Advertisement

Temporal variability of suspended solids in construction runoff and evaluation of time-paced sampling strategies

  • Raja Umer Sajjad
  • Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado
  • Imran Salim
  • Sheeraz Memon
  • Chinzorig Sukhbaatar
  • Chang-Hee LeeEmail author
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The construction sites have been considered the type of land use with the highest pollution potential, especially due to the erosion of exposed soil surfaces. The runoff monitoring of the construction site was carried out since June 2011 through December 2015. Based on land use land cover (LULC) classification, the monitoring period was divided into active and post-construction phases. Total suspended solids (TSS) showed evident inter-phase variability in average annual event mean concentration (AAEMC) and wash-off pattern. We suggested that stringent runoff control measures should be adopted during active construction phase. Similarly, Personalized Computer Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM) was applied to evaluate the performance of the time-paced discrete and composite sampling scheme in continuously changing LC scenario. It was found that even though the time-paced composite sampling scheme is more cost effective, it showed lower performance in EMC estimation when compared with the time-paced discrete sampling approach. The results also showed that the storm event monitored at a time discrete frequency of 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min, the maximum expected mean bias will be under the accepted level of 10% of the true EMC value. We concluded that construction phase-specific modifications in sampling scheme provides a view to generate near accurate estimates.

Keywords

Stormwater Sampling design Land use Modeling Mass emission 

Notes

Authorship contributions

The conception and design of the study was performed by Raja Umer Sajjad and Prof. Chang-Hee Lee. The field data acquisition and laboratory analysis were performed by Raja Umer Sajjad, Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado, Imran Salim, Sheeraz Memon, and Chinzorig Sukhbaatar. The construction, calibration and validation of PCSWMM model used in this study was performed by Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado. The analysis and interpretation of the data and drafting of the manuscript was done by Raja Umer Sajjad, whereas Prof. Chang-Hee Lee revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual contents. All authors (Raja Umer Sajjad, Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado, Imran Salim, Sheeraz Memon, Chinzorig Sukhbaatar, and Chang-Hee Lee) approved this version of the manuscript to be submitted.

Funding

This study was supported by the Korea Environmental Technology and Industrial Institute as the Next Generation Eco-Innovation Project (No. 413-111-003). This research was also part of the project entitled “Development of Integrated Estuarine Management System”, (No. 20140431), funded by the Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Caltrans. (2002). Caltrans construction sites runoff characterization study: monitoring seasons 1998–2002. Report no. CTSW-RT-02-055.Google Scholar
  2. Chong, M. N., Aryal, R., Sidhu, J., Tang, J., Toze, S., & Gardner, T. (2011). Urban stormwater quality monitoring: from sampling to water quality analysis. 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.Google Scholar
  3. Delkash, M., Al-Faraj, F. A., & Scholz, M. (2018). Impacts of anthropogenic land use changes on nutrient concentrations in surface waterbodies: a review. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water, 46(5), 1800051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giacomoni, M., Gomez, R., & Berglund, E. (2014). Hydrologic impact assessment of land cover change and stormwater management using the hydrologic footprint residence. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50(5), 1242–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Granato, G. E., Zenone, C., Cazenas, P. A. (2002). National highway runoff water-quality data and methodology synthesis, volume I—technical issues for monitoring highway runoff and urban stormwater (p. 479). U.S. Geological survey technical report FHWA-EP-02-007.Google Scholar
  6. Harmel, R. D., & King, K. W. (2005). Uncertainty in measured sediment and nutrient flux in runoff from small agricultural watersheds. Transactions of the ASAE, 48(5), 1713–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harmel, R. D., Smith, D. R., King, K. W., & Slade, R. M. (2009). Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: a software tool for monitoring and modeling applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(7), 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helmschrot, J., & Flugel, W. A. (2002). Land use characterization and change detection analysis for hydrological model parameterization of large scale afforested areas using remote sensing. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27(9–10), 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hur, J., Schlautman, M. A., Templeton, S. R., Karanfil, T., Post, C. J., Smink, J. A., Song, H., Goddard, M. A., Klaine, S. J., & Hayes, J. C. (2008). Does current management of stormwater runoff adequately protect water resources in developing catchments? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63(2), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jensen, J. R. (2005). Introductory digital image processing a remote sensing perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc..Google Scholar
  11. Jmaes, W., Roosman, L. E., & James, W. R. C. (2010). Water system models: User’s guide to SWMM 5 (13th ed.). Guelph, Ontario, Canada: CHI Press Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Kayhanian, M., Murphy, K., Regenmorter, L., & Haller, R. (2001). Characteristics of storm-water runoff from highway construction sites in California. Transportation Research Record, 1743, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, K. W., & Harmel, R. D. (2003). Considerations in selecting a water quality sampling strategy. Transactions of ASAE, 46(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, H., Swamikannu, X., Radulescu, D., Kim, S.-J., & Stenstrom, M. K. (2007). Design of stormwater monitoring programs. Water Research, 41, 4186–4196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leecaster, M. K., Schiff, K., & Tiefenthaler, L. L. (2002). Assessment of efficient sampling designs for urban stormwater monitoring. Water Research, 36, 1556–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Madarang, K., & Kang, J.-H. (2013). Accuracy of a stormwater monitoring program for urban land uses. Water Environment Research, 85, 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maharjan, B., Pachel, K., & Loigu, E. (2016). Towards effective monitoring of urban stormwater for better design and management. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 65(3), 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maniquiz, M. C., Lee, S., Lee, E., Kong, D. S., & Kim, L. H. (2009). Unit soil loss rate from various construction sites during a storm. Water Science and Technology, 59(11), 2187–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy, D. T., Deletic, A., Mitchell, V. G., Fletcher, T. D., & Diaper, C. (2008). Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels. Water Research, 42, 1812–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Memon, S. A., Paule, M. A., Lee, B.-Y., Umer, S. R., Sukhbaatar, C., & Lee, C.-H. (2015). Investigation of turbidity and suspended solids behavior in stormwater run-off from different land-uses sites in South Korea. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 3088–3095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mourad, M., Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., & Chebbo, G. (2005). Sensitivity of experimental data of pollutant site mean concentration in stormwater runoff. Water Science & Technology, 51(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nix, S. J. (1994). Urban stormwater modeling and simulation. Boca Raton: Lewis publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Paule- Mercado, M., Lee, B., Memon, S., Umer, S., Salim, I., & Lee, C. (2017). Influence of land development on stormwater runoff from a mixed land use and land cover catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 599-600, 2142–2155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paule, M. A., Ventura, J. S., Memon, S. A., Jahng, D., Kang, J.-H., & Lee, C.-H. (2016). Monitoring and predicting the fecal indicator bacteria concentrations from agricultural, mixed land use and urban stormwater runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 550, 1171–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramsey, M. H. (1998). Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 13(2), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richards, R. P., & Holloway, J. (1987). Monte Carlo studies of sampling strategies for estimating tributary loads. Water Resources Research, 23(10), 1939–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robertson, D. M., & Roerish, E. D. (1999). Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams. Water Resources Research, 35(12), 3747–3759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spotts, J. W. (2011). Turbidity sampling of runoff from construction sites. Presented at the Clear Water Alabama/IECA Roadshow.Google Scholar
  29. Tate, K. W., Dahlgren, R. A., Singer, M. J., Allen-Diaz, B., & Atwill, E. R. (1999). Timing, frequency of sampling affect accuracy of water-quality monitoring. California Agriculture, 53(6), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner, B. L., Meyer, W. B., & Skole, D. L. (1994). Global land-use land-cover change—towards an integrated study. AMBIO, 23(1), 91–95.Google Scholar
  31. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1974). Wastewater sampling methodologies and flow measurement techniques. Surveillance and analysis division.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, M., Zhang, D. Q., Su, J., Dong, J. W., & Tan, S. K. (2018). Assessing hydrological effects and performance of low impact development practices based on future scenarios modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yao, L., Wei, W., & Chen, L. (2016). How does imperviousness impact the urban rainfall-runoff process under various storm cases? Ecological Indicators, 60, 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yuan, Q., Guerra, H., & Kim, Y. (2017). An investigation of the relationships between rainfall conditions and pollutant wash-off from the paved road. Water, 9(4), 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang, J., & Zhang, C. (2014). Quality assurance/quality control in surface water sampling. Quality Assurance & Quality Control of Environmental Field Sampling (pp 76–96) Future Science Ltd, London Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raja Umer Sajjad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado
    • 1
  • Imran Salim
    • 1
  • Sheeraz Memon
    • 3
  • Chinzorig Sukhbaatar
    • 4
  • Chang-Hee Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering and EnergyMyongji UniversityYongin-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceCOMSATS University IslamabadAbbotabadPakistan
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental Engineering and ManagementMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  4. 4.Division of Water Resource and Water Utilization, Institute of Geography and GeoecologyAcademy of ScienceUlaanbaatarMongolia

Personalised recommendations