The Esca complex in German vineyards: does the training system influence occurrence of GLSD symptoms?
- 74 Downloads
The Esca complex is one of the most destructive grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) worldwide. Several factors, such as plant age, grapevine cultivar, or pattern of precipitation have been identified as possible driving forces of the disease. In the present study, a 4-year monitoring of grapevine leaf stripe disease (GLSD) symptoms in vineyards located in three areas in Rhineland-Palatinate was conducted. Vineyards of different age and planted with different cultivars, both traditional and new ones tolerant against Powdery and Downy Mildew, were chosen. All vineyards were equally subdivided into minimally and intensively pruned sections. The following aspects with regard to the training system were investigated: i) the occurrence of GLSD over the season; ii) the possible influence of cultivar, plant age and precipitation on symptom development; and iii) the possible impact of the training system on the incidence of GLSD. The seasonal patterns of symptom appearance in general were identical for the years 2015, 2016 and 2017. In 2018, however, the maximum peak of newly affected vines was reached about 4 weeks earlier, which is probably linked to the fast phenological development of the vines in this particular year. The training system did not affect the seasonal symptom appearance. All investigated parameters, i.e. cultivar, plant age and precipitation, were shown to have at least some influence on symptoms incidence, even though some of the results were inconsistent over the period of monitoring. Concerning the influence of the training system, in 2015 no differences between minimally pruned (1.8%) and intensively pruned (1.9%) vines were found. However, in the following year minimally pruned vines (6.9%) expressed significantly more symptoms than intensively pruned vines (4.9%). In the years 2017 and 2018 the opposite was the case. 2.6% and 2.4%, respectively, of the minimally pruned vines showed GLSD symptoms, while for the intensively pruned vines the mean values were 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Our study represents the first systematic GLSD related data collection in German vineyards over an extended period of time.
KeywordsEsca Grapevine trunk diseases GLSD Monitoring Training systems Vitis vinifera
The authors would like to thank Projektträger Jülich (PTJ) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for financial support. This work was funded by BMBF in the framework of the project novisys (FKZ 031A349D). Many thanks also go to the DLR Bad Kreuznach, in particular Oswald Walg, for allowing the surveys in their vineyards, as well as Dagmar D’Aguiar for her help during the GLSD monitoring. Dr. Anna Kicherer is thanked for providing the phenological data.
This work was funded by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number FKZ 031A349D).
Compliance with ethical standards
All authors have no conflict of interests to declare. The research did not involve human participants or animals.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Becker, A. (2010). Esca: Der Schnitt macht die Musik. Der Deutsche Weinbau, 1, 14–16.Google Scholar
- Bruez, E., Lecomte, P., Grosman, J., Doublet, B., Bertsch, C., Fontaine, F., Ugaglia, A., Teissedre, P. L., Da Costa, J. P., Guerin-Dubrana, L., & Rey, P. (2013). Overview of grapevine trunk diseases in France in the 2000s. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 52, 262–275.Google Scholar
- Bruez, E., Baumgartner, K., Bastien, S., Travadon, R., Guérin-Dubrana, L., & Rey, P. (2016). Various fungal communities colonise the functional wood tissues of old grapevines externally free from grapevine trunk disease symptoms. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 22, 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clingeleffer P. R. (1984). Production and growth of minimal pruned Sultana vines. Vitis, 23, 42–54.Google Scholar
- Crous, P. W., & Gams, W. (2000). Phaeomoniella chlamydospora gen. et comb. nov., a causal organism of Petri grapevine decline and esca. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 39, 112–118.Google Scholar
- Deepayan, S. (2008). Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2018). FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
- Fischer, M. (2006). Esca der Weinrebe – eine Krankheit auf dem Vormarsch? Deutsches Weinbaujahrbuch, 57, 87–94.Google Scholar
- Fischer, M., & Kassemeyer, H. H. (2003). Fungi associated with esca disease of grapevine in Germany. Vitis, 42, 109–116.Google Scholar
- Fontaine, F., Gramaje, D., Armengol, J., Smart, R., Nagy, Z.A., Borgo, M., Rego, C. & Corio-Costet, M.-F. (2016). Grapevine trunk diseases. A review. OIV Publications, Paris. http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/4650/trunk-diseases-oiv-2016.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
- Guérin-Dubrana, L., Labenne, A., Labrousse, J. C., Bastien, S., Rey, P., & Gégout-Petit, A. (2013). Statistical analysis of grapevine mortality associated with esca or Eutypa dieback foliar expression. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 52, 276–288.Google Scholar
- Intrieri, C., Poni, S., Lia, G., & Del Campo, M. G. (2001). Vine performance and leaf physiology of conventionally and minimally pruned Sangiovese grapevines. Vitis, 40, 123–130.Google Scholar
- Kraus, C., Pennington, T., Herzog, K., Hecht, A., Fischer, M., Voegele, R. T., Hoffmann, C., Töpfer, R., & Kicherer, A. (2018). Effects of canopy architecture and microclimate on grapevine health in two training systems. Vitis, 57, 53–60.Google Scholar
- Kuntzmann, P., Villaume, S., Larignon, P., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Esca, BDA, Eutypiosis: Foliar symptoms, trunk lesions and fungi observed in diseased vinestocks in two vineyards in Alsace. Vitis, 49, 71–76.Google Scholar
- Kuntzmann, P., Barbe, J., Maumy-Bertrand, M., & Bertrand, F. (2013). Late harvest as factor affecting esca and Botryosphaeria dieback prevalence of vineyards in the Alsace region of France. Vitis, 52, 197–204.Google Scholar
- Larignon, P., & Dubos, B. (2000). Preliminary studies on the biology of Phaeoacremonium. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 39, 184–189.Google Scholar
- Lecomte, P., Darrieutort, G., Liminana, J. M., Comont, G., Muruamendiaraz, A., Legorburu, F. J., Choueiri, E., Jreijiri, F., El-Amil, R., & Fermaud, M. (2012). New insights into esca of grapevine: The development of foliar symptoms and their association with xylem discoloration. Plant Disease, 96, 924–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lorenz, D. H., Eichhorn, K. W., Bleiholder, H., Klose, R., Meier, U., & Weber, E. (1995). Growth stages of the grapevine: Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. 45 ssp. vinifera) – Codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH scale. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1, 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marchi, G. (2001). Susceptibility to esca of various grapevine (“Vitis vinifera”) cultivars grafted on different rootstocks in a vineyard in the province of Siena (Italy). Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 40, 27–36.Google Scholar
- Marchi, G., Peduto, F., Mugnai, L., Di Marco, S., Calzarano, F., & Surico, G. (2006). Some observations on the relationship of manifest and hidden esca to rainfall. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 45(Supplement), S117–S126.Google Scholar
- Pertot, I., Caffi, T., Rossi, V., Mugnai, L., Hoffmann, C., Grando, M. S., Gary, C., Lafond, D., Duso, C., Thiery, D., Mazzoni, V., & Anfora, G. (2017). A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Protection, 97, 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quaglia, M., Covarelli, L., & Zazzerini, A. (2009). Epidemiological survey on esca disease in Umbria, Central Italy. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 48, 84–91.Google Scholar
- RStudio Team (2016). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston. URL http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
- Serra, S., Mannoni, M. A., & Ligios, V. (2008). Studies on the susceptibility of pruning wounds to infection by fungi involved in grapevine wood diseases in Italy. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 47, 234–246.Google Scholar
- Surico, G. (2009). Towards a redefinition of the diseases within the esca complex of grapevine. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 48, 5–10.Google Scholar
- Surico, G., Marchi, G., Braccini, P., & Mugnai, L. (2000). Epidemiology of esca in some vineyards in Tuscany (Italy). Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 39, 190–205.Google Scholar
- Surico, G., Mugnai, L., & Marchi, G. (2006). Older and more recent observations on esca: A critical review. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 45, S68–S86.Google Scholar
- Vasquez, S. J., Gubler, W. D., & Leavitt, G. M. (2007). Economic loss in California’s table grape vineyards due to measles. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 46, 118.Google Scholar
- White, C. L., Halleen, F., & Mostert, L. (2011). Symptoms and fungi associated with esca in south African vineyards. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 50(Supplement), S236–S246.Google Scholar