Nutritional epidemiology: forest, trees and leaves

  • Edward GiovannucciEmail author


Ioannidis has stated that the field of nutritional epidemiology has generated confusion and numerous implausible findings and is in need of radical reform. One of the reforms he proposes is to conduct analyses that take into account the "totality for all nutritional factors measured". This approach is based on isolating and reducing diet into numerous independent variables with little regard to prior knowledge or the interrelations among dietary components, and relying on a "discovery" approach. This method, akin to genomewide association studies (GWAS), would involve very large sample sizes, small associations, no prior knowledge, and multiple testing considerations. This method is contrary to the more traditional hypothesis generating and testing approach built on all types of evidence. This commentary will contrast how suitable these two approaches are to study diet and disease.


Nutrition Epidemiology Cardiovascular diseases Diet 



  1. 1.
    Trepanowski JF, Ioannidis JPA. Perspective: limiting dependence on nonrandomized studies and improving randomized trials in human nutrition research: why and how. Adv Nutr. 2018;9(4):367–77.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ioannidis JP. Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ. 2013;347:f6698.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ioannidis JPA. The challenge of reforming nutritional epidemiologic research. JAMA. 2018;320(10):969–70.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satija A, et al. Perspective: are large, simple trials the solution for nutrition research? Adv Nutr. 2018;9(4):378–87.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patel CJ, et al. Systematic evaluation of environmental and behavioural factors associated with all-cause mortality in the United States national health and nutrition examination survey. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1795–810.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eaton SB, Konner M. Paleolithic nutrition. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:283–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konner M, Eaton SB. Paleolithic nutrition: twenty-five years later. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(6):594–602.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Willett WC. Dietary fats and coronary heart disease. J Intern Med. 2012;272(1):13–24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1345–422.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Satija A, et al. Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(1):5–18.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuan C, et al. Relative validity of nutrient intakes assessed by questionnaire, 24-hour recalls, and diet records as compared with urinary recovery and plasma concentration biomarkers: findings for women. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(5):1051–63.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwingshackl L, et al. Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(6):1462–73.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filippini T, et al. The effect of potassium supplementation on blood pressure in hypertensive subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:127–35.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gay HC, et al. Effects of different dietary interventions on blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension. 2016;67(4):733–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Binia A, et al. Daily potassium intake and sodium-to-potassium ratio in the reduction of blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens. 2015;33(8):1509–20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perez V, Chang ET. Sodium-to-potassium ratio and blood pressure, hypertension, and related factors. Adv Nutr. 2014;5(6):712–41.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Appel LJ. The effects of dietary factors on blood pressure. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35(2):197–212.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aune D, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):1029–56.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aune D, et al. Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i2716.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sacks FM, et al. Dietary fats and cardiovascular disease: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(3):e1–23.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hooper L, et al. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6). p. CD011737.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Estruch R, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):e34.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aune D, et al. Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):207.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jakobsen MU, et al. Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1425–32.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Estruch R, et al. Retraction and republication: primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2441–2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Howard BV, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial. JAMA. 2006;295(6):655–66.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    de Lorgeril M, et al. Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1994;343(8911):1454–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giovannucci E. A framework to understand diet, physical activity, body weight, and cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fogelholm M, et al. Dietary macronutrients and food consumption as determinants of long-term weight change in adult populations: a systematic literature review. Food Nutr Res. 2012;56:19103.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swinburn BA, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–14.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rodgers A, et al. Prevalence trends tell us what did not precipitate the US obesity epidemic. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(4):e162–3.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scarborough P, et al. Increased energy intake entirely accounts for increase in body weight in women but not in men in the UK between 1986 and 2000. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(9):1399–404.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Young LR, Nestle M. Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(2):231–4.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(4):537–43.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giovannucci E. An integrative approach for deciphering the causal associations of physical activity and cancer risk: the role of adiposity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(9):935–41.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tabung FK, et al. Development and validation of an empirical dietary inflammatory index. J Nutr. 2016;146(8):1560–70.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tabung FK, et al. Development and validation of empirical indices to assess the insulinaemic potential of diet and lifestyle. Br J Nutr. 2016;8:1–12.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tabung FK, et al. Association of dietary inflammatory potential with colorectal cancer risk in men and women. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):366–73.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tabung FK, et al. Association of dietary insulinemic potential and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(2):363–70.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toivonen KI, et al. Folic acid supplementation during the preconception period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2018;114:1–17.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    He K, et al. Folate, vitamin B6, and B12 intakes in relation to risk of stroke among men. Stroke. 2004;35(1):169–74.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bazzano LA, et al. Dietary intake of folate and risk of stroke in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1183–8.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hankey GJ. B vitamins for stroke prevention. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018;3(2):51–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang Q, et al. Improvement in stroke mortality in Canada and the United States, 1990 to 2002. Circulation. 2006;113(10):1335–43.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Keum N, et al. Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(8):1940–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Martineau AR, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2017;356:i6583.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolsk HM, et al. Prenatal vitamin D supplementation reduces risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze in early childhood: a combined analysis of two randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186657.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Machisio P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of acute otitis media in otitis-prone children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(10):1055–60.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keum N, Giovannucci E. Vitamin D supplements and cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(5):976–80.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Manson JE, et al. Vitamin D supplements and prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33–44.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mokry LE, et al. Vitamin D and risk of multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(8):e1001866.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Munger KL, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2832–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations