Advertisement

Carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2) exchange fluxes between cotton fields and the atmosphere in the arid area in Xinjiang, China

  • Weiwen JingEmail author
  • Liling Wang
  • Deqiang Li
  • Xiaowei Bao
  • Yingshuang Shi
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the important roles of carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CS2) in atmospheric chemistry, this study was designed to determine different proportions of COS and CS2 fluxes contributed from different sources, i.e., vegetation, soil and roots, at monthly and hourly timescales in the arid area in Xinjiang, China. Results indicated that the seasonal net uptake of COS by vegetation was predominant in the growing season. The CS2 fluxes from vegetation and soils had no significant seasonal variations compared with COS. The exchange rates of COS and CS2 have been found to be stimulated by the addition of nutrients in the form of urea fertilizer. Compared with the results of plots that were treated only with nitrogen, the treatments with both nitrogen and sulfur displayed no significant difference in the exchange fluxes. The results of compartment experiments indicated that the aboveground plants had the highest uptake of COS and had a vital role in the uptake of COS during the main growth period. The shares of COS emissions from the soil and roots increased to 6–17% and 55–58%, respectively, in the total COS fluxes when conditions, such as drought and senescence, were unfavorable for the developmental of vegetation. Observations of the preliminary diurnal fluxes indicated that the fluxes that occurred at night, with contributions from soils and plants, accounted for 27% of the total daily uptake of COS uptake. These quantitative results may be reasonably accounted for the use of COS as a promising tracer to obtain independent constraints on terrestrial carbon exchange at regional to global scales for their response to special environmental conditions in semiarid area.

Keywords

Carbonyl sulfide (COS) Carbon disulfide (CS2Cotton field Flux Arid area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41263004).

References

  1. Andreae, M. O., & Crutzen, P. J. (1997). Atmospheric aerosols—Biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry. Science, 276, 1052–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaf, D., Rotenberg, E., Tatarinov, F., Dicken, U., Montzka, S. A., & Yakir, D. (2013). Ecosystem photosynthesis inferred frommeasurements of carbonyl sulphide flux. Nature Geoscience, 6, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkly, M. P., Palmer, P. I., Boone, C. D., Bernath, P. F., & Suntharalingam, P. (2008). Global distributions of carbonyl sulfide in the upper troposphere and stratosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 137–149.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, J., Wolf, A., Campbell, J. E., Baker, I., & Blake, N. (2013). A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: A possible new window on the carbon cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118, 842–852.Google Scholar
  5. Billesbach, D. P., Berry, J. A., Seibt, U., Maseyk, K., Torn, M. S., Fischer, M. L., et al. (2014). Growing season eddy covariance measurements of carbonyl sulfide and CO2 fluxes: COS and CO2 relationships in Southern Great Plains winter wheat. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 184, 8–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloem, E., Haneklaus, S., Kesselmeier, J., & Schnug, E. (2012). Sulfur fertilization and fungal infections affect the exchange of H2S and COS from agricultural crops. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 7588–7596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunk, R., Behrendt, T., Yi, Z. G., Andreae, M. O., & Kesselmeier, J. (2017). Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) between soils and atmosphere under various CO2 concentrations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 122, 1343–1358.Google Scholar
  8. Bunk, R., Yi, Z. G., Behrendt, T., Wu, D. M., Andreae, M. O., & Kesselmeier, J. (2018). Carbonyl sulfide exchange between soils and the atmosphere affected by soil moisture and compensation points. Biogeosciences Discussions.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-20.Google Scholar
  9. Commane, R., Meredith, L. K., Baker, I. T., Berry, J. A., Munger, J. W., Montzka, S. A., et al. (2015). Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 14162–14167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad, R., & Meuser, K. (2000). Soil contain more than one activity consuming carbonyl sulfide. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 3635–3639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crutzen, P. J. (1976). The possible importance of COS for the sulphate layer of the stratosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 3, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Mello, W. Z., & Hines, M. E. (1994). Application of static and dynamic enclosures for determining dimethyl sulfide and carbonyl sulfide exchange in Sphagnum peatlands: Implications for the magnitude and direction of flux. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 14601–14607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diest, H. Van, & Kesselmeier, H. J. (2008). Soil atmosphere exchange of carbonyl sulfide (COS) regulated by diffusivity depending on water-filled pore space. Biogeosciences, 5, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng, Z., & Hartel, P. G. (1996). Factors affecting production of COS and CS2 in Leucaena and Mimosa species. Plant and Soil, 178, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han, H. Y., Wang, F. Y., Chen, B., & Li, B. C. (2014). Study on cotton leaf area index and transmittance application of different planting density. China Cotton (China), 41, 14–15.Google Scholar
  16. Hartel, P. G., & Haines, B. L. (1992). Effects of potential plant CS2 emissions on bacterial growth in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 24, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huebert, B. J., Blomquist, B. W., Hare, J. E., Fairall, C. W., Johnson, J. E., & Bates, T. S. (2004). Measurement of the sea-air DMS flux and transfer velocity using eddy correlation. Geophysical Research Letters, 312, 345–357.Google Scholar
  18. Jing, W. W., Li, N., Li, X. F., Li, D. Q., & Wang, L. L. (2018). Exchange fluxes of VOSCs between rice paddy fields and the atmosphere in the oasis of arid area in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 75, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, B. M. R. A., & Penkett, S. A. (1983). Atmospheric chemistry of carbon disulfide. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 1, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kesselmeier, J., Teusch, N., & Kuhn, U. (1999). Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soil. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 11577–11584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kettle, A. J., Kuhn, U., Hobe, M. Von, Kesselmeier, J., & Andreae, M. O. (2002). Global budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Temporal and spatial variations of the dominant sources and sinks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 4658–4674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitz, F., Gerdel, K., Hammerle, A., Laterza, T., Spielmann, F. M., & Wohlfahrt, G. (2017). In situ soil COS exchange of a temperate mountain grassland under simulated drought. Oecologia, 183, 851–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kooijmans, L. M. J., Maseyk, K., Seibt, U., Sun, W., Vesala, T., Mammarella, I., et al. (2017). Canopy uptake dominates nighttime carbonyl sulfide fluxes in a boreal forest. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, C. J., Wang, Y. X., & Zhang, B. (2018). Proportional fertilization: Effects on quality and yield of Alfalfa. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 34, 146–152 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  25. Malhi, S. S., & Nyborg, M. (1982). An evaluation of carbon disulphide as a sulphur fertilizer and as a nitrification inhibitor. Plant and Soil, 65, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maseyk, K., Berry, J. A., Billesbach, D., Campbell, J. E., Torn, M. S., Zahniser, M., et al. (2014). Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 9064–9069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Melillo, J. M., & Steudler, P. A. (1989). The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the COS and CS2 emissions from temperature forest soils. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 9, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meredith, L. K., Boye, K., Youngerman, C., Whelan, M., Ogée, J., Sauze, J., et al. (2018). Coupled biological and abiotic mechanisms driving carbonyl sulfide production in soils. Soil Systems, 2, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montzka, S. A., Aydin, M., Battle, M., Butler, J. H., Saltzman, E. S., Hall, B. D., et al. (2004). A 350-year atmospheric history for carbonyl sulfide inferred from Antarctic firn air and air trapped in ice. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D22302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Protoschill-Krebs, G., Wilhelm, C., & Kesselmeier, J. (1996). Consumption of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by higher plant carbonic anhydrase (CA). Atmospheric Environment, 30, 3135–3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rastogi, B., Berkelhammer, M., Wharton, S., Whelan, M. E., Meinzer, F. C., Noone, D., et al. (2018). Ecosystem fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in an old-growth forest: Temporal dynamics and responses to diffuse radiation and heat waves. Biogeosciences Discussions, 15, 7127–7139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simmons, J. S., Klemedtsson, L., Hultberg, H., & Hines, M. E. (1999). Consumption of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by coniferous boreal forest soils. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 11569–11576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. (2017). Xinjiang statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  34. Su, X. S., Cui, G., Wang, H., Dai, Z. X., Woo, Nam-Chil, & Yuan, W. Z. (2018). Biogeochemical zonation of sulfur during the discharge of groundwater to lake in desert plateau (Dakebo Lake, NW China). Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 40, 1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun, W., Kooijmans, L. M. J., Maseyk, K., Chen, H., Mammarella, I., Vesala, T., et al. (2018). Soil fluxes of carbonyl sulfide (COS), carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a boreal forest in southern Finland. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun, W., Maseyk, K., Lett, C., & Seibt, U. (2016). Litter dominates surface fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a Californian oak woodland. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121, 438–450.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, T. J., Hu, Z. Y., Xie, M., Zhang, Y., Xu, C. K., & Chao, Z. H. (2004). Atmospheric sulfur deposition onto different ecosystems over China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 26, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wehr, R., Commane, R., Munger, J. W., Mcmanus, J. B., Nelson, D. D., Zahniser, M. S., et al. (2017). Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake. Biogeosciences, 14, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whelan, M. E., Hilton, T. W., Berry, J. A., Berkelhammer, M., Desai, A. R., & Campbell, J. E. (2016). Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16, 21095–21132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whelan, M. E., Lennartz, S. T., Gimeno, T. E., Wehr, R., Wohlfahrt, G., Wang, Y. T., et al. (2017). Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences Discussions, 15, 3625–3657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whelan, M. E., Min, D.-H., & Rhew, R. C. (2013). Salt marsh vegetation as a carbonyl sulfide (COS) source to the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 73, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whelan, M. E., & Rhew, R. C. (2015). Carbonyl sulfide produced by abiotic thermal and photodegradation of soil organic matter from wheat field substrate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 120, 54–62.Google Scholar
  43. Whelan, M. E., & Rhew, R. C. (2016). Reduced sulfur trace gas exchange between a seasonally dry grassland and the atmosphere. Biogeochemistry, 128, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu, X., Bingemer, H. G., & Schmidt, U. (2002). The flux of carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide between the atmosphere and a spruce forest. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang, F. L., Qubaja, R., Tatarinov, F., Rotenberg, E., & Yakir, D. (2018). Assessing canopy performance using carbonyl sulfide (COS) measurements. Global Change Biology, 24, 3486–3498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yi, Z. G., Zheng, L. L., Wu, T., & Wang, X. M. (2013). Contribution of aboveground plants, the rhizosphere and root-free-soils to total COS and DMS fluxes at three key growth stages in rice paddies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 179, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Chemistry Laboratory, College of Chemical EngineeringXinjiang Agricultural UniversityÜrümqiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Food and Pharmaceutical SciencesXinjiang Agricultural UniversityÜrümqiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations