Advertisement

Exploring the Development and Research Focus of Cognitive Load Theory, as Described by Its Founders: Interviewing John Sweller, Fred Paas, and Jeroen van Merriënboer

  • Myrto F. MavilidiEmail author
  • Lijia Zhong
Interview

Abstract

This manuscript presents an interview with John Sweller, Fred Paas, and Jeroen van Merrienboer about cognitive load theory. It presents the views of these main founders of the theory on the progress from the first major publication on the theory in 1998 (Sweller, Van Merrienboer, & Paas, Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296, 1998) to the current publication, 20 years later in 2018 (Sweller, Van Merrienboer, & Paas, Educational Psychology Review,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5, 2019). More specifically, the interview focuses on challenges and opportunities of cognitive load theory and the associated instructional design research, the role of measurement of cognitive load and mental efficiency, as well as the instructional control of cognitive load in the cognitive load research. The interview is concluded with suggestions and advice for young researchers.

Keywords

Cognitive load theory Interview Cognitive load measurement Advice for young researchers 

Notes

References

  1. Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 389–400.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2017). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 483–501.Google Scholar
  5. Choi, H. H., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 225–244.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(1), 68–82.Google Scholar
  7. De Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Bridging cognitive load and self-regulated learning research: a complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 51, 1–9.Google Scholar
  8. Geary, D., & Berch, D. (2016). Evolution and children's cognitive and academic development. In D. Geary & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 217–249). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, T., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42.Google Scholar
  10. Mehta, R., Zhu, R., & Cheema, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784–799.Google Scholar
  11. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319–334.Google Scholar
  12. Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.Google Scholar
  13. Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133.Google Scholar
  14. Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 419–430.Google Scholar
  15. Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 181–186.Google Scholar
  16. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
  17. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34.Google Scholar
  18. Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Leutner, D. (2015). Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings. Instructional Science, 43(1), 93–114.Google Scholar
  19. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89.Google Scholar
  20. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.Google Scholar
  21. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.
  22. Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
  23. Van Gog, T., Kirschner, F., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2012). Timing and frequency of mental effort measurement: evidence in favour of repeated measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 833–839.Google Scholar
  24. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 265–285.Google Scholar
  25. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers and Education, 64, 153–160.Google Scholar
  26. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(3), 365–394.Google Scholar
  27. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning (3rd rev ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Krammer, H. P. M. (1987). Instructional strategies and tactics for the design of introductory computer programming courses in high school. Instructional Science, 16(3), 251–285.Google Scholar
  29. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93.Google Scholar
  30. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Jelsma, O., & Paas, F. (1992). Training for reflective expertise: a four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 40(2), 23–43.Google Scholar
  31. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: the 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(2), 39–64.Google Scholar
  32. Xie, B., & Salvendy, G. (2000). Review and reappraisal of modelling and predicting mental workload in single-and multi-task environments. Work & Stress, 14(1), 74–99.Google Scholar
  33. Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 231–247.Google Scholar
  34. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of EducationUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Early StartUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Foreign Language, QianJiang CollegeHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhouChina
  4. 4.Department of Curriculum and Learning Sciences, College of EducationZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations