegetation types and biomes. Biogeosciences, 7, 2147–2157. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2147-2010.Soil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beaubien, S. E., Jones, D. G., Gal, F., Barkwith, A. K. A. P., Braibant, G., Baubron, J. C., Ciotoli, G., Graziani, S., Lister, T. R., Lombardi, S., Michel, K., Quattrocchi, F., & Strutt, M. H. (2013). Monitoring of near-surface gas geochemistry at the Weyburn, Canada, CO2-EOR site, 2001-2011. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, S236–S262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, G. S. (1985). Soil physics with basic. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Dar JA, Ganie KA, Sundarapandian S (2015) Soil CO2 efflux among four coniferous forest types of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4927-2.
- Davison J, Freund P, Smith A (2001) Putting carbon back into the ground. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4927-2.
- Global CCS Institute (2017) The global status of CCS: 2017. 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4927-2.
- Hashimoto, S., & Komatsu, H. (2006). Relationships between soil CO2 concentration and CO2 production, temperature, water content, and gas diffusivity: implications for field studies through sensitivity analyses. Journal of Forest Research, 11, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-005-0185-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jassal, R. S., Black, T. A., Drewitt, G. B., Novak, M. D., Gaumont-Guay, D., & Nesic, Z. (2004). A model of the production and transport of CO2 in soil: predicting soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 efflux from a forest floor. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jiang, H., Deng, Q., Zhou, G., Hui, D., Zhang, D., Liu, S., Chu, G., & Li, J. (2013). Responses of soil respiration and its temperature/moisture sensitivity to precipitation in three subtropical forests in southern China. Biogeosciences, 10, 3963–3982. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3963-2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kishimoto-Mo, A. W., Yonemura, S., Uchida, M., Kondo, M., Murayama, S., & Koizumi, H. (2015). Contribution of soil moisture to seasonal and annual variations of soil CO2 efflux in a humid cool-temperate oak-birch forest in central Japan. Ecological Research, 30, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-015-1254-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Linn, D. M., & Doran, J. W. (1984). Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48, 1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060013x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loisy, C., Cohen, G., Laveuf, C., le Roux, O., Delaplace, P., Magnier, C., Rouchon, V., Cerepi, A., & Garcia, B. (2013). The CO2-vadose project: dynamics of the natural CO2 in a carbonate vadose zone. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 14, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marshall, T. J. (1959). The diffusion of gases through porous media. Journal of Soil Science, 10, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1959.tb00667.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pumpanen, J., Kulmala, L., Lindén, A., et al. (2015). Seasonal dynamics of autotrophic respiration in boreal forest soil estimated by continuous chamber measurements. Boreal Environment Research, 20, 637–650.Google Scholar
- Reichstein, M., Subke, J.-A., Angeli, A. C., & Tenhunen, J. D. (2005). Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time? Global Change Biology, 11, 1754–1767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01010.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rey, A., Petsikos, C., Jarvis, P. G., & Grace, J. (2005). Effect of temperature and moisture on rates of carbon mineralization in a Mediterranean oak forest soil under controlled and field conditions. European Journal of Soil Science, 56, 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00699.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schroder, I. F., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., & Feitz, A. J. (2016). The role of soil flux and soil gas monitoring in the characterisation of a CO2 surface leak: a case study in Qinghai, China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 54, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tarboton, D. G. (1982). Rainfall-runoff processes. Linseley, 159, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Meteorological Organization. (2016). WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, 12, 1–8 ISSN 2078-0796.Google Scholar