Advertisement

Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 1687–1704 | Cite as

Date palm waste-derived biochar composites with silica and zeolite: synthesis, characterization and implication for carbon stability and recalcitrant potential

  • Munir Ahmad
  • Mahtab Ahmad
  • Adel R. A. Usman
  • Abdullah S. Al-Faraj
  • Adel Abduljabbar
  • Yong Sik Ok
  • Mohammad I. Al-WabelEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Engineered organo-mineral composites were synthesized from date palm waste biochar and silica or zeolite via mechanochemical treatments. Date palm tree rachis (leaves) waste biomass was pre-treated with silica or zeolite minerals via ball milling and sonication prior to pyrolysis at 600 °C. The resultant organo-mineral composites and pristine materials were characterized using X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric–differential thermal (TG–DTA), Fourier transform infrared, scanning electron microscope analyses and surface area and porosity analyzer to investigate the variations in physiochemical and structural characteristics. Compared to the resultant composites derived from non-milled date palm biomass, ball milling increased surface area, while decreased crystallinity index and effective particle size of the biochar composites. Silica composited biochars were located near origin in the van Krevelen diagram indicating lowest H/C and O/C molar ratios, thus suggesting higher aromaticity and lower polarity compared to other biochars. TGA thermograms indicated highest thermal stability of silica composited biochars. Ash and moisture corrected TGA thermograms were used to calculate recalcitrance index (R50) of the materials, which speculated high degradability of biomass (R50 < 0.4), minimal degradability of biochars and zeolite composited biochars (0.5 < R50 < 0.7) and high recalcitrant nature of silica composited biochars (R50 > 0.7). Silica composited biochars exhibited highest carbon sequestration potential (64.17–95.59%) compared to other biochars. Highest recalcitrance and carbon sequestration potential of silica composited biochars may be attributed to changes in structural arrangements in the silica–biochar complex. Encapsulations of biochar particles with amorphous silica via Si–C bonding may have prevented thermal degradation, subsequently increasing recalcitrance potential of silica composited biochars.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration Engineered biochar Organo-mineral Recalcitrance index Encapsulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, for funding this work through the international research group project IRG-14-14.

Supplementary material

10653_2017_9947_MOESM1_ESM.docx (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 51 kb)

References

  1. Ahmad, M., Moon, D. H., Vithanage, M., Koutsospyros, A., Lee, S. S., Yang, J. E., et al. (2014a). Production and use of biochar from buffalo-weed (Ambrosia trifida L.) for trichloroethylene removal from water. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 89, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, M., Mohan, D., et al. (2014b). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altland, J. E., Locke, J. C., & Krause, C. R. (2014). Influence of pine bark particle size and pH on cation exchange capacity. HortTechnology, 24, 554–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Wabel, M. I., Al-Omran, A., El-Naggar, A. H., Nadeem, M., & Usman, A. R. A. (2013). Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresource Technology, 131, 374–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1989). Standard Methods for Chemical Analysis of Wood Charcoal, ASTM D1762-84, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Antal, J. M. J., & Grönli, M. (2003). The art science, and technology of charcoal production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42, 1619–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilgic, C. (2005). Investigation of the factors affecting organic cation adsorption on some silicate minerals. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 281, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, G. J., Lefroy, R. D. B., & Lisle, L. (1995). Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 46, 1459–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonenfant, D., Kharoune, M., Niquette, P., Mimeault, M., & Hausler, R. (2008). Advances in principal factors influencing carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolite. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, C. H., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., Burton, S. D., & Engelhard, M. H. (2006). Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Organic Geochemistry, 37, 1477–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deya, R. D., & Airoldi, C. (2008). Designed pendant chain covalently bonded to silica gel for cation removal. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fosso-kankeu, E., Waanders, F. B., Steyn, F. W. (2015). The preparation and characterization of clay-biochar composites for the removal of metal pollutants. In 7th International Conference on latest Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICLTET’2015), At Irene Pretoria South Africa, Volume: ISBN 978-93-84422-58-2. pp. 53–57.Google Scholar
  13. Fowles, M. (2007). Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greathouse, J. A., Johnson, K. L., & Greenwell, H. C. (2014). Interaction of natural organic matter with layered minerals: Recent developments in computational methods at the nanoscale. Minerals, 4, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Insights on the molecular mechanism for the recalcitrance of biochars: Interactive effects of carbon and silicon components. Environmental Science and Technology, 48, 9103–9112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gurses, A., Dogar, C., Yalcin, M., Acikyildiz, M., Bayrak, R., & Karaca, S. (2006). The adsorption kinetics of the cationic dye, methylene blue, onto clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 131, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, O. R., Kuo, L. J., Zimmerman, A. R., Louchouarn, P., Amonette, J. E., & Herbert, B. E. (2012). An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 1415–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendershot, W. H., Lalande, H., & Duquette, M. (2008). Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In M. R. Carter & E. G. Gregorich (Eds.), Soil sampling and methods of analysis (2nd ed., pp. 197–206). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inyang, M., Gao, B., Pullammanappallil, P., Ding, W., & Zimmerman, A. R. (2010). Biochar from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse. Bioresource Technology, 101, 8868–8872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Izhevskyil, V. A., Genova, L. A., Bressiani, J. C., & Bressiani, A. H. A. (2000). Review article: Silicon carbide. Structure, properties and processing. Cerâmica, 46, 297. doi: 10.1590/S0366-69132000000100002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joseph, S. D., Camps-Arbestain, M., Lin, Y., Munroe, P., Chia, C. H., Hook, J., et al. (2010). An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 48, 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joseph, S., Graber, E. R., Chia, C., Munroe, P., Donne, S., Thomas, T., et al. (2013). Shifting paradigms: Development of high-efficiency biochar fertilizers based on nano-structures and soluble components. Carbon Management, 4, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jouiad, M., Al-Nofeli, N., Khalifa, N., Benyettou, F., & Yousef, L. F. (2015). Characteristics of slow pyrolysis biochars produced from rhodes grass and fronds of edible date palm. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 111, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Johnson, M. G., & Kleber, M. (2010). Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 1247–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuzyakov, Y., Subbotina, I., Chen, H., Bogomolova, I., & Xu, X. (2009). Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laird, D. A. (2008). The charcoal vision: A win win win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal, 100, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lal, R. (2003). Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 22, 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Soils—the final Frontier. Science, 304, 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmann, J. (2007). A handful of carbon. Nature, 447, 143–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehmann, D. J., & Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology London. Sterling, VA: Earthscans.Google Scholar
  32. Lehmann, J., Liang, B. Q., Solomon, D., Lerotic, M., Luiza˘o, F., Kinyangi, J., et al. (2005). Nearedge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy for mapping nano-scale distribution of organic carbon forms in soil: Application to black carbon particles. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB1013. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenton, T. M., & Vaughan, N. E. (2009). The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 9, 2559–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O’Neill, B., et al. (2006). Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1719–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, R., Shi, Y., Wan, Y., Meng, Y., Zhang, F., Gu, D., et al. (2006). Triconstituent co-assembly to ordered mesostructured polymer-silica and carbon-silica nanocomposites and large-pore mesoporous carbons with high surface areas. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, 11652–11662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lowell, S., Shields, J. E., Thomas, M. A., & Thommes, M. (2004). Characterization of porous solids and powders: Surface area, pore size and density. In B. Scarlett (Ed.), Practicle Technology series. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Mukherjee, A., Zimmerman, A. R., & Harris, W. (2011). Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma, 163, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murillo, J. D., Ware, E. A., & Biernacki, J. J. (2014). Characterization of milling effects on the physical and chemicalnature of herbaceous biomass with comparison of fast pyrolysisproduct distributions using Py-GC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 108, 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murray, H. H., & Lyons, S. C. (1959). Further correlations of kaolinite crystallinity with chemical and physical properties. Clays and Clay Minerals, 8, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Odeh, A. O. (2015). Comparative study of the aromaticity of the coal structure during the cahr formation process under both conventional and advanced analytical techniques. Energy & Fuels, 29, 2676–2684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ok, Y. S., Chang, S. X., Gao, B., & Chung, H. J. (2015). SMART biochar technology—a shifting paradigm towards advanced materials and healthcare research. Environmental Technology and Innovation, 4, 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qiu, M., Sun, K., Jin, J., Gao, B., Yan, Y., Han, L., et al. (2014). Properties of the plant- and manure-derived biochars and their sorption of dibutyl phthalate and phenanthrene. Scientific Reports, 4, 5295. doi: 10.1038/srep05295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rajapaksha, A. U., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Zhang, M., Vithanage, M., Mandal, S., et al. (2016). Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: Potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere, 148, 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rawal, A., Joseph, S. D., Hook, J. M., Chia, C. H., Munroe, P. R., Donne, S., et al. (2016). Mineral–Biochar composites: Molecular structure and porosity. Environmental Science and Technology, 50, 7706–7714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rumpel, C., Gonzalez-Perez, J. A., Bardoux, G., Largeau, C., Gonzalez-Vila, F. J., & Valentin, C. (2007). Composition and reactivity of morphologically distinct charred materials left after slash-and-burn practices in agricultural tropical soils. Organic Geochemistry, 38, 911–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scheirs, J., Camino, G., & Tumiatti, W. (2001). Overview of water evolution during the thermal degradation of cellulose. European Polymer Journal, 37, 933–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt, M. W. I., & Noack, A. G. (2000). Black carbon in soils and sediments: Analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 14, 777–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of biochar in soils: Predictability of O: C molar ratios. Carbon Management, 1, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Usman, A. R. A., Abduljabbar, A., Vithanage, M., Ok, Y. S., Ahmad, M., Ahmad, M., et al. (2015). Biochar production from date palm waste: Charring temperature induced changes in composition and surface chemistry. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 115, 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, Y., Lu, H., Liu, Y., & Yang, S. (2016). Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by SiO2 biochar nanocomposites prepared by pyrolysis of vermiculite treated algal biomass. RSC Advances, 6, 83534–83546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Windeatt, J. H., Ross, A. B., Williams, P. T., Forster, P. M., Nahil, M. A., & Singh, S. (2014). Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiao, X., Chen, B., & Zhu, L. (2014). Transformation, morphology and dissolution of silicon and carbon in rice straw derived biochars under different pyrolytic temperatures. Environmental Science and Technology, 48, 3411–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., & Zheng, C. (2007). Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86, 1781–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yao, Y., Gao, B., Fang, J., Zhang, M., Chen, H., Zhou, Y., et al. (2014). Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 242, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhao, L., Cao, X., Masek, O., & Zimmerman, A. (2013). Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 256–257, 1–9.Google Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, A. R., Gao, B., & Ahn, M. Y. (2011). Positive, negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmermann, M., Bird, M. I., Wurster, C., Saiz, G., Goodrick, I., Barta, J., et al. (2012). Rapid degradation of pyrogenic carbon. Global Change Biology, 18, 3306–3316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Munir Ahmad
    • 1
  • Mahtab Ahmad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adel R. A. Usman
    • 1
    • 3
  • Abdullah S. Al-Faraj
    • 1
  • Adel Abduljabbar
    • 4
  • Yong Sik Ok
    • 5
  • Mohammad I. Al-Wabel
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Soil Sciences Department, College of Food and Agricultural SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological SciencesQuaid-I-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of AgricultureAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  4. 4.Industrial Psychology, College of EducationKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Korea Biochar Research Center and Department of Biological EnvironmentKangwon National UniversityChuncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations