Advertisement

Influence of hydraulic gradient and temperature on the migration of E. coli in saturated porous media during bank filtration: a case study at the Second Songhua River, Songyuan, Northeastern China

  • Wanli Ren
  • Xiaosi SuEmail author
  • Xue Zhang
  • Yaoxuan Chen
  • Yakun Shi
Original Research
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

River bank filtration can effectively reduce the number of pathogenic microorganisms infiltrating into groundwater from surface water. Groundwater seepage velocity and temperature are considered to be important factors affecting the process, but the magnitude and mechanism of their impacts have not been clear for a long time. Based on the actual monitoring data of the Escherichia coli concentrations and soil samples of Second Songhua riverside source area, the migration of E. coli in saturated porous media under different velocities and different temperatures was studied using saturated soil column transport experiments. Concurrently, the migration characteristics of E. coli in the riverside source area were replicated by mathematical simulation. According to the field monitoring results, the concentration of E. coli decreased in the riverbank infiltration zone, and the removal rate was greater than 96%. The column experimental results showed that the lower the flow velocity was and the higher the temperature was, the greater the removal rate of E. coli was. And the flow velocity was the main factor affecting the removal of E. Coli. The mathematical simulation results showed that under the conditions of the largest hydraulic gradient (20%) and the highest concentration of E. coli (2500 MPN/100 mL) in river water, the safe exploitation distance of groundwater that did not cause a risk of E. coli pollution was more than 7 m away from the river bank. These findings are expected to provide a scientific basis for the design of water intake schemes and the optimization of mining technology.

Keywords

Escherichia coli migration Temperature Hydraulic gradient River water infiltration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41877178 and 41372238). We are also grateful to Dr. Yaoxuan Chen, Ms. Xue Zhang and Ms. Yakun Shi for their help during the field investigation. We also thank Mr. Yumeng Yan for his support in the laboratory soil column experiment.

References

  1. Ashbolt, N. J. (2004). Microbial contamination of drinking water and disease outcomes in developing regions. Toxicology,198(1–3), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, H., Cochet, N., Pauss, A., & Lamy, E. (2016). Bacteria cell properties and grain size impact on bacteria transport and deposition in porous media. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces,139, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford, S. A., Simunek, J., Bettahar, M., Tadassa, Y. F., Van Genuchten, M. T., & Yates, S. R. (2005). Straining of colloids at textural interfaces. Water Resources Research,41(10), W10404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, G., & Walker, S. L. (2012). Fecal indicator bacteria transport and deposition in saturated and unsaturated porous media. Environmental Science and Technology,46(16), 8782–8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chrysikopoulos, C. V., & Aravantinou, A. F. (2014). Virus attachment onto quartz sand: Role of grain size and temperature. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2(2), 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EPA. (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington, DC: Water Environment Federation.Google Scholar
  7. Foppen, J. W., Mporokoso, A., & Schijven, J. F. (2005). Determining straining of Escherichia coli from breakthrough curves. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,76(3), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frind, E. O., Molson, J., & Rudolph, D. L. (2006). Well vulnerability: A quantitative approach for source water protection. Ground Water,44(5), 732–742.Google Scholar
  9. Gallardomoreno, A. M., Gonzalezmartin, M. L., Bruque, J. M., Perezgiraldo, C., Sanchezsilos, R., & Gomezgarcia, A. C. (2003). Influence of the growth medium, suspending liquid and measurement temperature on the physico-chemical surface properties of two enterococci strains. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology,17(14), 1877–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gharabaghi, B., Safadoust, A., Mahboubi, A. A., Mosaddeghi, M. R., Unc, A., Ahrens, B., et al. (2015). Temperature effect on the transport of bromide and E. coli NAR in saturated soils. Journal of Hydrology,522, 418–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grischek, T., Schoenheinz, D., & Ray, C. (2002). Siting and design issues for riverbank filtration schemes. In C. Ray, G. Melin, & R. B. Linsky (Eds.), Riverbank filtration (Vol. 43). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, V., Johnson, W. P., Shafieian, P., Ryu, H., Alum, A., Abbaszadegan, M., et al. (2009). Riverbank filtration: Comparison of pilot scale transport with theory. Environmental Science and Technology,43(3), 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, B., Teng, Y., Zhai, Y., Zuo, R., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2016). Riverbank filtration in China: A review and perspective. Journal of Hydrology,541, 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaynes, D. B. (1990). Temperature variations effect on field-measured infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal,54(2), 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang, D., Huang, Q., Cai, P., Rong, X., & Chen, W. (2007). Adsorption of Pseudomonas putida on clay minerals and iron oxide. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces,54(2), 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. John, D. E., & Rose, J. B. (2005). Review of factors affecting microbial survival in groundwater. Environmental Science and Technology,39(19), 7345–7356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, H., & Walker, S. L. (2009). Escherichia coli transport in porous media: Influence of cell strain, solution chemistry, and temperature. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces,71(1), 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuehn, W., & Mueller, U. (2000). Riverbank filtration: An overview. Journal American Water Works Association,92(12), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lentz, R. D., & Bjorneberg, D. L. (1999). Influence of irrigation water properties on furrow infiltration: Temperature effects. In Proceedings of 10th international soil conservation organization meeting, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  20. Łuczkiewicz, A., & Quant, B. (2007). Soil and groundwater fecal contamination as a result of sewage sludge land application. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies16(4), 587–593.Google Scholar
  21. Lutterodt, G., Foppen, J. W., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2012). Transport of Escherichia coli strains isolated from natural spring water. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,140, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massmann, G., Dunnbier, U., Heberer, T., & Taute, T. (2008). Behaviour and redox sensitivity of pharmaceutical residues during bank filtration—Investigation of residues of phenazone-type analgesics. Chemosphere,71(8), 1476–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ray, C., Grischek, T., Schubert, J., Wang, J. Z., & Speth, T. F. (2002). A perspective of riverbank filtration. Journal American Water Works Association,94(4), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Regli, C., Rauber, M., & Huggenberger, P. (2003). Analysis of aquifer heterogeneity within a well capture zone, comparison of model data with field experiments: A case study from the river Wiese. Switzerland. Aquatic Sciences,65(2), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sasidharan, S., Torkzaban, S., Bradford, S. A., Cook, P. G., & Gupta, V. V. (2017). Temperature dependency of virus and nanoparticle transport and retention in saturated porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,196, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schubert, J. (2002). Hydraulic aspects of riverbank filtration—field studies. Journal of Hydrology,266(3), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharma, L., Greskowiak, J., Ray, C., Eckert, P., & Prommer, H. (2012). Elucidating temperature effects on seasonal variations of biogeochemical turnover rates during riverbank filtration. Journal of Hydrology,428, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva, A. K., Kavanagh, O., Estes, M. K., & Elimelech, M. (2011). Adsorption and aggregation properties of norovirus GI and GII virus-like particles demonstrate differing responses to solution chemistry. Environmental Science and Technology,45(2), 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevik, T. K., Aa, K., Ausland, G., & Hanssen, J. F. (2004). Retention and removal of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater percolating through porous media: a review. Water Research,38(6), 1355–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Teng, Y., Hu, B., Zheng, J., Wang, J., Zhai, Y., & Zhu, C. (2018). Water quality responses to the interaction between surface water and groundwater along the Songhua River, NE China. Hydrogeology Journal,26(5), 1591–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thakur, A. K., Ojha, C. S., Singh, V. P., Gurjar, B. R., & Sandhu, C. (2013). Removal of pathogens by river bank filtration at haridwar, India. Hydrological Processes,27(11), 1535–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tufenkji, N., Ryan, J. N., & Elimelech, M. (2002). Peer reviewed: The promise of bank filtration. Environmental Science and Technology,36(21), 422A–428A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verstraeten, I. M., Thurman, E. M., Lindsey, M. E., Lee, E. C., & Smith, R. D. (2002). Changes in concentrations of triazine and acetamide herbicides by bank filtration, ozonation, and chlorination in a public water supply. Journal of Hydrology,266(3), 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, H. T. (2008). Dynamics of fluid flow and contaminant transport in porous media. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, L., Ye, X., & Du, X. (2016). Suitability evaluation of river bank filtration along the Second Songhua river, China. Water,8(5), 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiss, W. J., Bouwer, E. J., Aboytes, R., Lechevallier, M. W., Melia, C. R., Le, B. T., et al. (2005). Riverbank filtration for control of microorganisms: Results from field monitoring. Water Research,39(10), 1990–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. WHO. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO Chronicle38(4), 104–108.Google Scholar
  38. Zhong, H., Liu, G., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Yang, X., et al. (2017). Transport of bacteria in porous media and its enhancement by surfactants for bioaugmentation: A review. Biotechnology Advances,35(4), 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu, Y., Zhai, Y., Du, Q., Teng, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, G. (2019). The impact of well drawdowns on the mixing process of river water and groundwater and water quality in a riverside well field, Northeast China. Hydrological Processes,33(6), 945–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanli Ren
    • 1
    • 5
  • Xiaosi Su
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xue Zhang
    • 3
  • Yaoxuan Chen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Yakun Shi
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.College of Construction EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Institute of Water Resources and EnvironmentJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  3. 3.China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.BeijingChina
  4. 4.College of New Energy and EnvironmentJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  5. 5.Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of EducationJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations