Advertisement

Climate-change information, health-risk perception and residents’ environmental complaint behavior: an empirical study in China

  • Shanyong Wang
  • Jingjing Jiang
  • Yu ZhouEmail author
  • Jun Li
  • Dingtao Zhao
  • Shoufu Lin
Original Paper
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Motivating residents to deliver environmental complaints is beneficial for environmental authorities to help them manage environmental issues and alleviate the adverse effects caused by climate change. The major aim of the present study is to understand how climate-change information and residents’ health-risk perceptions (both physical and mental dimensions) affect residents’ environmental complaint behavior. The research framework was developed according to planned behavior theory, risk perception behavior and information behavior models. This framework was empirically assessed by employing questionnaire survey data gathered from 1273 respondents in China. The results indicate that climate-change information and residents’ health-risk perceptions have all significantly positive effects on residents’ attitudes toward environmental complaints and their intention to submit environmental complaints. Meanwhile, residents’ health-risk perception is also positively affected by climate-change information. Mental health-risk perception plays a much stronger role in determining a residents’ attitude and intention to submit an environmental complaint than does physical health-risk perception. Furthermore, attitude toward environmental complaint, perceived behavioral control and subjective norm all have significantly positive effects on a residents’ intention to submit an environmental complaint. Additionally, this study also addresses the intention–behavior gap and suggests a positive relationship between intention and behavior. The present study may provide some practical implications to motivate residents to submit environmental complaints.

Keywords

Climate-change information Health-risk perception Environmental complaint Theory of planned behavior Information behavior model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 71804174, 71601174 and 71571172), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Number 2018M632555), National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 16CJL020), Fujian Fund of Soft Science Research (Grant Number 2017R0034) and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ban, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). The health policy implications of individual adaptive behavior responses to smog pollution in urban China. Environment International, 106, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2014). Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheung, L. T., Chow, A. S., Fok, L., et al. (2017). The effect of self-determined motivation on household energy consumption behavior in a metropolitan area in southern China. Energy Efficiency, 10(3), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson, I. G. (2018). Assessing the effects of information about global population growth on risk perceptions and support for mitigation and prevention strategies. Risk Analysis, 38(10), 2222–22421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong, Y., Hu, S., & Zhu, J. (2018). From source credibility to risk perception: How and when climate information matters to action. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 410–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong, Y., Ishikawa, M., Liu, X., et al. (2011). The determinants of citizen complaints on environmental pollution: An empirical study from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(12), 1306–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drazkiewicz, A., Challies, E., & Newig, J. (2015). Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. Land Use Policy, 46, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elias, E., Schrader, T. S., Abatzoglou, J. T., et al. (2018). County-level climate change information to support decision-making on working lands. Climatic Change, 148(3), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan, J., Wang, S., Wu, Y., et al. (2015). Buffer effect and price effect of a personal carbon trading scheme. Energy, 82, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao, L., Wang, S., Li, J., et al. (2017). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghahremanzadeh, H., Noori, R., Baghvand, A., et al. (2018). Evaluating the main sources of groundwater pollution in the southern Tehran aquifer using principal component factor analysis. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 40(4), 1317–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heidari, A., Kolahi, M., Behravesh, N., et al. (2018). Youth and sustainable waste management: A SEM approach and extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 1–13.Google Scholar
  19. Ihedioha, J. N., Ukoha, P. O., & Ekere, N. R. (2017). Ecological and human health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in soil of a municipal solid waste dump in Uyo,Nigeria. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 39(3), 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kantamaturapoj, K., Piyajun, G., & Wibulpolprasert, S. (2018). Stakeholder’s opinion of public participation in Thai environmental and health impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 1–13.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, F. J., & Fussell, J. C. (2015). Air pollution and public health: Emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 37(4), 631–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kwok, T. F., Yeung, C. H., & Xu, Y. (2017). Swaying public opinion on nuclear energy: A field experiment in Hong Kong. Utilities Policy, 46, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., & Ramprasad, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change, 2(11), 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Libarkin, J. C., Gold, A. U., Harris, S. E., et al. (2018). A new, valid measure of climate change understanding: Associations with risk perception. Climatic Change, 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. Lin, S., Wang, S., Marinova, D., et al. (2017). Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: Empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 952–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, L., & de Jong, M. (2017). The institutional causes of environmental protests in China: A perspective from common pool resource management. Journal of Chinese Governance, 2(4), 460–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, X., Dong, Y., Wang, C., et al. (2011). Citizen complaints about environmental pollution: A survey study in Suzhou, China. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 40(3), 193–219.Google Scholar
  29. Lu, H., Yue, A., Chen, H., et al. (2018). Could smog pollution lead to the migration of local skilled workers? Evidence from the Jing-Jin-Ji region in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 130, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ng, E., & Ren, C. (2018). China’s adaptation to climate and urban climatic changes: A critical review. Urban Climate, 23, 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 35, 43–78.Google Scholar
  32. Shi, H., Wang, S., & Zhao, D. (2017). Exploring urban resident’s vehicular PM2. 5 reduction behavior intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 603–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verma, V. K., & Chandra, B. (2018). An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers’ green hotel visit intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1152–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., et al. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, S., Lin, S., & Li, J. (2018a). Exploring the effects of non-cognitive and emotional factors on household electricity saving behavior. Energy Policy, 115, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, S., Wang, J., Ru, X., et al. (2018b). Public smog knowledge, risk perception, and intention to reduce car use: Evidence from China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1–15.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, J., Wang, S., Wang, Y., et al. (2018b). Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand consumers’ intentions to visit green hotels in the Chinese context. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(8), 2810–2825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, L., Zhang, W., Tao, W., et al. (2017). Investigating into composition, distribution, sources and health risk of phthalic acid esters in street dust of Xi’an City, Northwest China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 39(4), 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu, S., Lu, T., Qian, X., et al. (2018). Behavioral intention analysis of waste separation in China-case study of Hangzhou using theory of planned behavior. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng, J. J., & Hu, J. X. (2015). Factors contributing to environmental public participation in China: An empirical analysis of provincial panel data (2003–2012). China Population, Resource and Environment, 25(12), 62–69.Google Scholar
  41. Zhang, X. (2010). Economic development, governmental regulation and public participation: An analytical framework of environmental impact and empirical analysis. China Population, Resource and Environment, 20, 204–209.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, X. J. (2017). Influencing mechanism on environmental quality by public participation. Urban Problems, 4, 10–13.Google Scholar
  43. Zhang, X., Geng, G., & Sun, P. (2017). Determinants and implications of citizens’ environmental complaint in China: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, X., Liu, J., & Zhao, K. (2018). Antecedents of citizens’ environmental complaint intention in China: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao, H., Qu, F., Zhu, D., et al. (2008). Mechanism and policy on reducing and controlling environment pollution (periodical style). Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 17(4), 628–633.Google Scholar
  46. Zhou, Y., Song, Y., & Tian, J. (2016). Risk perception of air pollution: An exploration of self-relevancy. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(7), 1506–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shanyong Wang
    • 1
  • Jingjing Jiang
    • 2
  • Yu Zhou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jun Li
    • 1
  • Dingtao Zhao
    • 1
  • Shoufu Lin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementHarbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)ShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of EconomicsFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations