Female Participation as Top-Producing Authors, Editors, and Editorial Board Members in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2016
This article examines top-producing female authors, editors, and editorial board members in five educational psychology journals (i.e., Cognition and Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Educational Psychologist, Educational Psychology Review, and Journal of Educational Psychology) from 2009 to 2016. Results extend data from four previous studies (Evans et al. Educational Psychology Review, 17(3), 263–271, 2005; Fong et al. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–277, 2009; Greenbaum et al. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 215–223, 2016; Robinson et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 331–343, 1998) and also compare top female authors to the top male authors. The top-producing women in the field have, on average, less seniority in the field than do top male authors. Male authors have more publications, on average, and more sole authorships and first authorships, as compared to female authors. No discernible progress has been made by women in terms of editorial board memberships or editorships since 2004.
KeywordsPublication productivity Educational psychology Gender
- American Educational Research Association. (2018). Total AERA membership by member type, 2007 to 2017. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2016). Demographic characteristics of Division 15 members by membership status. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/division/officers/services/div15-2016.pdf.
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Demographic characteristics of APA members by membership type. http://www.apa.org/workforce/publications/16-member-profiles/index.aspx?tab=2.
- Clay, R. A. (2017). Women outnumber men in psychology, but not in the field’s top echelons. Monitor on Psychology, 48, 18.Google Scholar
- Fong, C. J., Yoo, J. H., Jones, S. J., Torres, L. G., & Decker, M. L. (2009). Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9108-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenbaum, H., Meyer, L., Smith, M. C., Barber, A., Henderson, H., Riel, D., & Robinson, D. H. (2016). Individual and institutional productivity in educational psychology journals from 2009 to 2014. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9360-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while female: evidence of gender bias in peer review scrutiny. Retrieved online at http://www.erinhengel.com/research/publishing_female.pdf.
- Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4), 540–557.Google Scholar
- Morton, M. J., & Sonnad, S. S. (2007). Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(7), 764–771.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, C. S., Jackson, A. A., Johnson, L. S., Lange, H., & Mathis, F. S. (2003). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997-2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00044-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stegmaier, M., Palmer, B., & Van Assendelft, L. (2011). Getting on the board: the presence of women in political science journal editorial positions. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 799–800.Google Scholar