Advertisement

Characterization of metal/metalloid concentrations in fjords and bays on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska

  • S. Ian HartwellEmail author
  • Doug Dasher
  • Terri Lomax
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

A baseline environmental characterization of Chrome and Dogfish bays on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, was conducted using a sediment quality triad approach. Resident fish and blue mussel body burdens were also assessed. The data was derived from a larger study that assessed seven distinct water bodies on the Kenai Peninsula’s north side, draining into Kachemak Bay. Sampling sites for water quality measurements and sediment were randomized within each embayment. Concentrations of 140 organic and elemental contaminants were analyzed. Habitat parameters (depth, salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, sediment grain size, and organic carbon content) that influence elemental distribution were also measured at each sampling site. Chrome Bay and Dogfish Bay open into lower Cook Inlet and had coarser sediments than the other bays studied. Concentrations of chromium and nickel were extremely high in Chrome Bay. Concentrations were several times higher than observed concentrations seen throughout other locations in south-central Alaska. Other elemental concentrations varied between and within bays, with several locations exceeding lower sediment quality guidelines. Whole sediment amphipod toxicity bioassays were conducted with sediments from Chrome Bay. No sample exhibited significant mortality or sublethal effects. Body burdens of three species of fish and mussels collected in Chrome Bay did not exhibit elevated concentrations relative to other studies in Kachemak Bay or the Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Fish Monitoring Program. Despite the very high concentrations of Cr and Ni in the sediments, the metals do not appear to be bioavailable to resident biota.

Keywords

Kenai Peninsula, AK Metal contaminants Chromium Nickel Toxicity Body burden 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Kachemak Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve and NCCOS Kasitsna Bay Lab provided essential logistical support. Hans Pedersen and Mike Geagel supported all field missions and vessel operations.

References

  1. ADEC. (2008). 18 AAC 75: Oil and other hazardous substances pollution control (as amended through October 9, 2008). Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Environmental conservation.Google Scholar
  2. Alaska Department of Labor (2019). Alaska population estimates. http://live.laborstats.alaska.gov/pop/
  3. Apeti, D.A., S.I. Hartwell, W.E. Johnson and G.G. Lauenstein. 2012. National Status and Trends Bioeffects Program: field methods. NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment. NOAA NCCOS Technical Memorandum 135. Silver Spring, MD. 27Google Scholar
  4. Apeti, D.A., S.I. Hartwell, S.M. Myers, J. Hetrick, and J. Davenport. 2013. Assessment of contaminant body burdens and histopathology of fish and shellfish species frequently used for subsistence food by Alaskan Native communities. North Pacific Research Board Final Report 74Google Scholar
  5. ASTM. 2004. Standard test method for measuring the toxicity of sediment-associated contaminants with estuarine and marine invertebrates. ASTM Standard Method No. EI 367-03e I. In: 2004 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, volume 11.05, Biological effects and environmental fate; biotechnology; pesticides. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
  6. Brabets, T.P., Nelson, G.L., Dorava, J.M,, and Milner, A.M. (1999). Water-quality assessment of the Cook Inlet Basin, Alaska – environmental setting. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4025.Google Scholar
  7. Burrel D.C. 1979. Distribution and dynamics of heavy metals in Alaskan shelf environments subject to oil development. Pp 326 -546. In Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf. Final Report Volume V. Receptors – Microbiology contaminant Baselines. U.S. DOC NOAA. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  8. CEAD (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District). 2007. Homer Small Boat Harbor and Coast Guard Dock Homer, Alaska. Dredged material management plan environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. Homer, Alaska, August, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Flores, R.M., Stricker, G.D. and Kinney, S.A. 2004. Alaska, coal geology, resources, and coalbed methane potential. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. DDS-77, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, A.C. 1922. Chromite of Kenai Peninsula, AK. U.S. Geological Survey Bulleting No. 742.Google Scholar
  11. Guild, P.W. 1941. Chromite deposits of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin No. 931-G.Google Scholar
  12. Hartwell, S. I., & Hameedi, M. J. (2006). Habitat conditions and correlations of sediment quality triad indicators in Delaware Bay. J. Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartwell, S.I. and Hameedi, J. 2007. Magnitude and extent of contaminated sediment and toxicity in Chesapeake Bay. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS/NCCOS/CCMA 47. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, MD, 234Google Scholar
  14. Hartwell, S.I., Hameedi, J., and, Harmon M. 2001. Magnitude and extent of contaminated sediment and toxicity in Delaware Bay. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS/NCCOS/CCMA 148. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, MD, 107Google Scholar
  15. Hartwell, S.I., Apeti, D., Claflin, L.W., Johnson, W.E. and Kimbrough, K. 2009. Sediment quality triad assessment in Kachemak Bay: characterization of soft bottom benthic habitats and contaminant bioeffects assessment. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 104. 170pp. NOAA, NOS, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  16. Hartwell, S.I., Apeti, A.D., Pait, A.S., Radenbaugh, T., and Britton, R. 2016. Bioeffects assessment in Kvichak and Nushagak Bay, Alaska: characterization of soft bottom benthic habitats, fish body burdens and sediment contaminant baseline assessment. North Pacific Research Board Final Report 1315, 92.Google Scholar
  17. Hartwell, S.I., Dasher, D., Lomax, T. 2017. Characterization of benthic habitats and contaminant assessment in Kenai Peninsula fjords and bays. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 221. Silver Spring, MD. 66. doi: https://doi.org/10.7289/V5/TM-NOS-NCCOS-221
  18. Kimbrough, K. L., and Lauenstein, G.G., eds. 2006. Trace metal analytical methods of the National Status and Trends Program: 2000–2006. US Dept. Comm., NOAA Technical Memorandum 29, NOS NCCOS, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  19. Long, E. R. (2000). Spatial extent of sediment toxicity in U.S. estuaries and marine bays. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Long, E.R. and L.G. Morgan 1990. The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Tech. Memo NOS OMA 52. NOAA, Seattle, WA. 175Google Scholar
  21. Long, E. R., MacDonald, D. D., Smith, S. L., & Calder, F. D. (1995). Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental Management, 19, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long, E. R., Robertson, A., Wolfe, D. A., Hameedi, J., & Sloane, G. M. (1996). Estimates of the spatial extent of sediment toxicity in major U.S. estuaries. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(12), 3585–3592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matschullat, J. (2000). Arsenic in the geosphere – a review. The Science of the Total Environment, 249, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norman, S.A. (2011). Anthropogenic and environmental stressors in Cook Inlet beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). NMFS Contract No. HA133F-10-SE-3639, NOAA Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service, Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
  25. O’Connor, T. P. (2002). National distribution of chemical concentrations in mussels and oysters in the USA. Martine environmental Research, 53, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Obrist, D., Agnan, Y., Jiskra, M., Olson, C., Dominique, P. C., Hueber, J., Moore, C. E., Sonke, E. J., & Helmig, D. (2017). Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution. Nature., 547, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pait, A.S., Warner, R.A., Hartwell, S. I, Nelson, J.O., Pacheco, P.A., and Mason, A. 2006. Human use pharmaceuticals in the estuarine environments: a survey of the Chesapeake Bay, Biscayne Bay and the Gulf of the Farallones. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS/NCCOS/CCMA 7, Sept., 2006, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, MD, 21Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, D.E. and Abel, K.H. 1990. Natural distribution and environmental background of trace heavy metals in Alaskan shelf and estuarine areas. In Outer continental shelf environmental assessment program. Final Report Volume 69. Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar
  29. Saupe, S.M., Gendron, J., and Dasher, D. 2005. The condition of southcentral Alaska coastal bays and estuaries. A statistical summary for the National Coastal Assessment Program Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, MARCH 15, 2006.Google Scholar
  30. Turgeon, D.D., Hameedi J., Harmon, M.R, Long, E.R., McMahon, K.D., and White, H.H. 1998. Sediment toxicity in U.S. coastal waters. Special report, NOAA, National Status and Trends Program. Silver Spring, Maryland. 20 pp.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1991. Methods for determination of metals in environmental samples. EPA-600/4-91-010, Office of Research & Development, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1994. Methods for assessing the toxicity of sediment associated contaminants with estuarine and marine amphipods, EPA-600/R-94/025. Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Environmental protection Agency (EPA). 2005. Coastal condition report for Alaska, Hawaii and island territories. National Coastal Condition Report II. pp 215–246.Google Scholar
  34. USGS, 1999. Mineral Resources > Online Spatial Data > Alaska Resource Data File (ARDF). http://mrdata.usgs.gov/ardf/show-ardf.php?ardf_num=SV015.
  35. Walsh, P. R., Duce, R. A., & Fasching, J. L. (1979). Considerations of the enrichment, sources, and flux of arsenic in the troposhpere. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 84-C4, 1719–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolfe, R.J. 1996. Subsistence food harvests in rural Alaska and food safety issues. Proceeding of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences Committee on Environmental Justice, Spokane, WA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Coastal Monitoring and AssessmentSilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations