Advertisement

Factors influencing the reuse of reclaimed water as a management option to augment water supplies

  • May A. Massoud
  • Arine Kazarian
  • Ibrahim Alameddine
  • Mahmoud Al-Hindi
Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

The reuse of treated wastewater, whether direct or indirect, can raise public concerns as a result of the overall risk perception. As such, community acceptance plays a significant role in the implementation of alternative water systems. Public attitudes towards water reuse are highly influenced by perceived health risk, religious prohibition, political issues, and the degree of human contact with recycled water. In most of the Mediterranean countries, wastewater is reused to different extents either within planned or unplanned schemes. Unfortunately, there are few in-depth studies of the socio-cultural aspects of reuse projects in developing countries, and Lebanon is no exception. Accordingly, this research will comprehensively tackle the issue of public knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance from different perspectives in an effort to provide national baseline information on wastewater reuse that is needed for future regulatory and developmental projects. As such, a survey was developed, tested, and administered. Results showed an inverse relation between the degree of human contact with the treated wastewater and public acceptance. People were found to be more inclined towards reuse for purposes with minimal human contact such as landscaping and agriculture with opposition when it came to use for personal use. Moreover, the results showed a general lack of trust in governing institutions and authorities, which could explain perceived health risks and perceptions of risk resulting from system failure. Overall, the willingness to use treated wastewater was found to vary as a function of the “disgust factor,” religious beliefs, and perceptions of a high risk towards contracting waterborne diseases. The disgust towards reuse of treated wastewater was found to be a strong predictor affecting willingness to reuse whereby those who believed it is disgusting to reuse treated wastewater were found to be on average, three times less likely to reuse treated wastewater as compared to those who did not declare disgust. Similarly, a significant association was found between religious beliefs and respondents’ willingness to use treated wastewater. Interviewees who thought treated wastewater reuse is not religiously accepted were, on average, twice less likely to use treated wastewater as compared to those who did not believe that reuse contradicts with their religious beliefs. Additionally, people’s perceptions on associating the spread of water-borne diseases with reuse were found to be significant. Those who perceived that reusing treated wastewater would lead to diseases and affect the human health, were on average, twice less likely to accept reuse. Developing a comprehensive strategy that integrates increasing awareness and knowledge, setting policies related to water reuse, building public trust and communication channels, increasing public participation/engagement in decision making, and developing a sustainable management framework is thus crucial before any investments are made in reclaimed water-reuse projects.

Keywords

Water reuse Public perception Acceptance Lebanon 

Notes

Funding information

This research project is funded by the American University of Beirut Research Board.

References

  1. Ahmad, S. (1991). Public attitude towards water and water reuse. Water Science & Technology, 23(10–12), 2165–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhumoud, J., & Madzikanda, D. (2010). Public perceptions on water reuse options: the case of Sulaibiya wastewater treatment Plant in Kuwait. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(1), 141–158.Google Scholar
  3. Baggett, S., Jeffrey, P., & Jefferson, B. (2006). Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination, 187(1–3), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakopoulou, S., & Kungolos, A. (2009). Investigation of wastewater reuse potential in Thessaly region, Greece. Desalination, 248, 1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakopoulou, S., Polyzos, S., & Kungolos, A. (2010). Investigation of Farmers’ willingness to pay for using recycled water for irrigation in Thessaly region, Greece. Desalination, 250, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buyukkamcia, N., & Alkan, S. (2013). Public acceptance potential for reuse applications in Turkey. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 80, 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, W., Bai, Y., Zhang, W., Lyu, S., & Jiao, W. (2015). Perceptions of different stakeholders on reclaimed water reuse: the case of Beijing, China. Sustainability, 7, 9696–9710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dishman, C. M., Sherrard, J. H., & Rebhun, M. (1989). Gaining public support for direct potable water reuse. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 115(2), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolnicar, S., & Schafer, A. I. (2009). Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Grun, B. (2011). What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Research, 45, 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drechsel, P., Mahjoub, O., Keraita, B. (2015). Social and cultural dimensions in wastewater use. Chapter 5, In: P. Drechsel, et al. (Ed.), Wastewater: economic asset in an urbanizing world. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht 2015, 86–96. pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
  12. Fielding, K. S., & Roiko, A. H. (2014). Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water. Water Research, 61, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedler, E., Lahav, E., Jizhaki, H., & Lahav, T. (2006). Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 81, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Cuerva, L., Berglund, E., & Binder, A. (2016). Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the U.S. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 113, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gu, Q., Chen, Y., Pody, R., Cheng, R., Zheng, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Public perception and acceptability toward reclaimed water in Tianjin. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurlimann, A. C., & Dolnicar, S. (2016). Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: a comparative study in nine locations. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(4), 650–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurlimann, A. C., Hemphill, E., McKay, J., & Geursen, G. (2008). Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1221–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishikawa, K. (1968). Guide to quality control. Tokyo: JUSE.Google Scholar
  19. Jefferson, B., Palmer, A., Jeffrey, P., & Judd, S. (2004). Grey water characterization and its impact on the selection and operation of technologies for urban reuse. Water Science & Technology, 50(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamizoulis, G., Bahri, A. Brissaud, F. and Angelakis, A. N. (2003). Wastewater recycling and reuse practices in mediterranean region: recommended guidelines. 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Kantanoleon, N., Zampetakis, L., & Manios, T. (2007). Public perspective towards wastewater reuse in a medium size, seaside, Mediterranean City: a pilot survey. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 50, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Education and Physiological Measurement, 30, 607–610.Google Scholar
  23. Lam, S., Nguyen-Viet, H., Thi Tuhey-Hanh, T., Nguyen-Mai, H., & Harper, S. (2015). Evidence for public health risks of wastewater and excreta management practices in Southeast Asia: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 12863–12885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lautze, J., Stander, E. Drechsel, P. Da Silva, A. K. and Keraita, B. (2014). Global experiences in water reuse. Colombo: International water management institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 31p. (resource recovery and reuse series 4).Google Scholar
  25. Leovy, J. (1997). Reclaimed wastewater may ease State’s thirst. Los Angelo’s Times.Google Scholar
  26. Madany, I., Al-Shiryan, A., Lori, I., & Al-Khalifa, H. (1992). Public awareness and attitudes toward various uses of renovated water. Environmental International, 18(5), 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nancarrow, B., Leviston, Z., Po, M., Porter, N., & Tucker, D. (2008). What drives communities’ decisions and behaviors in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 57(4), 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nijhawan, A., Labhasetwar, P., Jain, P., & Rahate, M. (2013). Public consultation on artificial aquifer recharge using treated municipal wastewater. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 70, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Okun, D. A. (2002). Water reuse introduces the need to integrate both water supply and wastewater management at local regulatory levels. Water Science & Technology, 46(6–7), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pham, T. T. N., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Dang, H. P. D., Mainali, B., Johnston, A., & Listowski, A. (2011). Responses of community to the possible use of recycled water for washing machines: a case study in Sydney, Australia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 535–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Po, M., Kaercher, J., & Nancarrow, B. (2003). Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse. Melbourne: CSIRO Land and Water.Google Scholar
  32. Po, M., Nancarrow, B.E., Levistin, Z., Porter, N.B., Syme, G.J. and Kaercher, J.D. (2005). Predicting community behavior in relation to wastewater reuse: what drives decisions to accept or reject? Water for a healthy country National Research Flagship, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth.Google Scholar
  33. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 14 Sept 2017
  34. Rice, J., Wutich, A., White, D., & Westerhoff, P. (2016). Comparing actual de facto wastewater reuse and its public acceptability: a three city case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sims, J. H., & Baumann, D. (1974). Renovated wastewater: the question of public acceptance. Water Resources Research, 10(4), 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme. (2008). Vital water graphics: an overview of the world’s fresh and marine waters, 2nd ed. Retrieved on 23 May, 2015 from http://www.unep.org.
  38. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. igneswaran, V., & Sundaravadivel, M. (2004). Recycle and reuse of domestic wastewater. In S. (. V.). Vigneswaran (Ed.), Wastewater Recycle, Reuse, and Reclamation. Oxford: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Wester, J., Timpano, K. R., Cek, D., & Broad, K. (2016). The psychology of recycled water: factors predicting disgust and willingness to use. Water Resources Research, 52, 3212–3226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wester, J., Kiara, R., Timpano, D., Lieberman, D., Fieldstone, S., & Broad, K. (2015). Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, Z., & Pfaff, B. (2008). Religious, philosophical and environmentalist perspectives on potable wastewater reuse in Durban, South Africa. Desalination, 228(1–3), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Bank. (2010). Improving wastewater use in agriculture: an emerging priority. Energy Transport and Water Department.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • May A. Massoud
    • 1
  • Arine Kazarian
    • 1
  • Ibrahim Alameddine
    • 2
  • Mahmoud Al-Hindi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health SciencesAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon
  3. 3.Department of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations