To be “a developed country” or not to be? The effect of the Paris agreement on Turkish forest law
- 94 Downloads
The Paris Agreement (PA), which is an important step toward mitigating climate change, has ascribed new responsibilities to the signatory parties that differ from those of the Kyoto Protocol (KP). This study is focused on the new responsibilities and the reasons why Turkey has not yet assigned the agreement into its own domestic law, although it was signed on April 22, 2016. There are several political and legal reasons for this, but the most important is Turkey’s membership in the OECD as a developed country. Besides, developing countries shall be supported by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) at a $100 billion budget per year. Turkey needs GCF support in terms of technology transfer, capacity building, and financial in order to achieve the agreement’s goals. Turkey has demanded privileged status similar to the one in the KP, i.e., whether or not to be deemed as a developed country.
The core aim of the PA is to keep global temperature increases below 20 °C by the year 2030, insomuch as to limit temperature increases even further to 1.50 °C. This goal depends on the mitigation of CO2 levels, which means that countries should mitigate GHG emissions caused by deforestation and take further actions by primarily abandoning fossil fuels, improving/attaching importance to energy efficiency, and changing/improving land use planning. Within this context, the second part of the study analyzes the efficiency level of forestry legislation and Turkey’s climate policies in terms of the responsibilities to be assigned by the PA. The analysis is based on the question as to what extent the Turkish forestry legislation fulfills the responsibilities ascribed by the PA for preventing deforestation. Consequently, it has been concluded that eight criteria determined by the PA are not adequately included in the Turkish forestry legislation and shall require an amendment on a large scale, particularly when Turkey is deemed as a developed country.
KeywordsTurkey Paris agreement Climate change Forests Development
- Ayanoğlu, S. (1995). Orman ve çevre üzerinde olumsuz etki yaratan yasal düzenlemeler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1–2), 53–60.Google Scholar
- Bilder, R. B. (1980). International law and natural resources policies. Natural Resources Journal, 20, 451.Google Scholar
- ÇŞB, (2011). Türkiye Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, İklim Değişikliği Ulusal Eylem Planı 2010–2023. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/docs/iklim-degisikligi/ideptr.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (Date of access 19.02.2019).
- ÇŞB, (2019). Türkiye Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/Turkiye-Iklim-Degisikligi-Stratejisi.pdf (Date of access 19.02.2019).
- Engin, B. (2010). İklim Değişikliği ile Mücadelede Uluslararası İşbirliğinin Önemi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (2), 71–82.Google Scholar
- Fleming, J. R. (2007). Te Callendar Effect. Published by the American Meteorological Society. ISBN 978-1-878220-76-9.Google Scholar
- Housman, R. F. (1994). International environmental law and industrial ecology. The greening of industrial ecosystems, 108–122.Google Scholar
- Henderson-Sellers, J. A. (1990). History of the greenhouse effect. Progress in Physical Geography, 14(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Höhne, N., Ellermann, C., & Li, L. (2014). Intended nationally determined contributions under the UNFCCC. Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
- Karakaya, E., & Sofuoğlu, E. (2015). İklim Değişikliği Müzakerelerine Bir Bakış: 2015 Paris İklim Zirvesi. Uluslararası Avrasya Enerji Sorunları Sempozyumu, 28–30.Google Scholar
- Klein, D., Carazo, M. P., Doelle, M., Bulmer, J., & Higham, A. (Eds.). (2017). The Paris agreement on climate change: analysis and commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Levin, K., Rich, D., Bonduki, Y., Comstock, M., Tirpak, D., Mcgray, H., et al. (2015). Designing and preparing intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., & Shaw, D. (1994). The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 753–771.Google Scholar
- Miranda, L. A. (2012). The role of international law in intrastate natural resource allocation: sovereignty, human rights, and peoples-based development. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 45, 785–840.Google Scholar
- OGM (2015). Türkiye Orman Varlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, https://ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Yayinlar/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Orman%20Varl%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1-2016-2017.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2018.
- OSİB, (2015). Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Çölleşme ile Mücadele Ulusal Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı, http://www.cem.gov.tr/erozyon/Files/00000000ulusalstratejibelgesi2015-2023/CEM%20STJ%20EYLEM%20PLANI%202015xBASKISON.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2019.
- Richards, M., Bruun, T. B., Campbell, B. M., Gregersen, L. E., Huyer, S., Kuntze, V., ... & Vasileiou, I. (2016). How countries plan to address agricultural adaptation and mitigation: an analysis of intended nationally determined contributions. CCAFS dataset.Google Scholar
- Salawitch, R.J., Canty, T.P., Hope, A.P., Tribett, W.R., Bennett, B.F. (2017). Paris climate agreement: beacon of Hope. Springer Climate, Open Access.Google Scholar
- Stua, M. (2017). From the Paris agreement to a low-carbon Bretton woods: rationale for the establishment of a mitigation alliance. Springer.Google Scholar
- TIPIG, (2013). İklim Değişikliği Eylem Planı Değerlendirme Raporu, https://tr.boell.org/sites/default/files/tipig_idep_raporu.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2018.
- Türkeş, M., Sümer, U. M.. Ve Çetiner, G. (2000). Küresel iklim değişikliği ve olası etkileri, Çevre Bakanlığı, Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi Seminer Notları (13 Nisan 2000, İstanbul Sanayi Odası), 7–24, ÇKÖK Gn. Md., Ankara.Google Scholar
- URL-1, (2019). International Protection of Nature and Wildlife, http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=210. Accessed 20 February 2019.
- URL 2, (2015). http://www4.unfccc.int/Submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Turkey/1/The_INDC_of_TURKEY_v.15.19.30.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2018.
- URL-3, (2017). http://yesilekonomi.com/almanya-turkiye-icin-arabuluculuk-yapacak. Accessed 15 October 2018.
- Velioğlu, N. 2006. Types of forest property and their characteristics. 8th International Symposium on Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings Book p:231–237. İstanbul.Google Scholar
- Vij, S., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Uzzaman, A., Bhadwal, S., Biesbroek, R., ... & Saeed, B. A. (2017). Climate adaptation approaches and key policy characteristics: cases from South Asia. Environmental Science & Policy, 78, 58–65.Google Scholar
- Weiss, E. B. (1992). International environmental law: contemporary issues and the emergence of a New World Order. Georgetown Law Journal, 81, 675.Google Scholar
- World Economic Situation and Prospects. (2019). https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP2019_BOOK-web.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2019.