Detecting potato viruses using direct reverse transcription quantitative PCR (DiRT-qPCR) without RNA purification: an alternative to DAS-ELISA
Virus screening is obligatory to avoid the spread of plant viruses regionally and globally. Double-antibody sandwich (DAS)-ELISA is the standard for screening potato viruses owing to its high-throughput potential, robustness, and cost–benefit ratio. However, low virus titers present in dormant potato tubers may not be reliably detected by using DAS-ELISA. Virus enrichment for reliable virus detection by DAS-ELISA assay is time-consuming and can be avoided by switching to more sensitive molecular biological techniques. Therefore, we developed a TaqMan® qPCR-based one-step protocol, termed direct reverse transcription quantitative PCR (DiRT-qPCR) for detection of RNA potato viruses PVY, PLRV and PVS without sophisticated nucleic acid purification and providing a high-throughput potential. Compared with DAS-ELISA, DiRT-qPCR showed up to a 100,000,000-fold higher sensitivity depending on the virus species. We also compared the qualitative results of standard DAS-ELISA used in seed potato certification, performed by sampling leaves of at least 4-weeks-old cultivated tuber eye cuttings, to the 1.5 h long DiRT-qPCR protocol on dormant tubers. The DiRT-qPCR protocol achieved an agreement with the DAS-ELISA procedure of 92.8%, 84.1% and 82.3% for the detection of PLRV, PVY, and PVS, respectively. The investigated different virus species show different multiplication behavior in secondary infected potato tuber eye cuttings, which is assumed to be a reason for the remaining qualitative differences in the outcome of the DiRT-qPCR and DAS-ELISA comparison. In our opinion, DiRT-qPCR protocol can be used as a reliable, work- and resource-saving alternative to DAS-ELISA in qualitative directed virus detection, particularly because no RNA purification is needed and dormant potato tubers can be directly used.
KeywordsPotato leaf roll virus (PLRV) Potato virus Y (PVY) Potato virus S (PVS) TaqMan® real-time PCR assay Simple sample preparation Direct reverse transcription quantitative PCR (DiRT-qPCR) Conventional reverse transcription quantitative PCR (CoRT-qPCR)
We thank Dr. Petr Dedic, who worked at the Potato Research Institute Havlíčkův Brod (Czech Republic) for providing virus infected in vitro potato plant material for assay validation and assay sensitivity comparison, Johannes Hertrich for technical assistance and the technical assistance team of the Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (Freising, Germany) for conducting the DAS-ELISA assay. In addition, we want to thank Thomas Eckl (Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, Germany) for support in statistical calculation and Dr. Miriam Prinz (Bavarian State Research Center, Freising, Germany) for article proof reading.
We also thank the former head of the Associate Professorship of Fruit Science Prof. Dr. Dieter Treutter who passed away and the current temporary head Prof. Dr. Wilfried Schwab for their support.
- Ahouee, K. H., Habibi, M. K., & Mosahebi, G. H. (2010). Detection of potato leafroll virus isolated from potato fields in Tehran province in aphids by immunocapture reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(16), 2349–2352.Google Scholar
- Casper, R. (1988). Luteoviruses. In: The Plant Viruses: Polyhedral virions with monopartite RNA genomes., R. Koenig, ed (Boston, MA: Springer US), pp. 235–258, ISBN:978-1-4612-8246-4.Google Scholar
- Chung, B. Y.-W., Miller, W. A., Atkins, J. F., & Firth, A. E. (2008). An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(15), 5897–5902. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800468105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Faccioli, G., Panopoulos, N. J., & Gold, A. H. (1971). Kinetics of the carbohydrate metabolism in potato leafroll-infected Physalis floridana Rydb. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 10(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
- Gallup, J. M. (2011). qPCR inhibition and amplification of difficult templates. In S. Kennedy & N. Oswald (Eds.), PCR troubleshooting and optimization: The essential guide. Caister Academic Press 9781904455721.Google Scholar
- Gundry, C.N., & Poulson, M.D. (2011). Obtaining maximum PCR sensitivity and specifity. In: S. Kennedy, N. Oswald (Eds.) PCR troubleshooting and optimization: The essential guide.Caister Academic Press. ISBN:9781904455721.Google Scholar
- Hameed, A., Iqbal, Z., Asad, S., & Mansoor, S. (2014). Detection of multiple potato viruses in the field suggests synergistic interactions among potato viruses in Pakistan. The Plant Pathology Journal, 30(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.05.2014.0039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kogovsek, P., Pompe-Novak, M., Petek, M., Fragner, L., Weckwerth, W., & Gruden, K. (2016). Primary metabolism, phenylpropanoids and antioxidant pathways are regulated in potato as a response to potato virus Y infection. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Leone, G., van Schijndel, H. B., van Genien, B., & Schoen, C. D. (1997). Direct detection of potato leafroll virus in potato tubers by immunocapture and the isothermal nucleic acid amplification method NASBA. Journal of Virological Methods, 66(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(97)02203-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malnoe, P., Farinelli, L., Collet, G. F., & Reust, W. (1994). Small-scale field tests with transgenic potato, cv. Bintje, to test resistance to primary and secondary infections with potato virus Y. Plant Molecular Biology, 25(6), 963–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martelli, G. P., Adams, M. J., Kreuze, J. F., & Dolja, V. V. (2007). Family Flexiviridae: A case study in virion and genome plasticity. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 45, 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortimer-Jones, S. M., Jones, M. G., Jones, R. A., Thomson, G., & Dwyer, G. I. (2009). A single tube, quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay that detects four potato viruses simultaneously. Journal of Virological Methods, 161(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.06.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nyalugwe, E. P., Wilson, C. R., Coutts, B. A., & Jones, R. A. C. (2012). Biological properties of potato virus X in potato: Effects of mixed infection with potato virus S and resistance phenotypes in cultivars from three continents. Plant Disease, 96(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Olspert, A., Carr, J. P., & Firth, A. E. (2016). Mutational analysis of the potyviridae transcriptional slippage site utilized for expression of the P3N-PIPO and P1N-PISPO proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(16), 7618–7629. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw441.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Petrie, A., & Sabin, C. (2009). Medical statistics at a glance. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 140518051X.Google Scholar
- PflKartV (1986). Pflanzkartoffelverordnung in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 23. November 2004 (BGBl. I S. 2918), die zuletzt durch Artikel 4 der Verordnung vom 9. Juni 2017 (BGBl. I S. 1614) geändert worden ist. Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection.Google Scholar
- Reiter, M., & Pfaffl, M. W. (2011). RT-PCR optimization strategies. In S. Kennedy & N. Oswald (Eds.), PCR troubleshooting and optimization: The essential guide. Caister Academic Press 9781904455721.Google Scholar
- Schori, M., Appel, M., Kitko, A., & Showalter, A. M. (2013). Engineered DNA polymerase improves PCR results for plastid DNA. Applications in Plant Sciences, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200519.
- Singh, M., Singh, R. P., Fageria, M. S., Nie, X., Coffin, R., & Hawkins, G. (2013). Optimization of a real-time RT-PCR assay and its comparison with ELISA, conventional RT-PCR and the grow-out test for large scale diagnosis of potato virus Y in dormant potato tubers. American Journal of Potato Research, 90(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-012-9274-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stammler, J., Hadersdorfer, J., Neumüller, M., Kellermann, A., & Treutter, D. (2014). Poster: Ansatz zur Optimierung des molekularen Nachweises von Kartoffelviren (approach for optimization of molecular detection of potato viruses). Julius-Kühn-Archiv (447).Google Scholar
- Stare, T., Ramšak, Ž., Blejec, A., Stare, K., Turnšek, N., Weckwerth, W., Wienkoop, S., Vodnik, D., & Gruden, K. (2015). Bimodal dynamics of primary metabolism-related responses in tolerant potato-potato virus Y interaction. BMC Genomics, 16, 716. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1925-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Struik, P. C., & Wiersema, S. G. (1999). Seed potato technology. Wageningen Pers: Wageningen. isbn:9074134653.Google Scholar
- Wei, T., Lu, G., & Clover, G. (2008). Novel approaches to mitigate primer interaction and eliminate inhibitors in multiplex PCR, demonstrated using an assay for detection of three strawberry viruses. Journal of Virological Methods, 151(1), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.03.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weller, S. A., Elphinstone, J. G., Smith, N. C., Boonham, N., & Stead, D. E. (2000). Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(7), 2853–2858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar