Searching strategies and reading strategies for English E-journal articles used by EFL graduate students
- 9 Downloads
This study empirically examined the strategies used by English as Foreign Language (EFL) graduate students for searching and reading English e-journal articles (EEJAs). The relationship between EEJA searching strategy (ESS) and EEJA reading strategy (ERS), and the differences among students in terms of their individual characteristics were also examined. Data was collected from 383 graduate students enrolled at 15 various universities using a structured survey questionnaire and then analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis, and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated that ESS was moderately used and ERS was highly used among graduate students. Students’ use of ESS had a positive moderate correlation with ERS. Students with higher usage of ESS were likely to have significantly higher use of ERS. In addition, students aged between 31 and 40, had excellent self-reported reading ability, and spent 3 to 4 hours daily for online reading using more of both ESS and ERS. The results highlighted the need to include ESS and ERS instructions in the curriculum to empower EFL graduate students to be more efficient and effective in their graduate studies. It also provided implications for researchers studying ESS and ERS, differences in using strategies among students with various characteristics, as well as for educators dealing with increasing students’ ESS and ERS usage, thus improving their searching and reading of EEJAs.
KeywordsSearching strategy Reading strategy English as Foreign Language (EFL) E-journal articles, graduate student
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under Grant [MOST 106-2410-H-324-006-].
- Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<646::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borland, H. E., & Pearce, A. (2000). Valuing diversity : Experiences and achievements of NESB students at Victoria University. Melbourne: Centre for Educational Development and Support, Victoria University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 180–195.Google Scholar
- Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph. D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Person Education.Google Scholar
- Chen, H. Y. (2010). Online reading comprehension strategies among fifth- and sixth-grade general and special education students. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(2), 79–109.Google Scholar
- Chen, K. T. (2017). An exploratory study of NNES graduate students’ reading comprehension of English journal articles. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 20–35.Google Scholar
- Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1997). Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: Addressing the needs of ESL/EFL postgraduate students. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 113–140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Hamer, A. B., & McGrath, J. (2010). On-screen vs. on-page reading strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of College Reading and Learning Association, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
- James, K. (1984). The writing of theses by speakers of English as a foreign language: A case study. In R. Williams, J. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies, ELT documents 117 (pp. 99–113). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. Y. (2008). Challenges throughout the process of writing a master’s thesis: The voices of Taiwanese graduate EFL students and their advisors. Unpublished master' s thesis. Providence University. Taichung, Taiwan (ROC).Google Scholar
- McGrath, L., Berggren, J., & Mežek, Š. (2016). Reading EAP: Investigating high proficiency L2 university students' strategy use through reading blogs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.003.
- Mokharti, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.Google Scholar
- Nagar, H., & Salve, M. (2013). Digitization in 21st century-digital library. Research Journal of Library Sciences, 1(1), 20–23.Google Scholar
- Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Reading Study Group.Google Scholar
- Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tenopir, C., Wilson, C. S., Vakkari, P., Talja, S., & King, D. W. (2010). Cross country comparison of scholarly E-Reading patterns in Australia, Finland, and the United States. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 41(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsai, M. J., Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012a). Investigation of high school students' online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9307-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Developing the Information Commitment Survey for assessing college and graduate students’ evaluative standards for Web information and their searching strategies in Web-based learning environments. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, Vancouver, Canada. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/21573.