Towards zero waste production in the paint industry wastewater using an agro-based material in the treatment train

  • S. VishaliEmail author
  • S. K. Roshini
  • M. R. Samyuktha
  • K. Ashish anand


An attempt has been made to evaluate the use of natural, agro-based material, Moringa oleifera as a coagulant in the treatment of recreated water-based paint effluent. The treatment train sequence comprising coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, sand filtration, and membrane filtration was used. The efficiency was evaluated in terms of color and turbidity. The influence of experimental parameters such as eluent type, eluent concentration, coagulant dose, coagulant-eluate volume, initial effluent pH, and initial effluent concentration was examined. The recommended conditions to yield maximum removal efficiency are 80 mL of eluate prepared using 3 g of M. oleifera seed powder and 1 N NaCl, under actual pH, to treat a liter of effluent. The treated supernatant from coagulation unit was passed through a sand filtration setup and a membrane filtration, with a maximum removal of color above 95%. The results affirmed the positive coagulation properties of M. oleifera, which could serve as a better alternative for chemical coagulant. The optimized treatment conditions derived for the recreated paint effluent were applied in the real paint effluent treatment. An opportunity was identified for re-using treated wastewater, as a cooling fluid and a diluting agent for lower quality paints.

The results affirmed the positive coagulation properties of M. oleifera, which could serve as a better alternative for chemical coagulant.

Graphical abstract


Paint industry effluent Moringa oleifera Coagulation Sand filtration Ultra filtration 


  1. Aboulhassan, M. A., Souabi, S., Yaacoubi, A., & Baudu, M. (2006). Improvement of paint effluents coagulation using natural and synthetic coagulant aids. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 138, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akyol, A. (2012). Treatment of paint manufacturing wastewater by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 285, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of waste and wastewater (Sixteenth ed.). New York: American Public Health Associations.Google Scholar
  4. Arquiaga, M. C., Canter, L. W., & Robertson, J. M. (1995). Microbiological characterization of the biological treatment of aircraft paint stripping wastewater. Environmental Pollution, 89(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. A., & Weintraub, M. (1982). Bio oxidation of paint process wastewater. Journal of Water Pollution Control and Federation, 54(7), 1127–1130.Google Scholar
  6. Chun, Y. Y. (2010). Emerging usage of plant based coagulants for water and wastewater treatment. Process Biochemistry, 45(9), 1437–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deya, B. K., Hashim, M. A., Hasan, S., & Sengupta, B. (2004). Microfiltration of water-based paint effluents. Advanced Environmental Research, 8, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flaten, T. P. (2001). Aluminium as a risk factor in Alzheimer’s disease, with emphasis on drinking water. Brain Research Bulletin, 55, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haung, C. P., & Ghadirian, M. (1974). Physical–chemical treatment of paint industry wastewater. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 46(10), 2340–2346.Google Scholar
  10. Kannan, R., Lakshmi, S., Radha, P., Aparna, N., Vishali, S., & Richard Thilagaraj, W. (2016). Biosorption of heavy metals from actual electroplating wastewater using encapsulated Moringa oleifera beads in fixed bed column. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(8), 3572–3587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Korbahti, B. K., & Tanyolac, A. (2009). Electrochemical treatment of simulated industrial paint wastewater in a continuous tubular reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 148(2–3), 444–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Korbahti, B. K., Aktas, N., & Tanyolac, A. (2007). Optimization of electrochemical treatment of industrial paint wastewater with response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Material, 148(1–2), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar, R., & Barakat, M. A. (2013). Decolourization of hazardous brilliant green from aqueous solution using binary oxidized cactus fruit peel. Bioresource Technology, 226(15), 377–383.Google Scholar
  14. Magesh kumar, M., & Karthikeyan, R. (2016). Modelling the kinetics of coagulation process for tannery industry effluent treatment using Moringa oleifera seeds protein. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(32), 14954–14964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansour, M., Sivakumar, S., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2012). Binding of cadmium to S potatorum seed proteins in an aqueous solution: adsorption kinetics and relevance to water purification. Colloids Surface B, 94, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohsen, A. E. L. S., Hasanin, E. A., & Kamel, M. M. (2010). Appropriate technology for industrial wastewater treatment of paint industry. American–Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environment, 8(5), 597–601.Google Scholar
  17. Pamukoglu, M. Y., & Kargi, F. (2006). Removal of copper (II) ions from aqueous medium by biosorption onto powdered waste sludge. Process Biochemistry, 41(5), 1047–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rizzo, L., Gennaro, A. D., Gallo, M., & Belgiorno, V. (2008). Coagulation/chlorination of surface water: a comparison between chitosan and metal salts. Separation Science and Technology, 62, 79–85.Google Scholar
  19. Sengupta, B., Dey, B. K., Hashim, M. A., & Hasan, S. (2004). Micro filtration of water-based paint effluents. International Journal of Environmental Management, 8(3–4), 455–466.Google Scholar
  20. Shanta, S., & Kaul, S. N. (2000). Performance of evaluation of a pure oxygen-based activated sludge system treatment a combined paint industry wastewater and domestic sewage. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 58(4), 445–457.Google Scholar
  21. Verma, A. K., Dash, R., & Bhunia, P. (2012). A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vishali, S., & Karthikeyan, R. (2014). A comparative study of Strychnos potatorum and chemical coagulants in the treatment of paint and industrial effluents: an alternate solution. Separation Science and Technology, 49(16), 2510–2517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vishali, S., & Karthikeyan, R. (2015). Cactus opuntia (ficus-indica): an eco-friendly alternative coagulant in the treatment of paint effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 56(6), 1489–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vishali, S., Rashmi, P., & Karthikeyan, R. (2016). Evaluation of wasted biomaterial, crab shells (Portunus sanguinolentus), as a coagulant, in paint effluent treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(28), 13157–13165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiang, J. M., & Hui, L. X. (2009). Treatment of water based printing ink wastewater by Fenton process combined with coagulation. Journal of Hazardous Material, 162, 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Vishali
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. K. Roshini
    • 1
  • M. R. Samyuktha
    • 1
  • K. Ashish anand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringSRM UniversityKattankulathurIndia

Personalised recommendations