Seedling and adult stage resistance to spot form of net blotch (SFNB) in spring barley and stability of adult stage resistance to SFNB in Morocco
- 78 Downloads
The aims of this study were to identify resistance to spot form of net blotch (SFNB) in spring barley and to investigate the stability of SFNB resistance in Morocco. The seedling resistance to SFNB was evaluated by inoculating 340 barley genotypes with the Pyrenophora teres F. maculata (Ptm) isolate FGOB10Ptm-1 (FGO) in the greenhouse. The same barely genotypes were evaluated for adult-stage plant resistance to SFNB in field trials in Morocco. All experiments were conducted in alpha-lattices with two replicates. SFNB disease severity was estimated on barley leaves using double digit scale. To investigate the stability of both qualitative and quantitative resistance to SFNB, 104 barley genotypes were subjected to AMMI analysis. Differential responses of SFNB barley resistance to FGO were found at the seedling stage in the greenhouse. Twelve genotypes showing scores of <1.5, at the seedling stage, were determined to be highly resistant to FGO. The ANOVA showed highly significant (p < 0.001) effects of genotype (G) and G × E (E-Pathotypes of SFNB) interaction on SFNB severity among the 340 barley genotypes at the adult plant stage. The AMMI ANOVA showed that IPCA1, IPCA2 and IPCA3 accounted for 77.9% of the variation of the G × E interaction for SFNB severity. The G × E interaction consisted of divergent genotypic responses to SFNB severity due to different pathotypes prevalent in hot-spot environments. The AMMI stability value demonstrated that barley genotypes AM-14, 30, 31, 68, 107, 108, 112, 149, 170, 185, 204, 240, 304, 326, 326 and 337 were resistant and stable across hot-spot environments against SFNB. Divergent environmental responses of SFNB were recorded in MCH_2015, SE_2015, AT_2016, SE_2016 and JS_2015. Stable SFNB resistant genotypes are valuable resources for the introgression of qualitative and quantitative resistance to barley in Morocco.
KeywordsAMMI Barley Net blotch Ptm Resistance SFNB
The authors are thankful to the research technicians of ICARDA and INRA-Maroc in all of the test locations. The funding for this research was provided jointly by ICARDA and CRP-Dryland Cereals. Authors are thankful to Mr. Alex Marcus Batson from Washington State University, NWREC, Mt. Vernon for his critical review and English editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
All authors of this manuscript are aware of the content of the article and have agreed upon it submission to European Journal of Plant Pathology.
The manuscript has not been published in whole or part elsewhere.
The manuscript is not currently being considered for publication in another journal.
The manuscript is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests
- Amezrou, R., Gyawali, S., Belqadi, L., Chao, S., Arbaoui, M., Mamidi, S., Rehman, S., Sreedasyam, A., & Verma, R. P. S. (2017) Molecular and phenotypic diversity of ICARDA spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) collection. Genetic Resour Crop Evol 65:255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0527-z
- Amezrou, R. (2018) Genome-wide association studies of multiple traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). PhD dissertation. Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II. Rabat, MoroccoGoogle Scholar
- Bentata, F., Labhilili, M., EI Aissami, A., Bary, S., Yeslem, C. H., & Ibijbijen, J. (2011). Analysis of diversity genetic of Moroccan net blotch populations using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(39), 7548–7554. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1340.Google Scholar
- Cherif, M., Rezgui, S., Devaux, P., & Harrabi, M. (2010). Genotype × environment interactions and heritability of quantitative resistance to net blotch in Tunisian barley. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 2(5), 110–116.Google Scholar
- Cromey, M. G., & Parkes, R. A. (2003). Pathogenic variation in Drechslera teres in New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection, 56, 251–256.Google Scholar
- DeLacy, I. H., Basford, K. E., Cooper, M., & Fox, P. N. (1996a). Retrospective analysis of historical data sets from multi-environment trials- theoretical development. In M. Cooper & G. L. Hammer (Eds.), Plant adaptation and crop improvement (pp. 243–267). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
- DeLacy, I. H., Ratnasiri, W. G. A., & Mirzawan, P. D. N. (1996b). Retrospective analysis of historical data sets from multi-environment trials-case studies. In M. Cooper & G. L. Hammer (Eds.), Plant adaptation and crop improvement (pp. 269–290). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
- Eyal Z, Scharen AL, Prescott JM, Van Ginkel M (1987) The Septoria diseases of wheat: Concepts 483 and methods of disease management. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
- Farshadfar, E., Mahmodi, N., & Yaghotipoor, A. (2011). AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(13), 1837–1844.Google Scholar
- Forbes, G. A., Chacón, M. G., Kirk, H. G., Huarte, M. A., Van Damme, M., Distel, S., Mackay, G. R., Stewart, H. E., Lowe, R., Duncan, J. M., Mayton, H. S., Fry, W. E., Andrivon, D., Ellissèche, D., Pellé, R., Platt, H. W., Mackenzie, G., Tarn, T. R., Colon, L. T., Budding, D. J., Lozoya-Saldaña, H., Hernandez-Vilchis, A., & Capezio, S. (2005). Stability of resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato: An international evaluation. Plant Pathology, 54(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01187.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinzer KMD (2015) Characterizing P. teres F. maculata in the northern United States and impact of spot form net blotch on yield of barley. PhD Dissertation. North Dakota State University, ND, USA.Google Scholar
- Mathre, D. E. (1982). Compendium of barley diseases. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. St. In Paul. USA: Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Neupane, A., Tamang, P., Brueggeman, R. S., & Friesen, T. L. (2015). Evaluation of barley core collection for spot form of net blotch reaction reveals distinct genotype-specific pathogen virulence and host susceptibility. Phytopathology, 105, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-14-0107-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qamar, A., Liu, Z.H.M., Faris, J.D., Chao, S., Edwards, M.C., Lai, Z., Franckowiak, J.D., Friesen, & T.L. (2008). A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117, 1261–1270.Google Scholar
- Rao, P. S., Reddy, P. S., Rathore, A., Reddy, B. V., & Panwar, S. (2011). Application GGE biplot and AMMI model to evaluate sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) hybrids for genotype x environment interaction and seasonal adaptation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 81, 438–444.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J., & Jalli, M. (1999). Sensitivity of resistance to net blotch in barley. Journal of Phytopathology, 147(4), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.1999.147004235.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saari, E. E., & Prescott, J. M. (1975). A scale for appraising the foliar severity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease Reporter, 59, 377–380.Google Scholar
- Shipton, W. A., Khan, T. N., & Boyd, W. J. R. (1973). Net blotch of barley. Review of Plant Pathology, 52, 269–290.Google Scholar
- Taibi, K., Bentata, G., Rehman, S., Labhilili, M., El Aissami, A., Verma, R. P. S., & Gyawali, S. (2016) Virulence of Moroccan Pyrenophora teres f. teres revealed by international differential barley genotypes. 44(2):263–271Google Scholar
- Tuohy, J. M., Jalli, M., Cooke, B. M., & O’Sullivan, E. (2006). Pathogenic variation in populations of Drechslera teres f. teres and D. teres f. maculata and differences in host cultivar responses. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 116, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9001-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar