Advertisement

“Well, That Just Comes with Being a Mama”: The Gendered Nature of Family Literacy Programs

  • Jessica RizkEmail author
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing on ethnographic research, this paper investigates the gendered involvement in early literacy programs at one central library in the Greater Toronto Area. This study consisted of observations and field notes across family literacy programs, along with in-depth interviews with librarians and mother attendees. In particular, this research explores the invisible labour of mother involvement in “family” literacy programs targeting children aged 0–8, along with the role of librarians in structuring such early literacy programs. Referring largely to Griffith and Smith’s (Mothering for schooling, RoutledgeFalmer, New York, 2005) notion of the mothering discourse, this study suggests that there are specific kinds of early literacy work that are deemed “appropriate” and “valued” (i.e., taking trips to the library; being read to daily, turning everyday domestic labour into teachable moments), and certain individuals (i.e., moms) who are assumed or expected to carry out such work at home. This study also reveals that both mothers and librarians continue to participate in dominant discourses of mothering, specifically in relation to early literacy work assumed to prepare children for schooling. Such findings have implications for future research that considers mothering work and early resource supports for families.

Keywords

Early literacy Gender Mothering discourses Family literacy 

Notes

Funding

The funding was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant no. 766-2012-4247-A28).

References

  1. Allen, S., & Hawkins, A. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and Family,61(1), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach, E. (1997). Reading between the lines. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Many families, many literacies: An international declaration of principles (pp. 71–81). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Trade.Google Scholar
  3. Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouma, G., Ling, R., & Wilkinson, L. (2012). The research process: second (Canadian ed.). Don Mills, CA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bryman, A., Bell, E., & Teevan, J. J. (2009). Social research methods. Don Mills, CA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cairney, T. (2003). Literacy within family life. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 85–98). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carriero, R., & Todesco, L. (2018). Housework division and gender ideology. When do attitudes really matter? Demographic Research,39, 1039–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson, J, H. (2009). Mothers as partners in early childhood in education: Comparison of an even start and a family resource centre program. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (UMI No: 3342168).Google Scholar
  9. Caspe, M. (2003). Family literacy. A review of programs and critical perspectives. (Research Report). Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine/resources/research/literacy.html.
  10. Chowdorow, N. (1999). The reproduction of mothering: psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, C. (2009). Why fathers matter to their children’s literacy. London: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
  12. Cuban, S., & Hayes, E. (1996). Women in family literacy programs: A gendered perspective. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,70, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeBruin-Parecki, A., & Krol-Sinclair, B. (2003). Afterward. In A. DeBruin-Parecki & B. Krol-Sinclair (Eds.), Family literacy: From theory to practice (pp. 303–310). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  14. Dudley-Marling, C. (2002). School trouble: A mother’s burden. Gender and Education,13(2), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gadsden, V. (2003). Expanding the concept of “family” in family literacy: Integrating a focus on fathers. In A. DeBruin-Parecki & B. Krol-Sinclair (Eds.), Family literacy: from theory to practice (pp. 86–125). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  16. Gatrell, C. (2005). Hard labour: the sociology of parenthood. New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert, N. (2008). A mother’s work: How feminism, the market, and policy shape family life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Griffith, A., & Smith, D. (1991). Constructing cultural knowledge: Mothering as discourse. In J. Gaskell & A. MacLaren (Eds.), Women and education (2nd ed., pp. 87–103). Calgary, CA: Detselin Enterprises Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Griffith, A., & Smith, D. (2005). Mothering for schooling. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannon, P. (2003). Family literacy programmes. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 99–111). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannon, P., Morgan, A., & Nutbrown, C. (2006). Parent’s experiences of a family literacy programme. Journal of Early Childhood Research,4(1), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Horne, R., Johnson, M., Galambos, N., & Krahn, H. (2018). Time, money or gender? Predictors of the division of household labour across life stages. Sex Roles,78, 731–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horwitz, E., & Long, B. (2005). Mothering and stress discourses: A deconstruction of the interrelationship of discourses on mothering and stress. In M. Porter, A. O’Reilly, & P. Short (Eds.), Motherhood: Power and oppression (pp. 97–110). Toronto, CA: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. Karther, D. (2002). Fathers with low literacy and their young children. The Reading Teacher,56(2), 184–193.Google Scholar
  28. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
  30. Leseman, P., & Jong, P. (1998). Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly,33, 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynch, J. (2008). Engagement with print: Low-income families and head start children. Journal of Childhood Literacy,8(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lyonette, C., & Crompton, R. (2015). Sharing the load? Partners’ relative earnings and the division of domestic labour. Work, Employment & Society,29(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marvasti, A. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maushart, S. (1999). The mask of motherhood: How becoming a mother changes everything and why we pretend it doesn’t. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  35. Milkie, M., Bianchi, S., Mattingly, M., & Robinson, J. (2002). Gendered division of childrearing: Ideals, realities, and the relationship to parental well-being. Sex Roles,1(2), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millard, E. (2003). Gender and early childhood literacy. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 327–337). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, T. (2007). “Is this what motherhood is all about?” Weaving experiences and discourse through transition to first-time motherhood. Gender and Society,21(3), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan, A., Nutbrown, C., & Hannon, P. (2009). Fathers’ involvement in young children’s literacy development; Implications for family literacy programmes. British Educational Research Journal,35(2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neuman, L., & Robson, K. (2009). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  40. Nichols, S., Nixon, H., & Rowsell, J. (2009). The ‘good’ parent in relation to early childhood literacy: Symbolic terrain and lived practice. Literacy,43(2), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nutbrown, C., Hannon, P., & Morgan, A. (2005). Early literacy work with families: Policy, practice and research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. O’Reilly, A. (2008). Feminist mothering. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  43. Palm, G., & Fagan, J. (2008). Father involvement in early childhood programs: Review of the literature. Early Child Development and Care,178(7–8), 745–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paratore, J. (2003). Building on family literacies: Examining the past and planning the future. In A. DeBruin-Parecki & B. Krol-Sinclair (Eds.), Family literacy: From theory to practice (pp. 8–27). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  45. Purcell-Gates, V. (2001). Emergent literacy is emerging knowledge of written, not oral, language. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,92, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rizk, J. (2013). Early literacy begins with… whom? An exploration of mothering work as a component in students’ educational success. Masters Thesis. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis Database.Google Scholar
  47. Rodriguez-Brown, F. (2003). Family literacy in English language learning communities: Issues related to program development, implementation, and practice. In A. DeBruin-Parecki & B. Krol-Sinclair (Eds.), Family literacy: From theory to practice (pp. 126–146). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  48. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruddick, S. (1996). The idea of fatherhood. In H. Lindemann (Ed.), Feminisms and families (pp. 205–220). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Saracho, O. (2008). Fathers’ and young children’s literacy experiences. Early Child Development and Care,7–8, 837–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sipe, L., & Ghiso, M. (2004). Constructing conceptual categories in classroom descriptive research: Some problems and possibilities. Anthropology in Education Quarterly,35(4), 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, D. E. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  55. Smythe, S. (2006). The good mother: A critical discourse analysis of literacy advice to mothers in the 20th century. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No: NR19910).Google Scholar
  56. Smythe, S., & Isserlis, J. (2002). Regulating women and families: Mothering discourses in family literacy texts. English Quarterly,34(3/4), 1–17.Google Scholar
  57. Stake, R. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Standing, K. (1999). Lone mother’s involvement in their children’s schooling: Towards a new typology of maternal involvement. Gender and Education,11(1), 57–73l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sunderland, J. (2006). ‘Parenting’ or ‘mothering’? The case of modern childcare magazines. Discourse & Society,17(4), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, D. (1983). Family literacy: Young children learning to read and write. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  61. Walkerdine, V., & Lucey, H. (1989). Democracy in the Kitchen: Regulating mothers and socialising daughters. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wasik, B., & Herrmann, S. (2004). Family literacy: History, concepts, services. In B. Wasik (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 3–22). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wasik, B. H., & Van Horn, B. (2012). The role of family literacy in society. In B. H. Wasik (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations