Response of ecosystem water use efficiency to climate change in the Tianshan Mountains, Central Asia
- 53 Downloads
Ecosystem water use efficiency (EWUE) is a popular issue in the comprehensive study of climate change, ecology, and hydrology. Currently, views on the response of EWUE to temperature, precipitation, and drought remain controversial. Based on ecosystem net primary productivity (NPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) datasets, both of which were retrieved from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) using the Carnegie Ames Stanford approach (CASA) and surface energy balance algorithms for land (SEBAL) models, respectively, this study comprehensively examined the relationship between EWUE and temperature, precipitation, and drought in the Tianshan Mountains of Central Asia. The results showed that EWUE had an obvious temporal change trend in the Tianshan Mountains. The EWUEs of all vegetation types presented an increasing trend in spring and a decreasing trend in autumn. These results led to a phase shift in the annual cycle of EWUE over the years. Compared with 2000 to 2003, from 2012 to 2016, the annual EWUE cycle had advanced by 32 days. Precipitation generally had a negative effect on EWUE, while temperature had an obvious positive effect on EWUE. The EWUE responses to drought for the different vegetation types showed a variety of change trends. With the increase in drought stress, EWUE not only showed a simple upward or downward trend but also showed an upward trend followed by a downward trend or a downward trend followed by an upward trend. EWUE is more sensitive to changing environments than NPP or ET and is more suitable for analyzing ecosystem responses to global change.
KeywordsClimate change Drought Elasticity coefficient Net primary productivity (NPP)
We thank the editor and anonymous reviewers, whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571109) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA20100303).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cetin, M., Adiguzel, F., Kaya, O., & Sahap, A. (2016). Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environment Development & Sustainability, 20, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Gang, C., Wang, Z., Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Li, J., Chen, J., Qi, J., Odeh, I., & Groisman, P. Y. (2016b). Assessing the spatiotemporal dynamic of global grassland water use efficiency in response to climate change from 2000 to 2013. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 202(5), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Seneviratne, S. I., Sheffield, J., Goulden, M. L., Bonan, G., Cescatti, A., Chen, J., de Jeu, R., Dolman, A. J., Eugster, W., Gerten, D., Gianelle, D., Gobron, N., Heinke, J., Kimball, J., Law, B. E., Montagnani, L., Mu, Q., Mueller, B., Oleson, K., Papale, D., Richardson, A. D., Roupsard, O., Running, S., Tomelleri, E., Viovy, N., Weber, U., Williams, C., Wood, E., Zaehle, S., & Zhang, K. (2010). Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467(7318), 951–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kauwe, M. G. D., Medlyn, B. E., Zaehle, S., Walker, A. P., Dietze, M. C., Hickler, T., et al. (2013). Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model-data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites. Global Change Biology, 19(6), 1759–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knauer, J., Zaehle, S., Reichstein, M., Medlyn, B. E., Forkel, M., Hagemann, S., & Werner, C. (2017). The response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations: sensitivity and large-scale biogeochemical implications. New Phytologist, 213(4), 1654–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, S. G., Eugster, W., Asanuma, J., Kotani, A., Davaa, G., Oyunbaatar, D., et al. (2015). Response of gross ecosystem productivity, light use efficiency, and water use efficiency of Mongolian steppe to seasonal variations in soil moisture. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 113(G1), 777–793.Google Scholar
- Li, Q., Lai, L., Zhou, J., Hui, D., Guan, T., Zhang, X., et al. (2018). Differential influence of elevated CO 2 on gas exchange and water use efficiency of four indigenous shrub species distributed in different sandy environments in central Inner Mongolia. Ecological Research, 33, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, C., He, N., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Yu, G. (2017). Variation of stomatal traits from cold-temperate to tropical forests and association with water use efficiency. Functional Ecology, 32(1).Google Scholar
- Malone, S. L., Tulbure, M. G., Pérez-Luque, A. J., Assal, T. J., Bremer, L. L., Drucker, D. P., Hillis, V., Varela, S., & Goulden, M. L. (2016). Drought resistance across California ecosystems: evaluating changes in carbon dynamics using satellite imagery. Ecosphere, 7(11).Google Scholar
- Mitchell, H. (2016). Impact of global change on karst groundwater mineralization in the Jura Mountains. Science of the Total Environment, 541(3), 1208–1221.Google Scholar
- Sáenz-Romero, C., Rehfeldt, G. E., Crookston, N. L., Duval, P., St-Amant, R., Beaulieu, J., & Richardson, B. A. (2010). Spline models of contemporary, 2030, 2060 and 2090 climates for Mexico and their use in understanding climate-change impacts on the vegetation. Climatic Change, 102(3–4), 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- StÉphane, P., LawrenceB, F., KarrinP, A., BruceG, J., Kai, M., Natascha, K., et al. (2010). Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among Douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques. Global Change Biology, 12(2), 294–310.Google Scholar
- Wang, W., Ding, Y., Junzeng, X. U., Jiao, X., & Yang, S. (2016). Simulation of future climate change effects on rice water requirement and water use efficiency through multi-model ensemble. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 47(6), 715–723.Google Scholar
- Xie, J., Zha, T., Zhou, C., Jia, X., Yu, H., Yang, B., Chen, J., Zhang, F., Wang, B., Bourque, C. P. A., Sun, G., Ma, H., Liu, H., & Peltola, H. (2016). Seasonal variation in ecosystem water use efficiency in an urban-forest reserve affected by periodic drought. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 221, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yan, H., Wang, S. Q., Billesbach, D., Oechel, W., Bohrer, G., Meyers, T., Martin, T. A., Matamala, R., Phillips, R. P., Rahman, F., Yu, Q., & Shugart, H. H. (2015). Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a new definition of water stress factor and a separate treatment of C3 and C4 plants. Ecological Modelling, 297(297), 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yigit, N., Sevik, H., Cetin, M., & Kaya, N. (2016). Determination of the effect of drought stress on the seed germination in some plant species. In I. M. M. Rahman, Z. A. Begum, & H. Hasegawa (Eds.), Water stress in plants (pp. 43–62). London: Intech Open.Google Scholar
- Yuan, W., Cai, W., Liu, S., Dong, W., Chen, J., Arain, M. A., Blanken, P. D., Cescatti, A., Wohlfahrt, G., Georgiadis, T., Genesio, L., Gianelle, D., Grelle, A., Kiely, G., Knohl, A., Liu, D., Marek, M. V., Merbold, L., Montagnani, L., Panferov, O., Peltoniemi, M., Rambal, S., Raschi, A., Varlagin, A., & Xia, J. (2014). Vegetation-specific model parameters are not required for estimating gross primary production. Ecological Modelling, 292(6), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu, X. J., Yu, G. R., Wang, Q. F., Hu, Z. M., Zheng, H., Li, S. G., Sun, X. M., Zhang, Y. P., Yan, J. H., Wang, H. M., Zhao, F. H., Zhang, J. H., Shi, P. L., Li, Y. N., Zhao, L., Zhang, F. W., & Hao, Y. B. (2015). Spatial variability of water use efficiency in China's terrestrial ecosystems. Global & Planetary Change, 129(X), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar