Abstract
We investigated the contribution of volatile aerosols in light-absorption measurement by three filter-based optical instruments [aethalometer, continuous light-absorption photometer (CLAP), and continuous soot monitoring system (COSMOS)] at Gosan Climate Observatory (GCO) from February to June 2012. The aerosol absorption coefficient (σ abs) and the equivalent black carbon (BC) mass concentration (M BC) measured by the aethalometer and CLAP showed good agreement with a difference of 9 %, which is likely due to the instrumental uncertainty. However, σ abs and M BC measured by the COSMOS with a heated inlet were found to be approximately 44 and 49 % lower than those measured by the aethalometer and CLAP under ambient conditions, respectively. This difference can be attributed to the light absorption by the volatile aerosols coexisting with the BC. Even considering inherent observational uncertainty, it suggests that approximately 35–40 % difference in the σ abs and M BC can be contributed by volatile aerosols. Increase in the difference of M BC measured by the aethalometer and COSMOS with the increasing thermal organic carbon (OC) measured by Sunset OC/EC analyzer further suggests that the filter-based optical instruments without the use of a heater are likely to enhance the value of σ abs and M BC, because this sample air may contain both BC and volatile aerosols.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreae, M. O., & Gelencser, A. (2006). Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 3131–3148.
Arnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmuller, H., Sheridan, P. J., & Ogren, J. A. (2005). Towards aerosol light-absorption measurements with a 7-wavelength aethalometer: evaluation with a photoacoustic instrument and 3-wavelength nephelometer. Aerosol Science and Technology, 39, 17–29.
Backman, J., Virkkula, A., Petäjä, T., Aurela, M., Frey, A., & Hillamo, R. (2010). Impacts of volatilisation on light scattering and filter-based absorption measurements: a case study. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 3, 1205–1216.
Birch, M. E., & Cary, R. A. (1996). Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Science and Technology, 25, 221–241.
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., & Campbell, D. (1999). Calibration and intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 30, 582–600.
Bond, T. C., et al. (2013). Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 118, 5380–5552. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171.
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., & Petzold, A. (2010). Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 3, 457–474.
Hansen, A., & Schnell, R. (2005). The aethalometer. Berkeley: Magee.
Hansen, A., Rosen, H., & Novakov, T. (1984). The aethalometer—an instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles. Science of the Total Environment, 36, 191–196.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html.
Kondo, Y., Sahu, L., Kuwata, M., Miyazaki, Y., Takegawa, N., Moteki, N., Imaru, J., Han, S., Nakayama, T., Oanh, N. T. K., Hu, M., Kim, Y. J., & Kita, K. (2009). Stabilization of the mass absorption cross section of black carbon for filter-based absorption photometry by the use of a heated inlet. Aerosol Science and Technology, 43, 741–756.
Kondo, Y., Sahu, L., Moteki, N., Khan, F., Takegawa, N., Liu, X., Koike, M., & Miyakawa, T. (2011). Consistency and traceability of black carbon measurements made by laser-induced incandescence, thermal-optical transmittance, and filter-based photo-absorption techniques. Aerosol Science and Technology, 45, 295–312.
Lack, D. A., Cappa, C. D., Covert, D. S., Baynard, T., Massoli, P., Sierau, B., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Lovejoy, E. R., & Ravishankara, A. R. (2008). Bias in filter-based aerosol light absorption measurements due to organic aerosol loading: evidence from ambient measurements. Aerosol Science and Technology, 42, 1033–1041.
Linke, C., Mohler, O., Veres, A., Mohacsi, A., Bozoki, Z., Szabo, G., & Schnaiter, M. (2006). Optical properties and mineralogical composition of different Saharan mineral dust samples: a laboratory study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 3315–3323.
Miyazaki, Y., Kondo, Y., Sahu, L. K., Imaru, J., Fukushima, N., & Kano, M. (2008). Performance of a newly designed continuous soot monitoring system (COSMOS). Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10, 1195–1201.
Moosmüller, H., Chakrabarty, R., & Arnott, W. (2009). Aerosol light absorption and its measurement: a review. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110, 844–878.
Nakayama, T., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Sahu, L. K., Kinase, T., Kita, K., & Matsumi, Y. (2010). Size-dependent correction factors for absorption measurements using filter-based photometers: PSAP and COSMOS. Journal of Aerosol Science, 41, 333–343.
Petzold, A., & Schönlinner, M. (2004). Multi-angle absorption photometry—a new method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black carbon. Journal of Aerosol Science, 35, 421–441.
Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G. (2008). Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1, 221–227.
Schmid, O., Artaxo, P., Arnott, W. P., Chand, D., Gatti, L. V., Frank, G. P., Hoffer, A., Schnaiter, M., & Andreae, M. O. (2006). Spectral light absorption by ambient aerosols influenced by biomass burning in the Amazon Basin. I: comparison and field calibration of absorption measurement techniques. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 3443–3462.
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., & Baltensperger, U. (2003). Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers. Journal of Aerosol Science, 34, 1445–1463.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the BK21 plus program of the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University and by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant CATER 2012-3020. We gratefully acknowledge Prof. M-H Lee (Korea University) and Dr. JA Ogren (NOAA/ESRL/GMD) for providing their data and critical discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Principle of the aethalometer
The principle of the aethalometer is given below as suggested by Hansen and Schnell (2005). The “optical attenuation” ATN is expressed as
where, I o is the intensity of light transmitted through the reference portion of the filter, and I is the intensity of light transmitted through the sample spot.
Attenuation coefficient (σ ATN) is given as:
where A is the filter spot area, V is the volumetric flow rate, and ΔATN is the change in the attenuation during the time interval Δt. Equivalent BC mass concentration (BCATN), micrograms per cubic meter is calculated using the following formula:
where, \( \sigma \mathrm{ATN}=\frac{14625}{\lambda } \) is spectral mass specific attenuation cross-section.
Aethalometer correction
In this study, multiscattering error and filter-loading error that arise in the aethalometer is corrected by using corrected equation as proposed by Schmid et al. (2006),
where, σ abs _ correct is corrected absorption coefficient, Cref is the correction factor for multiple light scattering effects within the filter (Weingartner et al. 2003) and R(ATN) is correction for shadowing effect due to filter loading,
where, f is shadowing factor equal to 1.2.
Corrected mass concentration of BC is then obtained as:
where, σ BC is the mass absorption coefficient equal to 10 m2 g−1 (experimental value) as suggested by Miyazaki et al. (2008).
Appendix 2
Interpolation method
In order to get the aerosol absorption coefficients at the same wavelength, it needs to be interpolated or extrapolated to the matching wavelength with the aid of the Ångström exponent (Backman et al. 2010). If the two parameters are measured at different wavelengths λ1 and λ2, Ångström exponent,
describes the wavelength dependency of scattering or absorption. The Ångström exponent can be used to relate the data to the same wavelength (λ x ) with
This requires the assumption that the spectral dependence of the Ångström exponent is constant. In this study, the light absorption data from the aethalometer were interpolated to the same wavelength as the COSMOS measured the data in.
Appendix 3
Principle of the COSMOS
The absorption coefficient (σ abs) is determined using the following equation (Miyazaki et al. 2008):
where, A (m2) is the area of sample spot, V (m3) is air sample volume during the given time period, and I i and I i + 1 are the average values of the filter transmittances during the prior and current time periods, respectively. Procedure detail can be found in Miyazaki et al. (2008).
COSMOS correction
Aerosol absorption coefficient measured by the COSMOS is corrected using the Bond et al. (1999) correction method. σ abs _ correct i is given by the following equation
where, \( {T}_{ri}=\frac{I_i}{I_0} \) is the filter transmission and K = 1.22 (Bond et al. 1999). Procedure detail is explained in Bond et al. (1999). Mass concentration of BC is then obtained by (6).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shrestha, R., Kim, SW., Yoon, SC. et al. Attribution of aerosol light absorption to black carbon and volatile aerosols. Environ Monit Assess 186, 4743–4751 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3734-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3734-5