Assessing synergism of combined applications of Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens to control blast and bacterial leaf blight of rice
- 73 Downloads
Combined application of biocontrol agents (BCAs) have been used to exploit their synergistic potential. But the analysis of additive, synergistic and antagonistic effects of BCAs has rarely been explored for the biocontrol of plant diseases. This study was conducted to evaluate in vitro and in vivo biocontrol potential of the combined application of Trichoderma harzianum strain Th3 and Pseudomonas fluorescens strain RRb11, and the fungicide carbendazim against the rice blast (RB) pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, and the bacterial leaf blight (BLB) pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Combined application of T. harzianum Th3 and P. fluorescens RRb11 synergistically reduced severity of RB by 69.5% in comparison to the untreated control, displaying a synergy factor (SF) of 1.29. P. fluorescens RRb 11 alone and in combination with T. harzianum Th3 and the mixture of T. harzianum Th3 + carbendazim was antagonistic (SF = 0.71 and 0.45, respectively). The combined application of T. harzianum Th3 and P. fluorescens RRb 11 also enhanced several rice plant growth and yield parameters. Additive, synergistic or antagonistic effects among the two BCAs were assessed by applying the numerical hypothesis of ‘Bliss Independence’ which suggested that the combined application of the two BCAs was synergistic in reducing RB but antagonistic with respect to BLB. Out of the six combined application interactions for both the diseases only one interaction (T. harzianum Th3 and P. fluorescens RRb11) was synergistic against RB, which suggested that synergism is a rare event in combined use of BCAs.
KeywordsTrichoderma harzianum Pseudomonas fluorescens Biocontrol Synergism Blast Blight
The authors are grateful to the Zonal Director of Research, Agricultural Research Station, Banswara, for providing necessary facilities for the experiments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Involvement of human participants and /or animals
The present research did not involve or practiced on any human or animals.
Authors are ready to provide sufficient detailed information of the present study to the readers for future collaboration and participation in such kind of research with us.
- Alabouvette, C., Lemanceau, P., & Steinberg, C. (1996). Biological control of fusarium wilds: Opportunities for developing a commercial product. In R. Hall (Ed.), Principles and practice of managing soilborne plant pathogens (pp. 192–212). St Paul: APS Press.Google Scholar
- Alizadeh, H., Behboudi, K., Ahmadzadeh, M., Javan-Nikkhah, M., Zamioudis, C., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. M. (2013). Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana by the combination of Trichoderma harzianum Tr6 and Pseudomonas sp. Ps14. Biological Control, 65, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Becquer, C. J., Lazarovits, G., & Lalin, I. (2013). In vitro ineractions between Trichoderma harzianum and plant growth promoter rhizosphere bacteria. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 47(1), 97–103.Google Scholar
- Contreras Cornejo, H. A., Ortiz Castro, R., & Lopez Bucio, J. (2013). Promotion of plant growth and the induction of systemic defence by Trichoderma: Physiology, genetics and gene expression. In P. K. Mukherjee (Ed.), Trichoderma biology and applications (pp. 175–196). London: CABI.Google Scholar
- Howell, C. R. (1998). The role of antibiosis in biocontrol. In G. E., Harman & C. P. Kubicek (Eds.), Trichoderma and Gliocladium Vol 2, (pp. 173–184). London: Taylor and Francies.Google Scholar
- IRRI. (1996). Standard evaluation system (SES) scale for leaf blast. In Plant Pathology Technical Program. ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research. pp. 5.Google Scholar
- John, R. P., Tyagi, R. D., Prévost, D., Brar, S. K., Pouleur, S., & Surampalli, R. Y. (2010). Mycoparasitic Trichoderma viride as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. adzuki and Pythium arrhenomanes and as a growth promoter of soybean. Crop Protection, 29, 1452–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larkin, R. P., Roberts, D. P., & Gracia-Garza, J. A. (1998). In Hutson, D., Miyamoto, J. (Eds.), Fungicidal activity – Chemical and biological approaches to plant protection, (pp. 141–191). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McKinney, H. N. (1923). Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helmenthosporium sativum. Journal of Agricultural Research, 26, 195–207.Google Scholar
- Meena, C. B., & Gopalakrishnan, J. (2013). Integrated management of bacterial blight of rice using rhizobacteria and botanicals. Environmental Ecology, 31(3), 1390–1395.Google Scholar
- Neumann, B., & Laing, M. (2006). Trichoderma: An ally in the quest for soil system sustainability. In N. Uphoff, E. Fernandes, H. Herren, O. Husson, M. Laing, C. Palm, J. Pretty, P. Sanchez, N. Sanginga, & J. Thies (Eds.), Biological approaches to sustainable soil system (pp. 491–500). FL: Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pandya, R., Tripathi, R. S., & Kaushik, S. K. (2011). Upland rice in Rajasthan. In R. K. Singh, C. V. Singh, N. P. Mandal, & M. S. Anantha (Eds.), Upland rice in India (pp. 301–320). New Delhi: Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
- Prakash, O M. (2013). Study on population dynamics and effect of pesticides on Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum used as antagonists against bacterial leaf blight of rice in IPM system. Ph.D. Thesis IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Raman, J. (2012). Response of Azotobacter, Pseudomonas and Trichoderma on growth of apple seedling. International Conference on Biological and Life Sciences IPCBEE, IACSIT Press, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Roberts, D. P., Lohrke, S. M., Meyer, S. L. F., Buyer, J. S., Bowers, J. H., Baker, C. J., Li, W., de Souza, J. T., Lewis, J. A., & Chung, S. (2005). Biocontrol agents applied individually and in combination for suppression of soil borne diseases of cucumber. Crop Protection, 24, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saju, K. A., Anandaraj, M., & Sarma, Y. R. (2003). Evaluation of Trichoderma sp. and Pseudomonas sp. for suppression of Phytophthora capsici infecting black pepper. In M. S. Reddy, M. Anandaraj, S. J. Eapen, Y. R. Sarma, & J. W. Kloepper (Eds.), Sixth international workshop on plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria, abstracts and short papers, 5–10 October 2003 (pp. 52–58). Calicut: Indian Institute of Spices Research, Calicut.Google Scholar
- Sandheep, A. R., Asok, A. K., & Jisha, M. S. (2013). Combined inoculation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma harzianum for enhancing plant growth of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia). Pakistan Journal Biological Science, 16(2), 580–584.Google Scholar
- Sharma, S. K., & Dohroo, N. P. (1991). Post harvest management of rhizome rot (Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. zingiber, Trujillo) of ginger through chemical and antagonists. Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices Journal, 14(4), 150–152.Google Scholar
- Sharma, P., & Dureja, P. (2004). Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride isolates at BCA pathogen crop Interface. Journal of Mycology & Plant Pathology, 34(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
- Singh, S. P., & Singh, H. B. (2012). Effect of consortium of Trichoderma harzianum isolates on growth attributes and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum rot of brinjal. Vegetable Science, 39(2), 144–148.Google Scholar
- Zegeye, E. D., Santhanam, A., Gorfu, D., Tessera, M., & Kassa, B. (2011). Biocontrol activity of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens against Phytophthora infestans under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Agriculture Technology, 7(6), 1589–1602.Google Scholar