Evaluation of drainage problems in Antalya Konyaalti parks in the context of landscape engineering
In this study, factors that cause drainage problems in 23 Nisan Park and Mevlana Park have been investigated in the scope of landscape design and landscape engineering. To propose regulations to protect the natural topography and natural drainage lines, evaluations and observations were conducted, and these data were digitized. Water accumulation analyses were performed using field observations, which were used to create a water accumulation analysis map that was compared with water collection area maps created using Arc Hydro extension in ArcGIS. The results show that surface waters accumulate in areas such as pedestrian ways and playgrounds due to deficiencies in landscape design. Surface water quantities were calculated using the rational method. To prevent structural damage and excessive water entry, deep drainage and concrete or grass-covered parabolic surface drainage systems are recommended. Additional suggestions are provided for other studies to be conducted in this regard.
KeywordsDrainage Surface runoff Landscape engineering Methods of drainage
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Unit of Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey (Project Code 2013.02.0121.005).
- Altunkasa, M. F. (2002). Landscape engineering. Çukuroba University, Agriculture, General Publication, (123).Google Scholar
- Dunnett, N., & Hitchmough, J. (2007). The dynamic landscape: design, ecology and management of naturalistic urban planting. Taylor & Francis, ISBN: 978–0415438100, Spon Press Publishing, (49).Google Scholar
- General Directorate of Meteorology (2014). Chart of Antalya City rainfall intensity over time. Ankara: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Meteorology.Google Scholar
- Ismail, B. A. (2010). Hydrological Procedure No: 5. Rational Method of Flood Estimation for Rural Catchments in Peninsular Malaysıa. Division Of Water Resources Management And Hydrology Department Of Irrigation And Drainage Ministry Of Natural Resources And Environment, pp. 19.Google Scholar
- Loucks, D. P., & Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. Cambridge University Press (138).Google Scholar
- Mays, L. (2006). Water resources sustainability. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional ISBN: 978–0071462303, (140).Google Scholar
- Oğuz, D. (1998). A research on the usage of Ankara urban parks as a concept of urban park, PhD thesis Ankara University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00130-4 (220).
- Ostermann, F. O. (2010). Digital representation of park use and visual analysis of visitor activities. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 34(6), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson, D. (2006). The rational method. David B. Thompson Civil Engineering Department Texas Tech University, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21. In Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janero, Brazil.Google Scholar
- United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UN WCED). (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; Document A/42/427. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- Uzun, S. (2005). User satisfaction in rural recreation areas: the example of Bolu Gölcük Forest-recreation area. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University, Master Thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.Google Scholar
- Walker, C. (2004). The public value of urban parks, Urban Institute, (20).Google Scholar