Pre-engineering Thinking and the Engineering Habits of Mind in Preschool Classroom
- 389 Downloads
Young children engage in pre-engineering thinking and play in their day-to-day activities. However, early childhood teachers often miss opportunities to facilitate and extend this type of play. In order to support teachers in this undertaking, the current study aimed to answer the question: What does pre-engineering thinking look like in preschool? Nine preschool classrooms were observed, and mixed-methods, multiple case study analyses were conducted with classroom observation data as well as teacher-reported data. Our findings indicate that children engage in engineering habits of mind throughout the classroom, children’s access to materials and time to generate their own problems of interest are crucial, and teachers were often uninvolved when children demonstrated engineering habits of mind. Notably, teachers with > 5 years of teaching experience and lower teaching efficacy related to behavior management and engaging children in learning activities had classrooms with zero or few occurrences of engineering habits of mind. These results suggest that teachers may need support in engaging children in learning activities and managing classroom discipline before they undertake engineering-specific professional development. Topics to address in continuing professional development should focus on classroom environments, materials, and interactions that encourage children in generating and solving problems of their own interest as a way to facilitate pre-engineering thinking.
KeywordsPre-engineering thinking Engineering habits of mind Preschool
Funding was provided by Iowa State University (US) College of Human Sciences and Iowa State University College of Engineering.
- Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Parley, A. L., et al. (2013). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 48–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2011). Starting young: Learning outcomes of a developmentally appropriate PreK engineering curriculum. In Proceedings of the research in engineering education symposium. Madrid: Universidad Politecnica de Madres. http://rees2009.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/63149087/REES%202011%20proceedings.pdf.
- Bagiati, A., Evangelou, D., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2011). Exposure to early engineering: A parental perspective. In Proceedings of the American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition. Vancouver, BC: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/exposure-to-early-engineering-a-parental-perspective.
- Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2012). The role of classroom artifacts in developmental engineering. In Proceedings of the American society for engineering education annual conference. San Antonio, TX: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/the-role-of-classroom-artifacts-in-developmental-engineering.
- Bers, M. U., Seddighin, S., & Sullivan, A. (2013). Ready for robotics: Bringing together the T and E of STEM in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 355–377. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/41987/.
- Brophy, S. P., & Evangelou, D. (2007). Precursors to engineering thinking (PET). In Proceedings of the annual conference of the American society of engineering education. Washington, DC: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/3011.
- Cardella, M. E., Svarovsky, G. N., & Dorie, B. L. (2013). Gender research on adult-child discussions within informal engineering environments (GRADIENT) early findings. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the American society of engineering education. Atlanta, GA: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/19649.
- Copple, C., & Brendekamp, S. (Eds.) (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, C. M., & Hester, K. (2007). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. In Proceedings of the American society for engineering education annual conference. Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
- Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, G. N. (2014). Capturing the design thinking of young children interacting with a parent. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the American society of engineering education. Washington, DC: ASEE.Google Scholar
- Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, G. N. (2015). Engineering together: Context in dyadic talk during an engineering task. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the American society of engineering education. Seattle, WA: ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/20147.
- Early Childhood Iowa. (2012). Iowa early learning standards. Retrieved from https://www.educateiowa.gov/documents/early-childhood/2014/10/iowa-early-learning-standards-2012.
- Evangelou, D., Dobbs-Oates, J., Bagiati, A., Liang, S., & Choi, J. Y. (2010). Talking about artifacts: Preschool children’s explorations with sketches, stories, and tangible objects. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bagiati.html.
- Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20, 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harms, T., Clifford, R. M., & Cryer, D. (2015). Early childhood environment rating scale (third edition). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). The status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the United States. The Bridge, 39, 5–10. Retrieved from https://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/16145/16161.aspx.
- Keren, G., Ben-David, A., & Fridin, M. (2012). Kindergarten assistive robotics (KAR) as a tool for spatial cognition in pre-school education. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE: Vilamoura. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385645.
- Loveland, T., & Dunn, D. (2014). Engineering Habits of Mind in Technology Education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Lucas, C. G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Gopnik, A. (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition, 131, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.Google Scholar
- Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moser, A., Zimmermann, L., Dickerson, K., Grenell, A., Barr, R., & Gerhardstein, P. (2015). They can interact, but can they learn? Toddlers’ transfer learning from touchscreens and television. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (NAE and NRC). (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- North Carolina Foundations Task Force. (2013). North Carolina foundations for early learning and development. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Foundations Task Force.Google Scholar
- Pawlina, S., & Stanford, C. (2011). Preschoolers grow their brains: Shifting mindsets for greater resiliency and better problem solving. Young Children, 66(5), 30–35.Google Scholar
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education for America’s future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stem-ed-final.pdf.
- Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268–302. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2010). Toward the identification of features of effective professional development for early childhood educattors, literature review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85, 1062–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar