Advertisement

Correction to: Climate Change Interactions with Agriculture, Forestry Sequestration, and Food Security

  • Luis Moisés Peña-LévanoEmail author
  • Farzad Taheripour
  • Wallace E. Tyner
Correction
  • 80 Downloads

1 Correction to: Environmental and Resource Economics  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00339-6

This correction stands to correct the original article as the authors have provided the following corrections for Table 2; the corrected values (in billion of USD of welfare) are:
Table 2

Changes in welfare (billions of USD) for the four scenarios

Region

Tax only

Tax subsidy

Tax + CY

TS + CY

ΔCY (4.5)a

CY(BAU)

USA

− 116

− 52

− 125

− 95

− 10

− 20

European Union

− 1

11

− 49

− 162

− 49

− 234

Brazil

− 15

− 10

− 13

− 20

2

− 3

Canada

− 15

− 8

− 15

− 11

0

1

Japan

8

4

3

− 25

− 5

− 38

China

− 194

− 113

− 195

− 189

− 1

− 61

India

− 32

− 30

− 69

− 96

− 37

− 112

Central America

− 53

− 37

− 58

− 85

− 5

− 32

South America

− 19

− 18

− 18

− 31

1

− 5

East Asia

− 13

− 7

− 18

− 25

− 5

− 19

Malaysia and Indonesia

− 16

− 12

− 22

− 29

− 6

− 28

South East Asia

− 14

− 7

− 17

− 14

− 2

− 12

South Asia

− 8

− 6

− 13

− 19

− 4

− 23

Russia

− 61

− 32

− 67

− 56

− 7

− 20

Other Central Europe

− 47

− 26

− 54

− 46

− 8

− 26

Other European countries

− 9

− 8

− 11

− 13

− 1

− 6

Middle East and N. Africa

− 103

− 71

− 115

− 115

− 12

− 53

Sub-Saharan Africa

− 46

− 33

− 50

− 70

− 5

− 35

Oceania

− 6

− 2

− 5

− 4

0

3

Global

− 760

− 457

− 913

− 1107

− 154

− 726

The current table shows the welfare loss for the three main scenarios in $ of EV. Likewise, it shows the benefits and cost of mitigating crop yield losses comparing the additional impact of RCP 4.5 and the decrease in social welfare due to impacts under RCP 8.5

aΔCY (4.5) is calculated as the difference between the Tax and TAX + CY scenarios

  • For Japan—CY(BAU) = − 38 (no − 3B), for South America—TAX + CY = − 18 (no − 1B), for East Asia—TAX + CY = − 18 (no − 1B)

  • For Malaysia and Indonesia—TAX + CY = − 22 (no + 22), for sub-Saharan Africa—TAX + CY = − 50 (no − E0)

The original article has been corrected.

Notes

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of the Food and Resource Economics DepartmentUniversity of FloridaPlant CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations