Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 95–104 | Cite as

Otolith microchemistry reveals partial migration and life history variation in a facultatively anadromous, iteroparous salmonid, bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)

  • Catherine S. AustinEmail author
  • Morgan H. Bond
  • Joseph M. Smith
  • Erin D. Lowery
  • Thomas P. Quinn
Article

Abstract

Migration of fishes between habitats influences population dynamics and ecological interactions. Some “partially migratory” populations include both migratory and non-migratory individuals, adding complexity to these dynamics. For partially migratory fishes with diadromous life histories, freshwater and marine habitats can differ greatly in availability of prey and physical conditions conducive to growth, predation risk, and exposure to fisheries and to contaminants. Therefore, understanding patterns of migratory behavior can inform population biology and conservation. Using otolith microchemistry, we describe observations of partial anadromy in a threatened, iteroparous salmonid species, bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), in the Skagit River basin of Washington State, USA. We found that 59% of the fish sampled (> 338 mm fork length) in the river had not been to marine water, despite easy access. The other 41% had migrated to salt water, typically every year beginning at age 2 or 3. We also observed overwintering in marine waters by some individuals, and extended time in fresh water between otherwise annual migrations to marine waters in others. Additionally, there was no obligatory relationship between anadromy in mothers and their offspring. The facultative nature of migration in this species, and the lack of tight connection between maternal and offspring life history patterns are consistent with studies of other Salvelinus species but contrast with the more rigid controls on migration in semelparous salmonids.

Keywords

Partial migration Partial anadromy Salmonids Char Bull trout Otoliths LA-ICP-MS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrew Fowler, Jacob Castle, Shawn Turnbull, Steve Damm, Sandie O’Neill, Jay Davis, Jeffery Chan, and Maureen Small, for otolith samples and data assistance. Katherine Wold and Zachary Houghtaling prepared samples for analysis. Microchemical analysis was performed under the guidance of Andy Ungerer and Brad Pitcher (Oregon State University W. M. Keck Collaboratory for Plasma Spectrometry) and Alex Gagnon and Tamas Ugrai (University of Washington). Martini Arostegui helped improve the manuscript. This work was generously supported by Seattle City Light, the Richard and Lois Worthington Endowment, and the International Women’s Fishing Association.

Supplementary material

10641_2019_848_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (56 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 56 kb)

References

  1. Arai T, Morita K (2005) Evidence of multiple migrations between freshwater and marine habitats of Salvelinus leucomaenis. J Fish Biol 66:888–895.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00654.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong RH (1974) Migration of anadromous Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) in southeastern Alaska. J Fish Res Board Can 31:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong JB, Bond MH (2013) Phenotype flexibility in wild fish: Dolly Varden regulate assimilative capacity to capitalize on annual pulsed subsidies. J Anim Ecol 82:966–975.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beamer E, Henderson R, Wolf K (2004) Bull trout use of Swinomish reservation waters. Skagit River System Cooperative, LaConnerGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard DR, Hepler KR, Jones JD, Whalen ME, McBride DN (1995) Some tests of the “migration hypothesis” for anadromous Dolly Varden (southern form). Trans Am Fish Soc 124:297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackett RF (1973) Fecundity of resident and anadromous Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) in Southeastern Alaska. J Fish Res Board Can 30:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond MH, Quinn TP (2013) Patterns and influences on Dolly Varden migratory timing in the Chignik Lakes, Alaska, and comparison of populations throughout the northeastern Pacific and Arctic oceans. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond MH, Miller JA, Quinn TP (2015) Beyond dichotomous life histories in partially migrating populations: cessation of anadromy in a long-lived fish. Ecology 96:1899–1910.  https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1551.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenkman SJ, Corbett SC (2005) Extent of anadromy in bull trout and implications for conservation of a threatened species. N Am J Fish Manag 25:1073–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1577/M04-132.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenkman SJ, Corbett SC, Volk EC (2007) Use of otolith chemistry and radiotelemetry to determine age-specific migratory patterns of anadromous bull trout in the Hoh River, Washington. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1577/T05-285.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodersen J, Nicolle A, Nilsson PA, Skov C, Brönmark C, Hansson LA (2011) Interplay between temperature, fish partial migration and trophic dynamics. Oikos 120:1838–1846.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19433.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown RJ, Loewen MB, Tanner TL (2014) Overwintering locations, migrations, and fidelity of radio-tagged Dolly Varden in the Hulahula River, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 2007–09. Arctic 67:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campana SE (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:263–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman BB, Hulthén K, Brodersen J, Nilsson P-A, Skov C, Hansson L-A, Brönmark C (2012) Partial migration in fishes: causes and consequences. J Fish Biol 81:456–478.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03342.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chasco B, Kaplan IC, Thomas A, Acevedo-Gutiérrez A, Noren D, Ford MJ, Hanson MB, Scordino J, Jeffries S, Pearson S, Marshall KN, Ward EJ (2017) Estimates of Chinook salmon consumption in Washington State inland waters by four marine mammal predators from 1970–2015. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74:1173–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) (2012) Assessment and status report on the bull trout Salvelinus confluentus in Canada. http://www.registrelep-sararegistrygcca/defaultasp?lang=En&n=D869E8D8-1 Accessed 10 October 2017
  17. Dennert AM, May-McNally SL, Bond MH, Quinn TP, Taylor EB (2016) Trophic biology and migratory patterns of sympatric Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can J Zool 539:529–539.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dingle H (1996) Migration: the biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodson JJ, Aubin-Horth N, Thériault V, Páez DJ (2013) The evolutionary ecology of alternative migratory tactics in salmonid fishes. Biol Rev 88:602–625.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doubleday ZA, Harris HH, Izzo C, Gillanders BM (2014) Strontium randomly substituting for calcium in fish otolith aragonite. Anal Chem 86:865–869.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4034278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunham J, Rieman B, Chandler G (2003) Influences of temperature and environmental variables on the distribution of bull trout within streams at the southern margin of its range. N Am Jour of Fish Management 23(3):894–904.  https://doi.org/10.1577/M02-028
  22. Dunham J, Baxter C, Fausch K, Fredenberg W, Kitano S, Koizumi I, Morita K, Nakamura T, Rieman B, Saavaitova K, Stanford J, Taylor E, Yamamoto S (2008) Evolution, ecology, and conservation of Dolly Varden, white-spotted char, and bull trout. Fisheries 33:537–550.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446-33.11.537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eckmann M, Dunham J, Connor EJ, Welch CA (2018) Bioenergetic evaluation of diel vertical migration by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in a thermally stratified reservoir. Ecol Freshw Fish 27:30–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elsdon TS, Gillanders BM (2005) Alternative life-history patterns of estuarine fish: barium in otoliths elucidates freshwater residency. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1143–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ewald G, Larsson P, Linge H, Okla L, Szarzi N (1998) Biotransport of organic pollutants to an inland Alaska lake by migrating sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Arctic 51:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finstad AG, Hein CL (2012) Migrate or stay: terrestrial primary productivity and climate drive anadromy in Arctic char. Glob Chang Biol 18:2487–2497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02717.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraley JJ, Shepherd BB (1989) Life history, ecology, and population status of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Flathead Lake and river system, Montana. Northwest Sci 63:133–143Google Scholar
  28. Gende SM, Edwards RT, Willson MF, Wipfli MS (2002) Pacific salmon in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. BioSci 52:917–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U.S. Geological Survey (2017) National water information system, USGS water data for the nation. https://waterwatch.usgs.gov/?m=real&r=wa&w=map. Accessed 30 November 2017
  30. Goetz FA (2016) Migration and residence patterns of salmonids in Puget Sound. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross MR (1987) Evolution of diadromy in fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp 1:14–25Google Scholar
  32. Gyllensten U (1985) The genetic structure of fish: differences in the intraspecific distribution of biochemical genetic variation between marine, anadromous, and freshwater species. J Fish Biol 26:691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gyselman EC, Broughton KE (1991) Data on the anadromous charr, (Salvelinus alpinus) of Nauyuk Lake, Northwest Territories 1974-1988. Can Data Rep Fish Aquat Sci 815:125Google Scholar
  34. Haas GR, McPhail JD (1991) Systematics and distributions of Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:2191–2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris LN, Bajno R, Gallagher CP, Koizumi I, Johnson LK, Howland KL, Taylor EB, Reist JD (2015) Life-history characteristics and landscape attributes as drivers of genetic variation, gene flow, and fine-scale population structure in northern Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma malma) in Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:1477–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayes MC, Rubin SP, Reisenbichler RP, Goetz FA, Jeanes E, McBride A (2011) Marine habitat use by anadromous bull trout from the Skagit River, Washington. Marine Coastal Fish 31:394–410.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2011.640893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jaecks T, Quinn TP (2014) Ontogenetic shift to dependence on salmon-derived nutrients in Dolly Varden char from the Iliamna River, Alaska. Env Biol Fish 97(12):1323–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0221-3
  38. Johnston FD, Post JR, Mushens CJ, Stelfox JD, Paul AJ, Lajeunesse B (2007) The demography of recovery of an overexploited bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus, population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:113–126.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f06-172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jonsson B, Jonsson N (2001) Polymorphism and speciation in Arctic charr. J Fish Biol 58:605–638.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2000.1515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jonsson B, Jonsson N (2011) Ecology of Atlantic Salmon and Brown trout: habitat as a template for life histories. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalish JM (1990) Use of otolith microchemistry to distinguish the progeny of sympatric anadromous and non-anadromous salmonids. Fish Bull 88:657–666Google Scholar
  42. Kissinger BC, Harris LN, Swainson D, Anderson WG, Docker MF, Reist JD (2018) Fine-scale population structure in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) influenced by life history variation in the Husky Lakes drainage basin, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75:1070–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lord JK (1866) The naturalist in Vancouver Island and British Columbia, volume 1, 2005th edn. Adamant Media Corporation, Port ChesterGoogle Scholar
  44. Lowery ED, Beauchamp DA (2015) Trophic ontogeny of fluvial bull trout and seasonal predation on Pacific salmon in a riverine food web. Trans Am Fish Soc 144:724–741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2015.1035452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDowall RM (1988) Diadromy in fishes: migrations between freshwater and saltwater environments. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  46. McPhail JD, Baxter JS (1996) A review of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) life-history and habitat use in relation to compensation and improvement opportunities. Fisheries management report no. 104. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  47. Miller JA (2011) Effects of water temperature and barium concentration on otolith composition along a salinity gradient: implications for migratory reconstructions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 405:42–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mochnacz NJ, Bajno R, Reist JD, Low G, Babaluk JA (2013) Distribution and biology of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Mackenzie Valley, Northwest Territories, with notes on sympatry with Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma). Arctic 66:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore JS, Loewen TN, Harris LN, Tallman RF (2014) Genetic analysis of sympatric migratory ecotypes of arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus: alternative mating tactics or reproductively isolated strategies? J Fish Biol 84:145–162.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nislow KH, Kynard BE (2009) The role of anadromous sea lamprey in nutrient and material transport between marine and freshwater environments. Am Fish Soc Symp 69:485–494Google Scholar
  51. Northcote T (1997) Potamodromy in salmonidae - living and moving in the fast lane. N Am J Fish Manag 17:1029–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<1029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O'Neill SM, West JE (2009) Marine distribution, life history traits, and the accumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls in Chinook salmon from Puget Sound, Washington. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phillis, CC, Ostrach DJ, Ingram BL, Weber PK (2011) Evaluating otolith Sr/Ca as a tool for reconstructing estuarine habitat use. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 373:360–373.  https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-152
  54. Pickett P (1997) Lower Skagit River Total maximum daily load water quality study. Washington State Department of Ecology, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  55. Power G (2002) Charrs, glaciations and seasonal ice. Environ Biol Fish 64:17–35.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016066519418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quinn TP, Myers KW (2004) Anadromy and the marine migrations of Pacific salmon and trout: Rounsefell revisited. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14:421–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-005-0802-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quinn TP, McGinnity P, Reed TE (2016) The paradox of “premature migration” in anadromous salmonid fishes: patterns and hypotheses. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73:1015–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Quinn TP, Bond MH, Brenkman SJ, Paradis R, Peters RJ (2017) Re-awakening dormant life history variation: stable isotopes indicate anadromy in bull trout following dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington. Environ Biol Fish 100:1659–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
  60. Reist JD, Low G, Johnson JD, McDowell D (2002) Range extension of bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus, to the Central Northwest Territories, with notes on identification and distribution of Dolly Varden, Salvelinus malma, in the Western Canadian arctic. Arctic 55:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reum JCP, Essington TE, Greene CM, Rice CA, Fresh KL (2011) Multiscale influence of climate on estuarine populations of forage fish: the role of coastal upwelling, freshwater flow and temperature. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 425:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rideout RM, Tomkiewicz J (2011) Skipped spawning in fishes: more common than you might think. Marine Coastal Fish 3:176–189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2011.556943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rieman BE, Mclntyre JD (1993) Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of bull trout. General technical report INT-302. Intermountain Research Station, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  64. Rounsefell GA (1958) Anadromy in north American Salmonidae. Fish Bull 58:171–185Google Scholar
  65. Secor DH (1992) Application of otolith microchemistry analysis to investigate anadromy in Chesapeake Bay striped bass Morone saxatilis. Fish Bull 90:798–806Google Scholar
  66. Secor DH (2015) Migration ecology of marine fishes. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  67. Skagit County Public Works (2014) Water Quality Monitoring Program, Mount Vernon www.skagitcounty.net/SCMP
  68. Small MP, Bowman C (2017) Genetic analysis of bull trout collected in Puget Sound for contaminant study. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Molecular Genetics Lab, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  69. Swanberg TR (1997) Movements of and habitat use by fluvial bull trout in the Blackfoot River, Montana. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:735–746.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1997)126<0735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tallman RF, Saurette F, Thera T (1996) Migration and life history variation in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Écoscience 3(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thériault V, Garant D, Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ (2007) Heritability of life-history tactics and genetic correlation with body size in a natural population of brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). J Evol Biol 20:2266–2277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01417.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomas AC, Nelson BW, Lance MM, Deagle BE, Trites AW (2017) Harbour seals target juvenile salmon of conservation concern. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74:907–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson JN, Beauchamp DA (2014) Size-selective mortality of steelhead during freshwater and marine life stages related to freshwater growth in the Skagit River, Washington. Trans Am Fish Soc 143:910–925.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2014.901253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Determination of threatened status for bull trout in coterminous United States. Fed Regist 64:58909:58933Google Scholar
  75. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2015) Recovery plan for the coterminous United States population of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). PortlandGoogle Scholar
  76. Walters AK, Barnes RT, Post DM (2009) Anadromous alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) contribute marine-derived nutrients to coastal stream food webs. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ward RD, Woodwark M, Skibinski DOF (1994) A comparison of genetic diversity levels in marine, freshwater, and anadromous fishes. J Fish Biol 44:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zimmerman M, Kinsel C (2010) Migration of anadromous juvenile bull trout in the Skagit River, 1990–2009. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Program. Science Division, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  79. Zimmerman CE, Reeves GH (2002) Identification of steelhead and resident rainbow trout progeny in the Deschutes River, Oregon, revealed with otolith microchemistry. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:986–993.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.NOAA – National Marine Fisheries ServiceNorthwest Fisheries Science CenterSeattleUSA
  3. 3.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceFish Ecology DivisionOregonUSA
  4. 4.Seattle City LightSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations