Groundwater contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon due to diesel spill from a telecom base station in a Nigerian City: assessment of human health risk exposure
- 55 Downloads
Diesel pollution of groundwater poses great threat to public health, mainly as a result of the constituent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In this study, the human health risk exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in diesel contaminated groundwater used by several families at Ring Road, Jos, Nigeria (as caused by diesel spill from a telecom base station) was assessed. Prior to the groundwater being treated, the residents were using the water after scooping off the visible diesel sheen for purposes of cooking, washing, and bathing. Until this study, it is not clear whether the groundwater contamination had resulted in sub-chronic exposure of the residents using the water to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to the extent of the PAHs posing a health risk. The diesel contaminated groundwater and uncontaminated nearby groundwater (control) were collected and analyzed for PAHs using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The dosage of the dermal and oral ingestion entry routes of PAHs was determined. The estimation of the non-carcinogenic health risk was via hazard quotients (HQ) and the associated hazard index (HI), while the estimation of the carcinogenic health risk was via lifetime cancer risks (LCR) and the associated risk index (RI). Obtained results indicate that the exposure of the residents to the PAHs may have made them susceptible to the risk of non-carcinogenic health effects of benzo(a)pyrene and the carcinogenic health effects of benzo(a)anthracene and benzo(a)pyrene.
KeywordsGroundwater Risk assessment Hydrocarbon Diesel Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
We appreciate all the laboratory attendants at International Energy Services for their assistance during laboratory sample analysis. We also appreciate the residents where the contaminated groundwater was located for their willingness to provide information during this study.
- Bence, A. E., Page, D. S., Boehm, P. D. (2007). Advances in forensic techniques for petroleum hydrocarbons: The Exxon Valdez Experience. In Z. Wang, & S. A. Stout (Eds.), Oil spill environmental forensics (pp 451–453). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Eneye, I.B. (2014). The health, safety and environment challenges of mobile telecommunication infrastructural development in Nigeria. First West African Conference on EMF Exposure and Health.Google Scholar
- Health Canada 2010. Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada. Part V: Guidance On Human Health Detailed Quantitative Risk Assessment For Chemicals (DQRAchem). Available online: www.healthcanada.gc.ca (accessed December 7th, 2016). http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/RAGS_E_EPA540R99005.pdf (accessed on March 30, 2017).
- Liu, F., Liu, Y., Jiang, D. S., Zhang, R. F., Cui, Y. B., & Li, M. (2014). Health risk assessment of semi-volatile organic pollutants in Lhasa River China. Ecotoxicology, 23, 568–573.Google Scholar
- Ragunathan, N., Krock, K. A., Klawun, C. 1999. Review: Gas chromatography with spectroscopic detectors. Journal of Chromatography A, 856, 349-397.Google Scholar
- USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1990. Integrated risk information system. Chemical assessment summary.Google Scholar
- USEPA 1993. Provisional guidance for quantitatiive risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Tech. Rep. EPA/600/R-93/089.Google Scholar
- USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1994. Method 3510C. Separatory funnel liquid-liquid extraction.Google Scholar
- USEPA 1997. Exposure Factors Handbook (1997, Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/P-95/002F a-c.Google Scholar
- USEPA 2001a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). Available online: http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/HHEMA.pdf (accessed on March 31st 2017).
- USEPA 2001b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E). Available online: http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/HHEMA.pdf (accessed on 31st March 2017).
- USEPA 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (PART E: Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment). Available online:https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015/ documents.
- Wang, L. W., Yang, Z. F., Niu, J. F., & Wang, J. Y. (2009). Characterization, ecological risk assessment and source diagnostics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water column of the Yellow River Delta, one of the most plenty biodiversity zones in the world. Journal of Hazardous Materials., 169, 462–463.Google Scholar