Impact of land cover types on soil aggregate stability and erodibility
- 246 Downloads
Gökçeada is the biggest island, and it is also known as the organic island of Turkey. Approximately 65% of the Gökçeada lands have slope > 12%. Climate, topography, land cover, and soil characteristics are considered to be the main natural factors affecting soil erosion severity in the Gökçeada. Prevention of soil degradation, hence the preservation or improvement of the overall quality of the soil, is directly related to the presence of stable soil aggregates. In addition, the resistance to weathering and replacement of soil particles are also relevant aspects in terms of sustainability. Aggregate stability (AS) and erodibility of land (Kfac) are related to soil properties. However, this relationship can vary under different circumstances. In this study, 248 surface soil samples have been taken from forest and semi-natural areas (FSNA) and agricultural areas (AGRA) according to CORINE 2006. Eleven selected soil properties were measured, and their impacts on AS and Kfac (RUSLE-K) were determined by using the CRT (classification and regression tree) in Gökçeada. Results showed that the relations among soil characteristics changed according to the land cover classes. Total organic carbon is much more associated with AS in AGRA, while total carbon is associated with AS in FSNA. The effect of calcium carbonate on Kfac was higher than other soil properties when the land cover type was ignored. On the other hand, in AGRA, the effect of between clay content on Kfac was greater than those of FSNA.
KeywordsGökçeada Land cover class Soil erodibility Aggregate stability Kfac (RUSLE-K)
This study was supported by the COMU-BAP Project 2012/17.
- Anonymous. (1993). Gökçeada and Bozcaada agricultural devolopment and settlement project (Project Number: 1993A020020).Google Scholar
- Başaran, M., Erpul, G., Tercan, A. E., & Çanga, M. R. (2008). The effects of land use changes on some soil properties in İndağı Mountain Pass–Çankırı, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 136(1–3), 101–119.Google Scholar
- Blake, G. R. (1965). Bulk density. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, 374–390.Google Scholar
- Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. New York: Chapman Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- CORINE. (2006). Coordination of information on the environment. Corine Land Cover, 2006 Raster Data 100 x 100 m - Version 13 (02/2010).Google Scholar
- Grewelling, T., & Peech, M. (1960). Chemical soil test. Cornell University Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 960 p.Google Scholar
- Gupta, O. P. (2002). Water in relation to soils and plants (pp. 31–34). India: Agrobios.Google Scholar
- Hill, T., & Lewicki, P. (2006). Statistics: methods and applications: a comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. Classification trees, Chapter 9, pp 97-114. Tulsa: StatSoft, Inc.Google Scholar
- İlay, R. (2016). Gökçeada Topraklarının Bazı Kalite Parametreleri ve Erozyon Riskinin Belirlenmesi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Çanakkale.Google Scholar
- Kavdir, Y., Özcan, H., Ekinci, H., Yüksel, O., & Yiğini, Y. (2004). The influence of clay content, organic carbon and land use types on soil aggregate stability and tensile strength. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28(3), 155–162.Google Scholar
- Kavdır, Y., Camcı Çetin, S., Öztürkmen, A. R., & Öztürk, H. S. (2006). Organik Tarımda Toprak Kalitesinin Önemi. In I. H. Eraslan & F. Selli (Eds.), Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantaji Elde Etmede Organik Tarim Sektörü Sektörel Stratejiler Ve Uygulamalar. Uluslararası Rekabet Arastirmalari Kurumu Dernegi (Urak) Yayınlari No: 2006/1, İstanbul, Bölüm 9.Google Scholar
- Kemper, W. D., & Rosenau, R. C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. (Monograph no.9, 2nd edn). Madison: ASA.Google Scholar
- Kesgin, Y., & Varol, B. (2003). Gökçeada ve Bozcaada’nın tersiyer jeolojisi. MTA Dergisi, 126, 49–67.Google Scholar
- Morgan, R. P. C. (2005). Soil Erosion and conservation. The United Kingdom: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Öner, E. (2001). Gökçeada kıyılarında Holosen deniz seviyesi ve kıyı çizgisi değişmeleri. Türkiye’nin Kıyı ve Deniz Alanları. III. Ulusal Konferansı Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara, 779-789 (In Turkish).Google Scholar
- Rhoades, J. D., Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., et al. (1996). Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods (pp. 417–435).Google Scholar
- Richards L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agriculture Handbook No: 60 (pp. 94). Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
- Sarı R., Türkecan, A., Dönmez, M., Küçükefe, Ş., Aydın, Ü., & Özmen, Ö. (2015). The Geology of Gökçeada (Çanakkale). Bulletin Of The Mineral Research and Exploration, (150). https://doi.org/10.19111/bmre.42119.
- Saygın, S. D., Basaran, M., Ozcan, A. U., Dolarslan, M., Timur, O. B., Yilman, F. E., & Erpul, G. (2011). Land degradation assessment by geo-spatially modeling different soil erodibility equations in a semi-arid catchment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 180(1–4), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scanlon, B. R., Stonestrom, D. A., Reedy, R. C., Leaney, F. W., Gates, J., & Cresswell, R. G. (2009). Inventories and mobilization of unsaturated zone sulfate, fluoride, and chloride related to land use change in semiarid regions, southwestern United States and Australia. Water Resources Research, 45(7). W00A18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006963.
- Schlichting, E., & Blume, E. (1966). Bodenkundliches Practikum. Hamburg Und Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey.Google Scholar
- Schoeneberger, P. J. (2002). Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 3.0. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Summer, R. M. (1982). Field and laboratory studies on alpine soil erodibility, southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado. Soil Use and Management, 7(3), 253–266.Google Scholar
- Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook, No. 537. USDA.Google Scholar