Assessment of pesticides in soil from obsolete pesticides stores: a Caribbean case study

  • G. D. EudoxieEmail author
  • G. Mathurin
  • V. Lopez
  • O. Perminova
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Global Approaches to Assessing, Monitoring, Mapping and Remedying Soil Pollution


The fate of highly hazardous or persistent pesticides in soils and their potential for environmental and health risks depends on the physical and chemical properties of the pesticide, soil properties including biological health and climatic conditions. Assessing the fate and impact of pesticides in soil is complicated in the Caribbean due to the high diversity of soils and duality of climate. The FAO supported national competent authorities from 11 countries in the Caribbean in the assessment of obsolete stocks and potentially contaminated soil. The Environmental Management Tool Kit (EMKT) prioritised Fond Cole and Camden Base as the only critical sites. Preliminary site investigations that utilised the rapid environmental assessment (REA) methodology identified that contamination was restricted to an impervious layer at the Camden site. Pesticide properties varied across groups, with the organochlorides exhibiting greater sorptive capacity and lower leaching potential relative to the organophosphates. All tested soils were non-saline with alkaline pH and notably sandy in texture with low adsorptive capacity. Analysis of pesticide levels revealed low to undetected quantities across contaminated sites. Traces of Endrin and Dieldrin were found in Marienburg, Suriname. Overall, assessment of soil contamination from stored obsolete pesticides revealed minimal contamination, however, detailed assessment considering contamination gradients should be performed where pesticides were identified.


Rapid environmental assessment Risk assessment Obsolete pesticides Caribbean Soil pollution 


Funding information

The authors would like to acknowledge the FAO, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the UWI for providing financial and technical support towards the implementation of this project.

The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.


  1. Ahmed, N. (2011). Soils of the Caribbean. Kinston: Ian Randle Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bocquene, G., & Franco, A. (2005). Pesticide contamination of the coastline of Martinique. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51(1–7), 612–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correll, R. L. (2001). The use of composite sampling in contaminated sites - a case study. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 8(3), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curtis, C., & Olsen, C. P. (2004). The Africa Stockpiles Programme: cleaning up obsolete pesticides; contributing to a healthier future. Industry and Environment, 27(2), 37–38.Google Scholar
  5. Elfvendahl, S., Mihale, M., Kishimba, M. A., & Kylin, H. (2004). Pesticide pollution remains severe after clean-up of a stockpile of obsolete pesticides at Vikuge, Tanzania. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 33(8), 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO. (2000). Assessing soil contamination: a reference manual. Rome, Italy: FAO pesticide disposal series 8, FAO.Google Scholar
  7. FAO. (2004). Childhood pesticide poisoning, information for advocacy and action. Châtelaine: UNEP Chemicals.Google Scholar
  8. FAO. (2008). Environmental management tool kit for obsolete pesticides (Vol. I). Rome: FAO Pesticide Disposal Tool Kit, FAO.Google Scholar
  9. FAO. (2016). Rapid environmental assessment (REA) investigator handbook. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  10. Haj-Younes, J., Huici, O., & Jørs, E. (2015). Sale, storage and use of legal, illegal and obsolete pesticides in Bolivia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 1(1), 1008860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harmsen, J., Ammati, M., & Davis, M. (2010). Guidelines for risk reduction of pesticides-contaminated soils. FAO pesticide disposal series. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  12. Kerle, E.A., Jenkins, J.J., & Vogue, P.A. 2007. Understanding pesticide persistence and mobility for groundwater and surface water protection. Oregon State University Extension Service, EM8561-E.Google Scholar
  13. Kodešová, R., Kočárek, M., Kodeš, V., Drábek, O., Kozák, J., & Hejtmánková, K. (2011). Pesticide adsorption in relation to soil properties and soil type distribution in regional scale. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186(1), 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulluru, P. P., Das, B. S., & Panda, R. K. (2010). Evaluation of sorption and leaching potential of malathion and atrazine in agricultural soils of India. International Journal of Environmental Research, 4(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
  15. McGrath, G., Hinz, C., & Sivapalan, M. (2010). Assessing the impact of regional rainfall variability on rapid pesticide leaching potential. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 113(1–4), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mrema, E. J., Rubino, F. M., & Colosio, C. (2013). Obsolete pesticides–a threat to environment, biodiversity and human health. In L. Simeonov, F. Macaev, & B. Simeonova (Eds.), Environmental security assessment and management of obsolete pesticides in Southeast Europe, NATO science for peace and security series C: environmental security (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Namiki, S., Otani, T., & Seike, N. (2013). Fate and plant uptake of persistent organic pollutants in soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 59(4), 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schneider, M., Endo, S., & Goss, K. (2013). Volatilization of pesticides from the bare soil surface: evaluation of the humidity effect. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42, 844–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shah, B. P., & Devkota, B. (2009). Obsolete pesticides: their environmental and human health hazards. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 10, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Syed, J. H., Malik, R. N., & Muhammad, A. (2014). Organochlorine pesticides in surface soils and sediments from obsolete pesticides dumping site near Lahore city, Pakistan: contamination status and their distribution. Chemistry and Ecology, 30(1), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Method 1699: pesticides in water, soil, sediment, biosolids, and tissue by HRGC/ HRMS EPA-821-R-08-001. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology Engineering and Analysis Division.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, M. (2007). Background on the management of obsolete pesticide stockpiles in the Caribbean. Washington: OAS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food ProductionUWISt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago
  2. 2.FAO Sub-Regional Office for the CaribbeanChrist ChurchBarbados
  3. 3.Plant Production and Protection Division (AGPMC)FAO HQRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations