Chesapeake Bay’s “forgotten” Anacostia River: eutrophication and nutrient reduction measures
The Anacostia River, a Chesapeake Bay tributary running through Washington, D.C., is small but highly polluted with nutrients and contaminants. There is currently a multi-billion dollar tunnel project underway, being built in several phases, aimed at diverting effluent to sewage treatment, especially during high flow periods, and improving water quality of the Anacostia and the river into which it flows, the Potomac. Here, 4 years of biweekly to monthly nutrient and phytoplankton data are analyzed to assess pre-tunnel eutrophication status and relationships to flow conditions. Under all flow conditions, nutrients prior to tunnel implementation were well in excess of values normally taken to be limiting for growth, and hypoxia was apparent during summer. Chlorophyll a was higher in summer (averaging 26.9 μg L−1) than in spring (averaging 14.8 μg L−1), and based on pigment composition, summer communities had proportionately more cyanobacteria (> 2-fold higher zeaxanthin to chlorophyll a ratios) compared to spring, which had proportionately more diatoms (> 2-fold higher fucoxanthin to chlorophyll a ratios). When all data from all years and sites were considered, there was a decrease in diatoms and increase in cyanobacteria with decreasing NO3− and increasing NH4+ concentrations, increasing ratios of NH4+ to NO3−, and increasing temperature. Tunnel implementation and associated nutrient reductions may reduce the severity of summer blooms but reductions of spring assemblages may be even greater because river flows are typically higher at that time of year.
KeywordsWastewater treatment Combined sewer overflow Nutrient pollution Cyanobacteria Flow relationships
Y. Shangguan, A. Robinson , K. Schouten, A. Hines, E. Flores, L. Zager, M. Rubaiyat, G. Vazquez, K. Callahan, D. Lundberg and A. Salazar are thanked for their help in collecting samples in the field and work in the lab. The collaboration with T. Sherard and the Anacostia Riverkeeper made the biweekly sampling possible. We also appreciate the help of M. Maddox and the Horn Point Analytical Services Laboratory for the HPLC analyses. Harry Nelson (Fluid Imaging Technologies) is thanked for the use of the FlowCam in summer 2014. Two reviewers provided helpful comments for which we are thankful. This study was supported by grants from the DC Water Resources Research Institute (#2013DC154B, 2016DC176B, 2017DC193B), Maryland Sea Grant (#SA75281870-K, #SA7528112-AA), and the Explorers Club Washington Group. This is contribution number 5541 from the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science.
- American Public Health Association (APHA). (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA Method, 4500-P.Google Scholar
- Anacostia Watershed Society. 2018. State of the Anacostia River. https://www.anacostiaws.org/what-we-do/public-policy-advocacy/state-of-the-river-report-card/2018-state-of-the-anacostia-river-full-report.html. Accessed 27 Sept 2018.
- Behm, P., A. Buckley, & Schultz C.L. (2003). TAM/WASP toxics screening level model for the tidal portion of the Anacostia River: Final report. D.C. Department of Health, Environmental Health Administration, Bureau of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division.Google Scholar
- Cerco, C.F., S.-C. Kim, & M.R. Noel. (2010). The 2010 Chesapeake Bay eutrophication model. A report to the US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program and to the US Army Engineering Baltimore District. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_55318.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.
- Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP). (2002). The state of the Chesapeake Bay: A report to the citizens of the Bay region. Annapolis, MD. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/0659_001.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2016.
- District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water). (2002). Combined sewage system long term control plan: Final report. https://www.dcwater.com/sites/default/files/Complete%20LTCP%20For%20CD.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2016.
- District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water). (2011). DC Water breaks ground on $2.6 billion clean rivers project- largest construction project since building of metro. https://www.dcwater.com/whats-going-on/news/dc-water-breaks-ground-26-billion-clean-rivers-project-largest-construction. Accessed 28 April 2016.
- District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water). (2017). Clean water projects. https://www.dcwater.com/projects. Accessed 18 May 2017.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2010). Nutrients in estuaries: A summary report of the National Estuarine Experts Workgroup 2005–2007. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/nutrients-in-estuaries-november-2010.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2016). Urban waters and the Anacostia watershed. DC/Maryland: Washington https://www.epa.gov/urbanwaterspartners/urban-waters-and-anacostia-watershed-washington-dcmaryland. Accessed 28 April 2016.Google Scholar
- Glibert, P. M., Wilkerson, F., Dugdale, R. C., Raven, J. A., Dupont, C. L., Leavitt, P. R., Parker, A. E., Burkholder, J. M., & Kana, T. M. (2016). Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions. Limnology and Oceanography, 61, 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harding, L. W., Batiuk, R. A., Fisher, T. R., Gallegos, C. L., Malone, T. C., Miller, W. D., Mulholland, M. R., Paerl, H. W., Perry, E. S., & Tango, P. (2014). Scientific bases for numerical chlorophyll criteria in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts, 37, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9656-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harding, L. W., Mallonee, M. E., Perry, E. S., Miller, W. D., Adolf, J. E., Gallegos, C. L., & Paerl, H. W. (2016). Variable climatic conditions dominate recent phytoplankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay. Scientific Reports, 6, Aarticle no. 23773. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (IAN UMCES). (2008). Methods: Microcystis blooms- HAB, Ecocheck newsletter. http://ian.umces.edu/ecocheck/forecast/chesapeake-bay/2009/methods. Accessed 26 June 2017.
- Jackson, M. (2016). Phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics with a focus on nitrogen form in the Anacostia River, in Washington, D.C. and West Lake, in Hangzhou, China. Masters of science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
- Jassby, A. (2008). Phytoplankton in the upper San Francisco estuary: Recent biomass trends, their causes and their trophic significance. San Francisco estuary and watershed science 6.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, S. W., & Vesk, M. (1997). Introduction to marine phytoplankton and their pigment signatures. In S. W. Jeffrey, R. F. C. Mantoura, & S. W. Wright (Eds.), Phytoplankton pigments in oceanography: Guidelines to modern methods. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, S. W., & Wright, S. W. (1994). Photosynthetic pigments in the haptophyta. In J. C. Green, B. S. C. Leadbeater, & B.S.C (Eds.), The haptophyte algae (pp. 111–132). Oxford: Clarendon press.Google Scholar
- Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). (2012). Maryland’s final 2012 integrated report of surface-water quality. http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Water/TMDL/Integrated303dReports/Pages/2012_IR.aspx. Accessed 28 April 2016.
- Miller, C. V., Chanat, J.G., & Bell, J.M. (2013). Water quality in the Anacostia River, Maryland and Rock Creek, Washington, D.C.: Continuous and discrete monitoring with simulations to estimate concentrations and yields of nutrients, suspended sediment, and bacteria. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1034. 37. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1034/. Accessed 28 April 2016.
- Najjar, R. G., Walker, H. A., Anderson, P. J., Barron, E. J., Bord, R. J., Gibson, J. R., Kennedy, V. S., Knight, C. G., Megonigal, J. P., O'Connor, R. E., Polsky, C. D., Psuty, N. P., Richards, B. A., Soreson, L. G., Steele, E. M., & Swanson, R. S. (2000). The potential impacts of climate change on the mid- Atlantic coastal region. Climate Research, 14, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Najjar, R. G., Pyke, C. R., Adams, M. B., Breitburg, D., Kemp, M., Hershner, C., Howarth, R., Mulholland, M., Paolisso, M., Secor, D., Sellner, K., Wardrop, D., & Wood, R. (2010). Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 86, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Hare, M. T., Baattrup-Pederson, A., Baumgarte, I., Freeman, A., Gunn, I. D. M., Lázár, A. N., Sinclair, R., Wade, A. J., & Bowes, M. J. (2018). Responses of aquatic plants to eutrophication in rivers: A revised conceptual model. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parsons, T. R., Maita, Y., & Lalli, C. M. (1984). A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Schaffranek, R.W. (1987). A flow-simulation model of the tidal Potomac River. A water-quality study of the tidal Potomac River and Estuary. United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2234-D. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2234d/report.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2017.
- Shangguan, Y., Glibert, P. M., Alexander, J. A., Madden, C. J., & Murasko, S. (2017). Phytoplankton community response to changing nutrients in Florida Bay: Results of mesocosm studies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 494, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.embe.2017.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC). (2000). Interpretive summary of existing data relevant to potential contaminants of concern within the Anacostia River watershed. New York: Syracuse Research Corporation.Google Scholar
- Van Damme, S., Dehairs, F., Tackx, M., Beaichard, O., Struyf, E., Grisholt, B., Cleemput, O., & Meier, P. (2009). Tidal exchange between a freshwater tidal marsh and an impacted estuary: The Schelt estuary, Belgium. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 85, 197–207 et al. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, H., Wang Z., Loftis D., & Teng Y.-C. (2013). Hydrodynamic and water quality modeling and TMDL development for Maryland’s Coastal Bays system. Maryland Department of the Environment. http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Water/TMDL/ApprovedFinalTMDLs/Documents/MD_Coastal_Bays_nutrient_TMDL/WQM_report_031114_final.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.
- Warner, A., Shepp, D. L., Corish, K., & Galli, J. (1997). An existing source assessment of pollutants to the Anacostia watershed. D.C.: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG), Final Report, Washington.Google Scholar
- Wennersten, J. R. (2008). Anacostia: The death and life of an American river. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar