Advertisement

Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 2511–2524 | Cite as

Indoor particle dynamics in a school office: determination of particle concentrations, deposition rates and penetration factors under naturally ventilated conditions

  • X. C. Cong
  • J. J. Zhao
  • Z. Jing
  • Q. G. Wang
  • P. F. Ni
Original Paper
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Recently, the problem of indoor particulate matter pollution has received much attention. An increasing number of epidemiological studies show that the concentration of atmospheric particulate matter has a significant effect on human health, even at very low concentrations. Most of these investigations have relied upon outdoor particle concentrations as surrogates of human exposures. However, considering that the concentration distribution of the indoor particulate matter is largely dependent on the extent to which these particles penetrate the building and on the degree of suspension in the indoor air, human exposures to particles of outdoor origin may not be equal to outdoor particle concentration levels. Therefore, it is critical to understand the relationship between the particle concentrations found outdoors and those found in indoor micro-environments. In this study, experiments were conducted using a naturally ventilated office located in Qingdao, China. The indoor and outdoor particle concentrations were measured at the same time using an optical counter with four size ranges. The particle size distribution ranged from 0.3 to 2.5 μm, and the experimental period was from April to September, 2016. Based on the experimental data, the dynamic and mass balance model based on time was used to estimate the penetration rate and deposition rate at air exchange rates of 0.03–0.25 h−1. The values of the penetration rate and deposition velocity of indoor particles were determined to range from 0.45 to 0.82 h−1 and 1.71 to 2.82 m/h, respectively. In addition, the particulate pollution exposure in the indoor environment was analyzed to estimate the exposure hazard from indoor particulate matter pollution, which is important for human exposure to particles and associated health effects. The conclusions from this study can serve to provide a better understanding the dynamics and behaviors of airborne particle entering into buildings. And they will also highlight effective methods to reduce exposure to particles in office buildings.

Keywords

Dynamic mass balance model I/O ratios Air exchange rate Penetration factor Deposition rates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of P. R. China (ZR2016DM06).

References

  1. Abhishek, G., & Cheong, K. W. D. (2007). Physical characterization of particulate matter and ambient meteorological parameters at different indoor–outdoor locations in Singapore. Building and Environment, 42(1), 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abt, E., Suh, H. H., Allen, G., & Koutrakis, P. (2000). Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, R., Wallace, L., Larson, T., Sheppard, L., & Liu, L. J. S. (2007). Evaluation of the recursive model approach for estimating particulate matter infiltration efficiencies using continuous light scattering data. Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 17(5), 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, D. H., & Koutrakis, P. (2006). Determining the infiltration of outdoor particles in the indoor environment using a dynamic model. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37(6), 766–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, M. A., Goddard, A. J. H., Lange, C., & Roed, J. (1995). Stable tracer aerosol deposition measurements in a test chamber. Aerosol Science, 26, 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaloulakou, A., & Mavroidis, I. (2002). Comparison of indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO at a public school: Evaluation of an indoor air quality model. Atmospheric Environment, 36(11), 1769–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao, C. Y. H., Wan, M. P., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2003). Penetration coefficient and deposition rate as a function of particle size in non-smoking naturally ventilated residences. Atmospheric Environment, 37(30), 4233–4241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, C., Zhao, B., Zhou, W., Jiang, X. Y., & Tan, Z. C. (2012). A methodology for predicting particle penetration factor through cracks of windows and doors for actual engineering application. Building and Environment, 47(1), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogh, C. L., Byrne, M. A., Roed, J., & Goddard, A. J. H. (1997). Size specific indoor aerosol deposition measurements and derived I/O concentrations ratios. Atmospheric Environment, 31, 2193–2203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franck, U., Herbarth, O., Wehner, B., Wiedensohler, A., & Manjarrez, M. (2010). How do the indoor size distributions of airborne submicron and ultrafine particles in the absence of significant indoor sources depend on outdoor distributions. Indoor Air, 13(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furtaw, E. J., Pandian, M. D., Nelson, D. R., & Behar, J. V. (1996). Modelling indoor air concentrations near emission sources in imperfectly mixed rooms. The Air and Waste Management Association, 46(9), 861–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamdani, S. E., Limam, K., Abadie, M. O., & Bendou, A. (2008). Deposition of fine particles on building internal surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 42(39), 8893–8901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinds, W. C. (1999). Properties, behaviour, and measurement of airborne particles. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31(9), 1121–1122.Google Scholar
  14. Hoek, G., Hanninen, O., & Cyrys, J. (2008). Indoor–outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 42(1), 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard-Reed, C., Wallace, L. A., & Ott, W. R. (2002). The effect of opening windows on air change rates in two homes. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 52(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) in Taiwan, The Study on Deposition of Particle in the Local Respiratory System, IOSH in Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 2012.Google Scholar
  17. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection: a Report of a Task Group of the ICRP, Elsevier Science Health Science Division, 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Kearney, J., Wallace, L. A., MacNeill, M., Xu, X., VanRyswyk, K., You, H., et al. (2011). Residential indoor and outdoor ultrafine particles in Windsor, Ontario. Atmospheric Environment, 45(40), 7583–7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lai, A. C. K., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2000). Modelling indoor particle deposition from turbulent flow onto smooth surfaces. Aerosol Science, 31, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lai, A. C. K., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2005). Supermicron particle deposition from turbulent chamber flow onto smooth and rough vertical surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 4893–4900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, J. Y., Ryu, S. H., Lee, G., & Bae, G. N. (2016). Indoor-to outdoor particle concentration ratio model for human exposure analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 127, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, Y., & Chen, Z. A. (2003). Balance-point method for assessing the effect of natural ventilation on indoor particle concentrations. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 4277–4285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, D. L., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2001). Modelling pollutant penetration across building envelopes. Atmospheric Environment, 35(26), 4451–4462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, D. L., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2003). Particle penetration through building cracks. Aerosol Science and Technology, 37, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long, C. M., Suh, H. H., & Koutrakis, P. (2000). Characterization of indoor particle sources using continuous mass and size monitors. The Air and Waste Management Association, 50(7), 1236–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Long, C. M., Suh, H. H., Catalano, P. J., & Koutrakis, P. (2001). Using time-and size-resolved particulate data to quantify indoor penetration and deposition behaviour. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(10), 2089–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mleczkowska, A., Strojecki, M., Bratasz, U., & Kozłowski, R. (2016). Particle penetration and deposition inside historical churches. Building and Environment, 95, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohammadyan, M., Ashmore, M., & Shabankhani, B. (2010). Indoor PM2.5 concentrations in the office, cafe, and home. International Journal of. Occupational Hygiene, 2(2), 57–62.Google Scholar
  29. Morawska, L., Ayoko, G. A., Bae, G. N., et al. (2017). Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure. Environment International, 108, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mosley, R. B., Greenwell, D. J., Sparks, L. E., Guo, Z., Tucker, W. G., Fortmann, R., et al. (2001). Penetration of ambient fine particles into the indoor environment. Aerosol Science and Technology, 34(1), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakorn, T., Khuntong, P., Nitatwichit, C., Khunatorn, Y., & Tantakitti, C. (2009). Indoor/outdoor relationships of size-resolved particle concentrations in naturally ventilated school environments. Building and Environment, 44(1), 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nazaroff, W. W. (2004). Indoor particle dynamics. Indoor Air, 14, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nazaroff, W. W., & Cass, G. R. (1989). Mass-transport aspects of pollution removal at indoor surface. Environment International, 15(1), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oberdoerster, G. (2000). Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles. International Archives of Occupational and Environment Health, 74(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Offerman, F. J., Sextro, R. J., Fisk, F. J., Gimsrud, D. T., Nazaroff, W. W., Nero, A. V., et al. (1985). Control of repairable particles in indoor air with portable air cleaners. Atmosphere Environment, 19, 1761–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riain, C. M. N., Davies, D. M., Harrison, R. M., & Byrne, M. A. (2003). Averaging periods for indoor-outdoor ratios of pollution in naturally ventilated non-domestic buildings near a busy road. Atmospheric Environment, 37(29), 4121–4132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riley, W. J., Mckone, T. E., Lai, A. C., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2002). Indoor particulate matter of outdoor origin: Importance of size-dependent removal mechanisms. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(2), 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rim, D., Wallace, L., & Persily, A. (2010). Infiltration of outdoor ultrafine particles into a test house. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(15), 5908–5913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rim, D., Wallace, L., & Persily, A. (2013). Indoor ultrafine particles of outdoor origin: Importance of window opening area and fan operation condition. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(4), 1922–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thatcher, T. L., & Layton, D. W. (1995). Deposition, resuspension and penetration of particles within a residence. Atmospheric Environment, 29(13), 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thatcher, T. L., Lai, A. C. K., Moreno-Jackson, R., Sextro, R. G., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2002). Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors. Atmospheric Environment, 36(11), 1811–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thatcher, T. L., Lunden, M. M., Revznn, K. L., Sextro, R. G., & Brown, N. J. (2003). A concentration rebound method for measuring particle penetration and deposition in the indoor environment. Aerosol Science and Technology, 37(11), 847–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thornburg, J., Ensor, D. S., Rodes, C. E., Lawless, P. A., Sparks, L. E., & Mosley, R. B. (2001). Penetration of particles into buildings and associated physical factors. part I: Model development and computer simulations. Aerosol Science and Technology, 34(3), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tran, D. T., Alleman, L. Y., Coddeville, P., Galloo, J. C. (2017). Indoor particle dynamics in schools: Determination of air exchange rate, size-resolved particle deposition rate and penetration factor in real-life conditions. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(10), 1335–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vette, A. F., Rea, A. W., Lawless, P. A., Rodes, C. E., Evans, G., Highsmith, V. R., et al. (2001). Characterization of indoor–outdoor aerosol concentration relationships during the Fresno PM exposure studies. Aerosol Science and Technology, 34(1), 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallace, L. A., & Williams, R. (2005). Use of personal-indoor-outdoor sulfur concentrations to estimate the infiltration factor and outdoor exposure factor for individual homes and persons. Environment Science and Technology, 39(6), 1707–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallace, L. A., Emmerich, S. J., & Howard-Reed, C. (2004). Effect of central fans and in-duct filters on deposition rates of ultrafine and fine particles in an occupied townhouse. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiong, M., & Gong, G. C. (2017). Influence of indoor air stability on suspended particle dispersion and deposition. Energy Procedia, 105, 4229–4235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu, M. D., Nematollahi, M., Sextro, R. G., Gadgil, A. J., William, W., & Nazaroff, W. W. (1994). Deposition of tobacco smoke particles in a low ventilation room. Aerosol Science and Technology, 20(2), 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu, K. P., Yang, K. R., Chen, Y. C., Gong, J. Y., Chen, Y. P., Shih, H. C., et al. (2015). Indoor air pollution from gas cooking in five Taiwanese families. Building and Environment, 93, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, M. W., Zhang, S. K., Feng, G. X., et al. (2017). Indoor airborne particle sources and outdoor haze days effect in urban office areas in Guangzhou. Environmental Research, 154, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao, B., & Wu, J. (2007). Particle deposition in indoor environments: Analysis of influencing factors. J Hazardous Mater, 147, 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu, Y. F., Hinds, W. C., Krudysz, M., Froines, J., & Sioutas, C. (2005). Penetration of freeway ultrafine particle into indoor environments. Journal of Aerosol Science, 36(3), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zollner, I., Gabrio, T., & Link, B. (2007). Concentrations of particulate matter in schools in Southwest Germany. Inhalation Toxicology, 19, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. C. Cong
    • 1
  • J. J. Zhao
    • 1
  • Z. Jing
    • 1
  • Q. G. Wang
    • 1
  • P. F. Ni
    • 1
  1. 1.Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and MitigationShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations