Advertisement

Association between physical activity and sub-types of cardiovascular disease death causes in a general population cohort

  • Mark Hamer
  • Gary O’Donovan
  • Emmanuel Stamatakis
Open Access
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Abstract

Physical activity is thought to be cardioprotective, but associations with different subtypes of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are poorly understood. We examined associations between physical activity and seven major CVD death causes. The sample comprised 65,093 adults (aged 58 ± 12 years, 45.4% men) followed up over mean [SD] 9.4 ± 4.5 years, recruited from The Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Surveys. A CVD diagnosis was reported in 9.2% of the sample at baseline. Physical activity was self-reported. Outcomes were subtypes of CVD death; acute myocardial infarction; chronic ischaemic heart disease; pulmonary heart disease; a composite of cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death; heart failure; cerebrovascular; composite of aortic aneurysm and other peripheral vascular diseases. There were 3050 CVD deaths (30.8% of all deaths). In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders, physical activity was associated with reduced relative risk of all CVD outcomes; compared with the lowest, the highest physical activity quintile was associated with reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction (Hazard ratio 0.66: 95% CI 0.50, 0.89), chronic ischaemic heart disease (0.49: 0.38, 0.64), pulmonary heart disease (0.48: 0.22, 1.07), arrhythmias (0.18: 0.04, 0.76); heart failure (0.35: 0.20, 0.63), cerebrovascular events (0.53: 0.38, 0.75); aneurysm and peripheral vascular diseases (0.54: 0.34, 0.93). Results were largely consistent across participants with and without existing CVD at baseline. Physical activity was associated with reduced risk of seven major CVD death causes. Protective benefits were apparent even at levels of activity below the current recommendations.

Keywords

Physical activity Cardiovascular diseases Mortality 

Introduction

There is considerable evidence on associations between physical activity (PA) and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death [1, 2, 3], although the majority of these cohort studies have treated CVD as a composite endpoint and failed to consider the different sub-types. In larger samples it is common practise to investigate coronary heart disease [2] and stroke [3] as separate entities. However, less common CVD disorders (e.g., heart failure, cardiac arrest, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and peripheral arterial disease) have been rarely examined, particularly from within the same cohort. A direct comparison of effect estimates across sub-types of CVD may provide etiological insights about likely mechanisms of PA action on cardiovascular physiology. In addition evidence on PA and specific CVD outcomes is needed to develop more specific guidelines on prevention of subtypes of CVD.

Our objective was to examine the association between PA and seven major sub-types of CVD death in a large general population sample of adults living in the United Kingdom.

Methods

Participants were recruited from 11 survey years of the Health Survey for England and the Scottish Health Survey; [4, 5] these included 1994 (HSE only), 1995 (SHS only), 1997 (HSE only), 1998 (HSE and SHS), 1999 (HSE only), 2003 (HSE and SHS), 2004, 2006, 2008 (HSE only).Local research ethics committees approved each survey and all participants gave written informed consent. PA in the 4 weeks prior to interview was assessed by a validated questionnaire [6]. PA was categorised into four groups: Inactive (participants not undertaking any PA of moderate or vigorous intensity); Insufficient activity (undertaking some moderate—vigorous PA but not meeting the current PA guidelines); Sufficient activity (those meeting and exceeding the guidelines 150 min/week moderate or 75 min/week vigorous PA); High activity (those exceeding 300 min/week moderate –vigorous PA) [1]. In addition we categorised total PA into quintiles based on metabolic equivalents (METs) per week, where one MET is considered to represent resting energy expenditure.

Individual participant data were linked with the British National Health Service Central Registry to record mortality. Audits have shown that these data are ~ 90% accurate in identifying the correct diagnosis, and completeness of data is ~ 99% [5]. Based on prior studies [7] we chose seven major CVD outcomes: acute myocardial infarction (ICD-10 code; I21); chronic ischaemic heart disease (I25); pulmonary heart disease (I26-28); a composite of cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death (I46-49); heart failure (I50); cerebrovascular death (I60-I69); and a composite of aortic aneurysm and other peripheral vascular diseases (I71-73). Data for survivors were censored to 12/31/2009 (Scottish survey) or 3/31/2011 (English survey). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations of PA with CVD mortality. Based on prior work [1, 2, 3] models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking (never, previous, current), social occupational group (professional/managerial, skilled non-manual/manual, semi-skilled/non-skilled), presence or absence of chronic illnesses, psychological health (using the 12 item General Health Questionnaire). In sensitivity analyses we re-ran the models (on outcomes with sufficient numbers of events) after stratifying the sample into participants with (n = 5962) and without (n = 59,131) a physician diagnosis of CVD at baseline in order to explore possible reverse causation. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Inc.).

Results

The sample comprised 65,093 adults aged 40 years and above (aged 58 ± 12 years, 45.4% men). Physically active participants were younger, more likely to be male, never-smokers, from a higher social occupational group, report less illnesses (including prevalent CVD), and lower psychological distress (Table 1). There were 9900 deaths in total, 3050 of which were attributed to CVD (30.8% of all deaths) during 564,959 person-years of follow-up. Nearly half (48.5%) of all CVD was attributed to coronary heart disease (acute myocardial infarction and chronic ischaemic heart disease), with stroke (20.8%), heart failure (8.5%), aortic aneurysm and other peripheral vascular diseases (7.7%) pulmonary heart disease (2.8%), cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death (2.3%), and other causes (9.4%; too few events to separately analyse) making up the remainder.
Table 1

Characteristics of the sample at baseline

 

Inactive (n = 40,413)

Insufficient activity (n = 13,121)

Sufficient activity (n = 6826)

High activity (n = 4751)

Age, years ± SD

60.6 ± 12.6

54.2 ± 10.6

52.5 ± 9.8

53.4 ± 10.3

Sex, % male

45.2

44.5

48.6

54.6

Cigarette smoking, %

 Never

41.4

49.3

53.4

51.0

 Ex-smoker

32.9

31.7

31.6

33.0

 Current

25.7

19.0

15.0

16.0

Occupation, %

 Professional/managerial

27.5

41.4

47.3

47.2

 Skilled

44.6

40.9

36.7

36.1

 Semi/unskilled

27.9

17.9

16.0

16.7

Chronic illness, %

60.2

45.4

40.3

38.7

Prevalent CVD, %

12.1

4.5

3.3

3.7

Psychological distress, %

 Asymptomatic

57.8

64.6

68.8

72.6

 Sub clinical

24.9

22.9

20.9

19.1

 Symptomatic

8.3

6.5

5.6

4.4

 High

9.0

5.9

4.7

3.9

Prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) defined as physician diagnosed angina, heart attack, stroke. Psychological distress divided into four groups based on scores from GHQ-12: asymptomatic (score = 0), sub clinically symptomatic (1–3), symptomatic (4–6), and highly symptomatic (7–12)

Sufficient activity was associated with reduced risk of all CVD outcomes (Fig. 1a; Table e1 in ESM), albeit confidence intervals did not reach conventional levels of significance in outcomes with limited events (heart failure; pulmonary heart disease; cardiac arrest/arrhythmias/sudden cardiac death). Reduction in risk ranged from 17% (pulmonary) to 58% (aortic aneurysm/peripheral vascular diseases) and point estimates were remarkably consistent across coronary heart diseases, heart failure and cerebrovascular deaths, albeit, confidence intervals were wide and overlapping for some of the less common outcomes. Among participants meeting PA guidelines, around 41% exceeded them (300+ mins/week). In general, participants that exceeded the guidelines did not demonstrate noticeably greater risk reduction (compared to those meeting basic guidelines) (Fig. 1a). We did not find any evidence of interactions by sex.
Fig. 1

Associations between physical activity and different CVD death endpoints in participants aged 40 years and above in Health Survey for England/Scottish Health Survey (n = 65,093). a Categorises participants based on the physical activity guidelines; b Categorised total physical activity into quintiles based on metabolic equivalents (MET) hours per week. Hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age, sex, smoking, social occupational group, chronic illnesses, psychological distress

We explored the shape of the association in more detail using total PA as a continuous variable (MET-h-week) split into quintiles (Fig. 1b). There was some evidence of dose–response relationships albeit, confidence intervals were wide and overlapping for some of the less common outcomes.

A CVD diagnosis was reported in 9.2% of the sample at baseline. Results were largely consistent across participants with and without existing CVD at baseline (Table e2 in ESM), except there was no association between PA and aortic aneurysm/other peripheral vascular diseases in participants with existing CVD.

Discussion

The majority of large epidemiological studies have focused on associations between PA and a composite CVD endpoint or coronary heart disease [2]. Our objective was to examine the association between PA and different sub-types of CVD death. Physical activity was associated with reduced risk of all types of CVD outcomes that we examined. The associations appeared stronger when our exposure was based on total PA (not just restricted to moderate—vigorous intensity PA) suggesting that all types of PA may contribute to CVD prevention.

Consistent with our findings, an association was observed between PA and heart failure in a recent meta-analysis of 12 prospective studies [8]. There has been limited work on PA and prevention of peripheral vascular diseases, particularly in general population cohorts, although existing data from patient samples are consistent with our findings [9]. Findings on PA and arrhythmias has been mixed; recent studies have shown associations between PA and physical fitness with reduced risk of atrial fibrillation [10, 11] although others have suggested a non-linear pattern of results [12, 13]. Our data showed an inverse association between PA and risk of stroke although we were unable to further sub-type cerebrovascular events. Recent data have suggested curvilinear associations for PA and haemorrhage stroke, indicating protection at moderate PA levels and possible increased risk at very high levels of activity; in contrast very high levels of PA was not associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke in Asian populations [3, 14], although results may differ in Western cohorts [15]. Our findings on coronary heart disease suggested a plateau in risk reduction at higher levels of PA. Nevertheless, recent work [11] comparing associations of self-reported and objective PA on CVD risk observed curvilinear and linear curves, respectively, suggesting that reporting bias might possibility explain increased risk in participants that mis-report very high PA levels.

We were not able to directly explore mechanisms in these analyses. It is plausible that biomedical risk factors such as body mass index, blood pressure and cholesterol are on the intermediate pathway linking PA and CVD [16], thus we did not adjust for these factors in our models. The mechanisms accounting for the associations between PA and different CVD outcomes may differ, although this remains poorly understood. A key strength was the ability to sub-type major CVD deaths in sufficient numbers over an extended follow-up, together with our validated exposure measure. Limitations include the possibility of residual confounding as we lacked complete data on other lifestyle variables (sedentary behaviour, diet) and more detailed socioeconomic factors. Reverse causation is also a concern in analyses of PA and disease outcomes although the results remained unchanged when existing cases of CVD at baseline were removed. We were unable to obtain linkages for participants that emigrated through follow-up, thus they would have been excluded from the analytic sample. This reflects a very small proportion of the cohort and is unlikely to have influenced our results. However, 10.2% of the cohort did not consent to linkage. Participants not consenting to linkage were slightly older (60 vs. 58 years, p < 0.001), more likely to come from manual occupations (27.9 vs. 23.8%), and be physically inactive in leisure time (67.0 vs. 61.8%), although there were no differences in prevalence of CVD at baseline (8.9 vs. 9.0%) compared to the analytic sample. Thus, our analytic sample displayed a more favourable profile that may not have been truly representative of the general population. Given that only ~ 3.4% of the sample undertook regular strength training, our PA variable combined aerobic activity and strength exercises. Aerobic exercise, however, was more strongly associated with protection from CVD than strength training in previous work from this cohort study [17]. Given the lack of events for some outcomes it was challenging to undertake detailed investigation on the shape of the association.

In summary, physical activity was associated with reduced risk of seven major CVD death causes. All types of PA may contribute to CVD prevention, and protective benefits were apparent even at levels of activity below the current recommendations.

Notes

Authors Contribution

Hamer obtained funding, conceptualized and designed the study, performed analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. He is the manuscript’s guarantor; Stamatakis conceptualized and designed the study, provided statistical input and critical revision of the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; O’Donovan conceptualized and designed the study, provided critical revision of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. We affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Funding

Stamatakis is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through a Senior Research Fellowship. Hamer is funded through the NIHR Leicester BRC.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.

Supplementary material

10654_2018_460_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    O’Donovan G, Lee IM, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Association of “Weekend Warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW 3rd, Haskell W, Lee IM. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;124(7):789–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett DA, Du H, Clarke R, Guo Y, Yang L, Bian Z, Chen Y, Millwood I, Yu C, He P, Zheng X, Collins R, Chen J, Peto R, Li L, Chen Z, China Kadoorie Biobank Study Collaborative Group. Association of physical activity with risk of major cardiovascular diseases in Chinese men and women. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(12):1349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mindell J, Biddulph JP, Hirani V, Stamatakis E, Craig R, Nunn S, Shelton N. Cohort profile: the health survey for England. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1585–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray L, Batty GD, Craig P, Stewart C, Whyte B, Finlayson A, Leyland AH. Cohort profile: the Scottish health surveys cohort: linkage of study participants to routinely collected records for mortality, hospital discharge, cancer and offspring birth characteristics in three nationwide studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2):345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scholes S, Coombs N, Pedisic Z, et al. Age- and sex-specific criterion validity of the health survey for England Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Assessment Questionnaire as compared with accelerometry. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(12):1493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    George J, Mathur R, Shah AD, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Denaxas S, Smeeth L, Timmis A, Hemingway H. Ethnicity and the first diagnosis of a wide range of cardiovascular diseases: associations in a linked electronic health record cohort of 1 million patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandey A, Garg S, Khunger M, Darden D, Ayers C, Kumbhani DJ, Mayo HG, de Lemos JA, Berry JD. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and risk of heart failure: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2015;132(19):1786–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stein RA, Rockman CB, Guo Y, Adelman MA, Riles T, Hiatt WR, Berger JS. Association between physical activity and peripheral artery disease and carotid artery stenosis in a self-referred population of 3 million adults. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(1):206–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qureshi WT, Alirhayim Z, Blaha MJ, Juraschek SP, Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Al-Mallah MH. Cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: results from the henry Ford Exercise Testing (FIT) Project. Circulation. 2015;131(21):1827–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tikkanen E, Gustafsson S, Ingelsson E. Associations of fitness, physical activity, strength, and genetic risk with cardiovascular disease: longitudinal analyses in the UK Biobank Study. Circulation. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan H, Kella D, Rauramaa R, Savonen K, Lloyd MS, Laukkanen JA. Cardiorespiratory fitness and atrial fibrillation: a population-based follow-up study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1424–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mozaffarian D, Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Siscovick D. Physical activity and incidence of atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2008;118(8):800–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kubota Y, Iso H, Yamagishi K, Sawada N, Tsugane S, JPHC Study Group. Daily total physical activity and incident stroke: the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study. Stroke. 2017;48(7):1730–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Feskens EJ, Boshuizen HC, Verschuren WM, Saris WH, Kromhout D. Physical activity and stroke. A meta-analysis of observational data. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(4):787–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mora S, Cook N, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Lee IM. Physical activity and reduced risk of cardiovascular events: potential mediating mechanisms. Circulation. 2007;116(19):2110–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stamatakis E, Lee IM, Bennie J, Freeston J, Hamer M, O’Donovan G, Ding D, Bauman A, Mavros Y. Does strength-promoting exercise confer unique health benefits? A pooled analysis of data on 11 population cohorts with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality endpoints. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(5):1102–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sport, Exercise and Health SciencesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
  4. 4.Charles Perkins Centre Epidemiology UnitUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations