Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 96, Issue 8, pp 953–959 | Cite as

Female preference for blue in Japan blue guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

  • Rekha Sathyan
  • Vanessa C. K. CouldridgeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are widely used as a model species in mate choice studies. Although native to South America, guppies have been introduced to natural water bodies in disparate regions of the globe. Here, for the first time, we examine guppies from one such introduced population in Japan where males have evolved a predominantly blue color pattern. Previous studies of wild-type guppies have shown blue to play a relatively minor role in the mate choice decisions of females compared to other traits, such as orange, and the importance of blue is not universally supported by all studies. The Japanese population therefore presents an ideal opportunity to re-examine the potential significance of blue as a mate choice cue in guppies. Mate choice experiments, in which female Japan blue guppies were given a choice between pairs of males that differed in their area of blue coloration but were matched for other traits, revealed that females prefer males with proportionately larger amounts of blue in their color patterns. We discuss possible factors, including sexual and ecological selection, which may have led to the evolution of unusually large areas of blue at the expense of other colors in Japan blue guppies. However, further studies are needed to distinguish between these scenarios.

Keywords

Iridescence Japan blue guppy Mate choice Poecilia reticulata Sexual selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Richard Knight for valuable comments and for providing the fish used in the experiments, as well as two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Alexander HJ, Breden F (2004) Sexual isolation and extreme morphological divergence in the Cumaná guppy: a possible case of incipient speciation. J Evol Biol 17:1238–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archard GA, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC (2009) Light environment and mating behavior in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagnara JT, Fernandez PJ, Fujii R (2007) On the blue coloration of vertebrates. Pigment Cell Res 20:14–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DI (1985) Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:253–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks R, Caithness N (1995) Female choice in a feral guppy population: are there multiple cues? Anim Behav 50:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks R, Endler JA (2001) Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55:1002–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doucet SM (2002) Structural plumage coloration, male body size, and condition in the blue-black grassquit. Condor 104:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doucet SM, Meadows MG (2009) Iridescence: a functional perspective. J R Soc Interface 6:S115–S132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doucet SM, Montgomerie R (2003) Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality. Behav Ecol 14:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doucet SM, Mennill DJ, Hill GE (2007) The evolution of signal design in manakin plumage ornaments. Am Nat 160:S63–S80Google Scholar
  11. Douglas JM, Cronin TW, Chiou TH, Dominy NJ (2007) Light habitats and the role of polarized iridescence in the sensory ecology of neotropical nymphalid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Exp Biol 210:788–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egger B, Klaefiger Y, Theis A, Salzburger W (2011) A sensory bias has triggered the evolution of egg-spots in cichlid fishes. PLoS One 6:e25601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  14. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 9:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Endler JA (1987) Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 35:1376–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 340:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:415–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Endler JA, Houde AE (1995) Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans JP, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (2004) Female mating preferences for colourful males in a population of guppies subject to high predation. J Fish Biol 65:1154–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farr JA (1980) Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae): An experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74:38–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitzstephens DM, Getty T (2000) Colour, fat and social status in male damselflies, Calopteryx maculata. Anim Behav 60:851–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuller RC (2002) Lighting environment predicts relative abundance of male color morphs in bluefin killifish populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godin JGJ, Herdman EJE, Dugatkin LA (2005) Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behavior. Anim Behav 69:999–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill GE, Doucet SM, Buchholz R (2005) The effect of coccidial infection on iridescent plumage coloration in wild turkeys. Anim Behav 69:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houde AE (1987) Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houde AE (1994) Effect of artificial selection on male color patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Houde AE, Endler JA (1990) Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405–1408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karino K, Matsunaga J (2002) Female mate preference is for male total length, not tail length in feral guppies. Behaviour 139:1491–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karino K, Shinjo S (2004) Female mate preference based on male orange spot patterns in the feral guppy Poecilia reticulata in Japan. Ichthyol Res 51:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karino K, Ishiwatari T, Kudo H, Sato A (2011) Female mate preference for a costly ornament in male guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1305–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL (2007) Condition dependence, quantitative genetics, and the potential signal content of iridescent ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Evolution 61:168–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemp DJ, Vukusic P, Rutowski RL (2006) Stress-mediated covariance between nano-structural architecture and ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Funct Ecol 20:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemp DJ, Reznick DN, Grether GF (2008) Ornamental evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata): insights from sensory processing-based analyses of entire colour patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 95:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kemp DJ, Reznick DN, Grether GF, Endler JA (2009) Predicting the direction of ornament evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4335–4343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kodric-Brown A (1985) Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kodric-Brown A (1989) Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kodric-Brown A (1993) Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies: interacting effects of dominance, coloration and courtship. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:415–420Google Scholar
  41. Kodric-Brown A, Johnson SC (2002) Ultraviolet reflectance patterns of male guppies enhance their attractiveness to females. Anim Behav 63:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF (1996) Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lim MLM, Li DQ (2007) Effects of age and feeding history on structure-based UV ornaments of a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 274:569–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Long KD, Houde AE (1989) Orange spots as a visual cue for female mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 82:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Long KD, Rosenqvist G (1998) Changes in male guppy courting distance in response to a fluctuating light environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maan ME, Seehausen O (2011) Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol Lett 14:591–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacLaren RD, Fontaine A (2012) Female preference for male lateral projection area in Poecilia reticulata. Environ Biol Fish 93:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magurran AE (1998) Population differentiation without speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J, Hauber ME (2002) Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J Exp Biol 205:3747–3755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller LK, Brooks R (2005) The effects of genotype, age and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness. Evolution 59:2414–2425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Møller AP, Petrie M (2002) Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompentence in peacocks. Behav Ecol 13:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Price AC, Weadick CJ, Shim J, Rodd FH (2008) Pigments, patterns, and fish behavior. Zebrafish 5:297–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reimchen TE (1989) Loss of nuptial color in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 43:450–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1992) Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B 250:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riesch R, Plath M, Schlupp I (2011) Speciation in caves: experimental evidence that permanent darkness promotes reproductive isolation. Biol Lett 7:909–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenblum EB, Harmon LJ (2010) “Same same but different”: replicated ecological speciation at White Sands. Evolution 65:946–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sobel JM, Chen GF, Watt LR, Schemske DW (2010) The biology of speciation. Evolution 64:295–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tobias JA, Aben J, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP, Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H, Seddon N (2010) Song divergence by sensory drive in Amazonian birds. Evolution 64:2820–2839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Uy JAC, Borgia G (2000) Sexual selection drives rapid divergence in bowerbird display traits. Evolution 54:273–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Walling CA, Royle NJ, Lindström J, Metcalfe NB (2010) Do female association preferences predict the likelihood of reproduction? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biodiversity and Conservation BiologyUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations