Advertisement

Avifauna conservation and disturbance ecology in a coastal freshwater lagoon

  • Tiago Cruz
  • Joana Lima
  • António Luís
  • Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro
Article

Abstract

This work was developed in Barrinha de Mira Coastal Lagoon, Portugal. The lagoon belongs to the Natura 2000 network. Its main objectives were to monitor aquatic bird species before, during, and after a desorption intervention on this lagoon. Monitoring of waterfowl was carried out to evaluate the monthly variation of birds in Barrinha, in order to obtain useful information for region’s management and planning, as well as for species preservation. In experimental design, it was decided to perform four counts per month in each pond (weekly), to evaluate the effect of increased monitoring effort in relation to previous years. The results revealed that the study area has a significant importance as a wintering zone for water birds. Some species have stable resident populations which, seasonally, see their numbers vary with migratory birds arrival and departure. Another purpose was to verify the influence of desorption intervention on the usual number of individuals by species. The results show that during and after intervention, there was a reduction of birds in the order of 89%, being more visible in the populations of Anas platyrhynchos and Fulica atra.

Keywords

Monitoring Management Mallard Breeding Habitat Desorption 

References

  1. Aerts, R., Lerouge, F., November, E., Lens, L., Hermy, M., & Muys, B. (2008). Land rehabilitation and the conservation of birds in a degraded Afromontane landscape in northern Ethiopia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillie M.G.L. (1991). Marking in marker dates: towards an archaeology with historical precision, World Archaeology. vol. 23 (pg. 233–243).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belting, H. (2009). Experiences from the LIFE project “rewetting of Lake Dümmer lowlands”. Report from the EU LIFE-Nature seminar on restoration of meadow bird habitats. Copenhagen: LIFENature.Google Scholar
  4. Bergin, T. M., Best, L. B., & Freemark, K. E. (1997). An experimental study of predation on artificial nests in roadsides adjacent to agricultural habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 109(3), 437–448.Google Scholar
  5. Brito, J. C., Crespo, E. G., & Paulo, O. S. (1999). Modelling wildlife distributions: logistic multiple regression vs overlap analysis. Ecography, 22, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bugalho, J. F. (1974). Métodos de recenseamento de aves. Direção Geral de Serviços Florestais e Aquícolas. Lisboa: Monumental LDA. Vol. XLI.Google Scholar
  7. Costa, L. T., & Guedes, R. S. (1994). Contagens de Anatídeos Invernantes em Portugal 1992/1993. Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza (p. 14). Lisboa: ICN.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, L. T., & Guedes, R. S. (1996). Contagens de Anatídeos Invernantes em Portugal Continental. Invernos de 1993/94 e 1995/96. Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza (p. 20). Lisboa: ICN.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, L. T., & Rufino, R. (1994). Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal – January 1994. Airo, 5, 8–16.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, L. T., & Rufino, R. (1996a). Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal – January 1995. Airo, 7, 36–43.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, L. T., & Rufino, R. (1996b). Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal – January 1996. Airo, 7, 69–76.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, L. T., & Rufino, R. (1997). Contagens de aves aquáticas em Portugal – January 1997. Airo, 8, 25–32.Google Scholar
  13. Cramp, S., & Simmons, K. E. L. (1977). The birds of Western Paleartic. Vol.1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dhadse, S., Kotangale, J. P., Chaudhari, P. R., & Wate, S. R. (2009). Diversity of birds at Panipat refinery, Haryana (India). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0556-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farinha, J.C. and Costa, H. (1999). Guia de Campo das Aves Aquáticas de Portugal. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  16. Farinha, J.C. and Trindade A. (1994). Contribuição para o Inventário e Caracterização de Zonas Húmidas em Portugal Continental. Publicação MedWet/ICN.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandes, M.J.S. (1999). Modelação e Simulação nas Lagoas de Quiaios. Tese de Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias do Ambiente (especialidade em Modelação Ambiental). Universidade do Algarve, Faro.Google Scholar
  18. Fink, R. D., Lindell, C. A., Morrison, E. B., Zahawi, R. A., & Holl, K. D. (2009). Patch size and tree species influence the number and duration of bird visits in forest restoration plots in southern Costa Rica. Restoration Ecology, 17, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fletcher, R. J., & Koford, R. R. (2003). Changes in breeding bird populations with habitat restoration in northern Iowa. American Midland Naturalist, 150, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gache, C. (2008). Ecological restoration project “Ciobarciu-costuleni” (Iasi— Romania): monitoring of the birds’ fauna evolution. Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 7, 249–259.Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert, G., Gibbons, D. W., & Evans, J. (1998). Bird monitoring methods: a manual of thecniques for key UK species. Cambridge: RSPB in association with British Trust for Ornithonlogy, .Google Scholar
  22. Hoover, J. P. (2009). Effects of hydrologic restoration on birds breeding in forested wetlands. Wetlands, 29, 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, D. H., Nichols, J. D., & Schwartz, M. D. (1992). Population dynamics of breeding waterfowl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Junior, P. C. A. S., Marques, F. C., Lima, M. R., & Anjos, L. (2016). The importance of restoration areas to conserve bird species in a highly fragmented Atlantic forest landscape. Brazil: Department of Animal Biology and Plant, Universidade Estadual de Londrina.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindenmayer, D. B., Knight, E. J., Crane, M. J., Montague-Drake, R., Michael, D. R., & MacGregor, C. I. (2010). What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation, 143, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopes, P., Oliveira, P. and Lobo, F. 1996. Recenceamento da avifauna da Barrinha de Esmoriz – resultados preliminaries. In Farinha, J.C., Almeida, J. and Costa, H. (eds.) I Congresso de Ornitologia da SPEA: 88–90.Google Scholar
  27. MacGregor-Fors, I., Blanco-García, A., & Lindig-Cisneros, R. (2010). Bird community shifts related to different forest restoration efforts: a case study from a managed habitat matrix in Mexico. Ecological Engineering, 36, 1492–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malcom, J. W., & Radke, W. R. (2008). Effects of riparian and wetland restoration on an avian community in Southeast Arizona, USA. The Open Conservation Biology Journal, 2, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore, M. V., Pce, M. L., Mather, J. R., Murdoch, P. S., Howarth, R. W., Folt, C. L., Chen, C. Y., Hemond, H. F., Flebbe, P. A., & Driscoll, C. T. (1998). Potential effects of climate change on freshwater ecosystems of the New England/Mid-Atlantic Region. Hydrological Processes, 11(8), 925–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pereira, R. M. O. (1997). Plano de Ordenamento e Gestão das Lagoas das Braças e da Vela (Centro-Litoral). Coimbra: Tese de Mestrado em Ecologia. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia – Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
  31. Petronilho, J. M. S. (1999). Censos de Ardeídeos na Barrinha de Mira – winters 1994/95 a 1998/99. Airo, 10, 42–46.Google Scholar
  32. Petronilho, J. M. S. (2001). A Fauna do Concelho de Mira. In Mira: Câmara Municipal de Mira.Google Scholar
  33. Petronilho, J. M. S., Vingada, J. V., & Ferreira, M. (2004). Composição e dinâmica anual da avifauna aquática no Sítio Natura 2000 “Dunas de Mira, Gândara e Gafanhas” (Beira Litoral, Portugal). Airo, 14, 105–113.Google Scholar
  34. Petronilho, J. M. S., Rodrigues, P., & Vingada, J. V. (2005). Monitorização de aves aquáticas no Sítio Natura 2000 “Dunas de Mira, Gândara e Gafanhas”. Braga: Sociedade Portuguesa de Vida Selvagem.Google Scholar
  35. Quinn, G., & Keough, M. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabaça, J. E. (1995). Método de Censo de Aves: Aspectos Gerais, Pressupostos e Princípios de Aplicação. Publicação 1. Lisboa: Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves.Google Scholar
  37. Rodrigues, D. J. C. (1998). Dieta estival e risco de saturnismo do Pato-real (Anas platyrhynchos) nos arrozais da Quinta do Canal. Airo, 9, 33–40.Google Scholar
  38. Rodrigues, D.J.C. (2001). Ecologia e ordenamento de populações de Pato-real (Anas platyrhynchos l.) em zonas húmidas de Portugal. Tese de Doutoramento em Engenharia Florestal. ISA - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  39. Rodrigues, P.C. (2006). Monitorização de aves aquáticas no Sítio Natura 2000 “Mira, Gândara, Gafanhas”: Um contributo para a sua gestão. Tese de Mestrado em gestão e conservação da natureza. Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e Ambiente – Universidade do Algarve, Faro.Google Scholar
  40. Rodrigues, D., & Fabião, A. (1997). Loss and change of habitat and possible effects on mallard populations of Mondego and Vouga river basins. In J. B. Gosss-Custard, R. Rufino, & A. S. Luís (Eds.), Effects of Loss and Change of Habitat on Waterbirds (pp. 127–130). London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  41. Rodrigues, D., & Ferreira, M. T. (1993). Summer food and body condition of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos L.) in river Mondego lowlands. Doñana Acta Vertebrata, 20, 87–94.Google Scholar
  42. Rodrigues, D. J. C., Fabião, A. M. D., Figueiredo, M. E. M. A., & Tenreiro, P. J. Q. (2000). Migratory status and movements of the Portuguese mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Vogelwarte, 40, 292–297.Google Scholar
  43. Rodrigues, D. J. C., Figueiredo, M. E. M. A., & Fabião, A. M. D. (2001). Mallard lead poisoning risk in Central Portugal. Wildfowl, 52, 169–174.Google Scholar
  44. Rose, P. M. (1990). Manual for international waterfowl census coordinators. Slimbridge: IWRB.Google Scholar
  45. Rufino, R. (1988). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas – Jan/Fev 1988. Lisboa: CEMPA.Google Scholar
  46. Rufino, R. (1989). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas – Jan/Fev 1989. Lisboa: CEMPA.Google Scholar
  47. Rufino, R. (1990). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas – Inverno de 1987 e 1990. Lisboa: CEMPA.Google Scholar
  48. Rufino, R. (1991). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas Invernantes – Janeiro de 1991. In Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza (p. 4). Lisboa: ICN.Google Scholar
  49. Rufino, R. (1992). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas Invernantes – Janeiro de 1992. Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza (p. 12). Lisboa: ICN.Google Scholar
  50. Rufino, R., & Costa, L. T. (1993). Contagens de Aves Aquáticas em Portugal – Janeiro de 1993. Airo, 4, 57–67.Google Scholar
  51. Smythe, L. A., & Haukos, D. A. (2010). Response of grassland birds in sand shinnery oak communities restored using tebuthiuron and grazing in eastern New Mexico. Restoration Ecology, 18, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teles, F. R., & Guedes, R. S. (1982). Populações de Anatídeos Invernantes em Portugal. Lisboa: CEMPA.Google Scholar
  53. Twedt, D. J., Wilson, R. R., HenneKerr, J. L., & Grosshuesch, D. A. (2002). Avian response to bottomland hardwood reforestation: the first 10 years. Restoration Ecology, 10, 645–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. VanRees-Siewert, K. L., & Dinsmore, J. J. (1996). Influence of wetland age on bird use of restored wetlands in Iowa. Wetlands, 16, 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vingada, J.V., Ferreira, A.J., Keating, A.L., Sousa, J.P., Soares, A.M.V.M., Eira, C., Fonseca, C., Faria, M., Soares, M., Loureiro, S., Sendin, R. & Ferreira, S. (1997). Conservação do Lobo (Canis lupus) em Portugal. Fomento e conservação das principais presas naturais do lobo. Relatório final do protocolo com o ICN, no âmbito do Programa LIFE (Projeto Conservação do Lobo em Portugal). Coimbra. pp. 145.Google Scholar
  56. Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical analysis. London: Prentice Hall International Editions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Biology and CESAM Centre for Environmental and Marine StudiesUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations