Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran
- 232 Downloads
This study assessed the available status of waste management system in Ahvaz and its impact on the environment, as well as seven other scenarios in order to quantitatively calculate potential environmental impacts by utilizing the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. These scenarios were as follows: scenario 1: landfilling without biogas collection; scenario 2: landfilling with biogas collection; scenario 3: composting and landfilling without biogas collection; scenario 4: recycling and composting; scenario 5: composting and incineration; scenario 6: anaerobic digestion, recycling, and landfilling; scenario 7: anaerobic digestion and incineration. Emissions were calculated by the integrated waste management (IWM) model and classified into five impact categories: resource consumption, global warming, acidification potential, photochemical oxidation, and eco-toxicity. In terms of resource consumption and the depletion of non-renewable resources, the third scenario showed the worst performance due to its lack of any recycling, energy recovery, and conversion to energy. In terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the effect on global warming, scenario 1 and scenario 2 showed that disposing the whole amount of waste resulted in the most amount of greenhouse gases produced. Moreover, 50% gas and energy recovery from landfills, in comparison with the non-recovery method, reduced the index of global warming by 12%. Finally, scenarios which were based on producing energy from waste showed a reasonably positive performance in terms of greenhouse gases emissions and the influence on global warming.
KeywordsLife cycle assessment Municipal solid waste Waste management Ahvaz city
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amin, M. M., & Moazzam, M. M. A. (2016). Use of a UV/H2O2 process for posttreatment of a biologically treated composting leachate. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 38(3), 404–410.Google Scholar
- Ibáñez-Forés, V., Bovea, M. D., Coutinho-Nóbrega, C., de Medeiros-García, H. R., & Barreto-Lins, R. (2018). Temporal evolution of the environmental performance of implementing selective collection in municipal waste management systems in developing countries: a Brazilian case study. Waste Management, 72, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mavrotas, G., Gakis, N., Skoulaxinou, S., Katsouros, V., & Georgopoulou, E. (2015). Municipal solid waste management and energy production: consideration of external cost through multi-objective optimization and its effect on waste-to-energy solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1205–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Bayat, R., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Afrasyabi, H., & Chau, K.-w. (2017). Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management-a case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rana, R., Ganguly, R., & Gupta, A. K. (2019). Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid-waste management strategies in Tricity region of India. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Roumak, V. S., Levenkova, E. S., Umnova, N. V., Popov, V. S., Turbabina, K. A., & Shelepchikov, A. A. (2018). The content of dioxins and furans in soils, bottom sediments of water bodies, and tissues of small mammals near the landfill site with municipal solid wastes (Moscow, Russia). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29379–29386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yi, S., & Jang, Y.-C. (2016). Life cycle assessment of solid refuse fuel production from MSW in Korea. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 1–24.Google Scholar