Performance evaluation of oil spill software systems in early fate and trajectory of oil spill: comparison analysis of OILMAP and PISCES 2 in Mersin bay spill
- 86 Downloads
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance level of two advanced oil spill software systems in early transport and fate of oil spill through algorithms accepted in oil spill literature. To do this, the performance level of software systems mostly used in real cases have been compared. OILMAP (the oil spill prediction modeling system) and PISCES 2 (potential incident simulation, control and evaluation system) have been used for spill trajectory in the light of four spill scenarios. The findings reveal that the OILMAP has predicted a relatively larger area of spill. In addition, OILMAP has achieved closer results to the calculations of approaches adopted in the literature for evaporation calculations. Besides, OILMAP software has provided highly reliable results in the evaporation rates of oil compared to the calculations of PISCES 2. On the other hand, as for the determination of the risky area, both software systems have yielded results with high reliability values, which could be used in taking precautions against oil spill in such areas.
KeywordsOILMAP PISCES 2 Oil spill Performance evaluation Mersin Bay
The authors would like to thank Seagull Oil Spill Response Limited and MARSER Ltd. for their help in providing the data and Dokuz Eylul University Maritime Faculty for their support to this study.
- Balas, C. E., & Balas, L. (2002). Risk assessment of some revetments in Southwest Wales, United Kingdom. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 1285, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2002)128:5(216).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- British Petroleum (BP). (2016). Great Australian Bight exploration drilling program Stromlo-1 and Whinham-1 Fate and effects oil spill modeling assumptions, parameters and results. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp-country/en_au/about-us/what-we-do/exploring-greataustralian-bight/fate-effects-oil-spill-modelingassumptions-parameters-results.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2017.
- Buffy, M., Puspa, L., Gregory, M., Edward, B., & Miles, M. S. (2017). Louisiana coastal marsh environments and mc252 oil biomarker chemistry, in oil spill environmental forensics case studies. In S. A. Stout & Z. Wang (Eds.), Oil spill environmental forensics case studies (pp. 737–756). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804434-6.00032-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ciampalini, A., Raspini, F., Bianchini, S., Tarchi, D., Vespe, M., Moretti, S., & Casagli, N. (2016). The Costa Concordia last cruise: the first application of high frequency monitoring based on COSMO-SkyMed constellation for wreck removal. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 112, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coppini, G., De Dominicis, M., Zodiatis, G., Lardner, R., Pinardi, N., Santoleri, R., Colella, S., Bignami, F., Hayes, D. R., Soloviev, D., Georgiou, G., & Kallos, G. (2011). Hindcast of oil-spill pollution during the Lebanon crisis in the eastern Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(1), 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Dominicis, M., Bruciaferri, D., Gerin, R., Pinardi, N., Poulain, P. M., Garreau, P., Zodiatis, G., Perivoilotis, L., Fazioli, L., Sorgente, R., & Manganiello, C. (2016). A multi-model assessment of the impact of currents, waves and wind in modelling surface drifters and oil spill. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 133, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernandes, R., Neves, R., Viegas, C., Leitão P., & Hidromod, L. (2013). Integration of an oil and inert spill model in a framework for risk management of spills at sea: a case study for the Atlantic area. 36th AMOP Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response Proceedings, 4-6.Google Scholar
- Fingas, M. (2010). Oil spill science and technology (1st ed.). USA: Gulf Professional Publishing (Elsevier).Google Scholar
- Fingas, M. (2015). Oil spill science and technology (2nd ed.). USA: Gulf professional publishing (Elsevier).Google Scholar
- French, D. P., Rines, H., & Masciangioli, P. (1997). Validation of an orimulsion spill fates model using observations from field test spills. 20th Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar Proceedings. 1410.Google Scholar
- Hodges, B. R., Orfila, A., Sayol, J. M., & Hou, X. (2015). Operational oil spill modeling: from science to engineering applications in the presence of uncertainty. In M. Ehrhardt (Ed.), Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of oil pollution problems (pp. 99–126). Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Howlett, E., Jayko, K., Isaji, T., Anid, P., Mocke, G., & Smit, F. (2008). Marine forecasting and oil spill modeling in Dubai and the Gulf region. The 31st Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response Proceedings, 1-12.Google Scholar
- IHS (2017). The module of maritime intelligence risk suite: Mediterranean region traffic density and risk visualization. U.K.Google Scholar
- International Maritime Organization (IMO). (1995). Manual on oil pollution. Section 2-contingency planning. London, UK.Google Scholar
- International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited (ITOPF). (2017). Weathering. Technical Information Paper. http://www.itopf.com/knowledge-resources/documents-guides/fate-of-oil-spills/weathering/. Accessed 25 June 2017.
- Juszkiewicz, W., & Lazuga, K. (2011). Simulations to prevent pollution from maritime transport. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) Project Baltic Master 2. http://www.transportportal.se/ShipDocs/2014-01-16rec162242.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2017.
- Kolluru, V., Spaulding, M.L., & Anderson, E., (1994). A three dimensional subsurface oil dispersion model using a particle based technique. 17th Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical Seminar, 767-784.Google Scholar
- Lardner, R., Zodiatis, G., Hayes, D., & Pinardi, N. (2006). Application of the MEDSLIK oil spill model to the Lebanese spill of July 2006. European Group of Experts on Satellite Monitoring of Sea Based Oil Pollution, European Communities, 1018–5593.Google Scholar
- Lazuga, K. (2012). Testing of an oil spill mathematical model contained in PISCES II simulator. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 32(104), 105–109.Google Scholar
- Lazuga, K., Gucma, L., & Perkovic, M. (2013). M/t “Baltic carrier” accident. The reconstruction of oil spill with PISCES II simulator application. Scientific Journals of Maritime University of Szczecin, 36(108), 110–115.Google Scholar
- Lebreton, L. C. M. (2015). Stochastic analysis of deep sea oil spill trajectories in the great Australian bight. Wellington: Cuba.Google Scholar
- Lee, C. (2012). Water-based oil spill modeling software: benefits, requirements & recommendations. Undergraduate Research. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0103539.
- Lehr, W. J. (2001). Review of modeling procedures for oil spill weathering behavior. Advances in Ecological Sciences, 9, 51–90.Google Scholar
- Liu, Z., Liu, J., Zhu, Q., & Wu, W. (2012). The weathering of oil after the deepwater horizon oil spill: insights from the chemical composition of the oil from the sea surface, salt marshes and sediments. Environmental Research Letters, 7(3), 5302. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/035302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackay, D., Buistt, I.A., Marcarenhas, R., & Paterson, S. (1980a). Oil spill processes and models. Environment Canada. Manuscript report no. EE-8. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
- Mackay, D., Paterson S., & Nadeau, S. (1980b). Calculation of the evaporation rate of volatile liquids. National Conference on Control of Hazardous Material Spill, 415–435.Google Scholar
- Marine Services (MARSER Seagull Oil Spill response Limited). (2015). Mersin bay oil spill response plan. Turkey.Google Scholar
- Reed, M., Johansen, Ø., Brandvik, P. J., Dailing, P., Lewis, A., Fiocco, R., Mackay, D., & Prentki, R. (1999). Oil spill modeling towards the close of the 20th century: overview of the state of the art. Spill Science and Technology Bulletin, 5(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-2561(98)00029-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simecek-Beatty, D. (2011). Oil spill trajectory forecasting uncertainty and emergency response. Oil Spill Science and Technology, 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-943-0.10011-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spaulding, M.L., Howlett, E., Anderson, E. & Jayko, K., (1992). OILMAP—a global approach to spill modeling. 15th annual Arctic and marine Oilspill program technical seminar, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
- Stevens, C. C. (2014). Sinking of hydrocarbon mixtures due to evaporative and/or dissolution weathering on the surface and submerged in water. Master of science in chemical engineering, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.Google Scholar
- Transas (2008). PISCES II (version 2.93) Instruction Manual. Transas Ltd. Russia.Google Scholar
- Turkish State Meteorological Service (TSMS) (2014). http://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=B. Accessed 10 Nov 2017.
- Yapa, P. D. (1994). Oil spill processes and model development. Journal and Advanced Marine Technology, 11, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Zodiatis, G., De Dominicis, M., Perivoliotis, L., Radhakrishnan, H., Georgoudis, E., Sotillo, M., Lardner, R. W., Krokos, G., Bruciaferri, D., Clementi, E., Guarnieri, A., Ribotti, A., Drago, A., Bourma, E., Padorno, E., Daniel, P., Gonzalez, G., Chazot, C., Gouriou, V., Kremer, X., Sofianos, S., Tintore, J., Garreau, P., Pinardi, N., Coppini, G., Lecci, R., Pisano, A., Sorgente, R., Fazioli, L., Soloviev, D., Stylianou, S., Nikolaidis, A., Panayidou, X., Karaolia, A., Gauci, A., Marcati, A., Caiazzo, L., & Mancini, M. (2016). The Mediterranean decision support system for marine safety dedicated to oil slicks predictions. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 133, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar