Advertisement

Searching strategies and reading strategies for English E-journal articles used by EFL graduate students

  • Kate Tzu-Ching ChenEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

This study empirically examined the strategies used by English as Foreign Language (EFL) graduate students for searching and reading English e-journal articles (EEJAs). The relationship between EEJA searching strategy (ESS) and EEJA reading strategy (ERS), and the differences among students in terms of their individual characteristics were also examined. Data was collected from 383 graduate students enrolled at 15 various universities using a structured survey questionnaire and then analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis, and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated that ESS was moderately used and ERS was highly used among graduate students. Students’ use of ESS had a positive moderate correlation with ERS. Students with higher usage of ESS were likely to have significantly higher use of ERS. In addition, students aged between 31 and 40, had excellent self-reported reading ability, and spent 3 to 4 hours daily for online reading using more of both ESS and ERS. The results highlighted the need to include ESS and ERS instructions in the curriculum to empower EFL graduate students to be more efficient and effective in their graduate studies. It also provided implications for researchers studying ESS and ERS, differences in using strategies among students with various characteristics, as well as for educators dealing with increasing students’ ESS and ERS usage, thus improving their searching and reading of EEJAs.

Keywords

Searching strategy Reading strategy English as Foreign Language (EFL) E-journal articles, graduate student 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under Grant [MOST 106-2410-H-324-006-].

References

  1. Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1–33.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1109/47.749366.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646–665.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<646::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borland, H. E., & Pearce, A. (2000). Valuing diversity : Experiences and achievements of NESB students at Victoria University. Melbourne: Centre for Educational Development and Support, Victoria University of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 180–195.Google Scholar
  7. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph. D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Person Education.Google Scholar
  8. Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL Reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553–573.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3586613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casanave, C. P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 33–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(92)90005-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çevik, Y. D. (2015). Predicting college students’ online information searching strategies based on epistemological, motivational, decision-related, and demographic variables. Computers & Education, 90, 54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.002.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, H. Y. (2010). Online reading comprehension strategies among fifth- and sixth-grade general and special education students. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(2), 79–109.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, K. T. (2017). An exploratory study of NNES graduate students’ reading comprehension of English journal articles. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 20–35.Google Scholar
  13. Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1997). Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English: Addressing the needs of ESL/EFL postgraduate students. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 113–140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in Core Reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.2.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamer, A. B., & McGrath, J. (2010). On-screen vs. on-page reading strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of College Reading and Learning Association, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
  17. Holman, L. (2011). Millennial Students' mental models of search: Implications for academic librarians and database developers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(1), 19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, H.-C., Chern, C.-L., & Lin, C.-C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James, K. (1984). The writing of theses by speakers of English as a foreign language: A case study. In R. Williams, J. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies, ELT documents 117 (pp. 99–113). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kaur, A. (2012). Academics' attitudes towards use of electronic journals: A case study of Punjab and Chandigarh. The International Information & Library Review, 44(4), 182–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2012.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lau, K. l., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, H. Y. (2008). Challenges throughout the process of writing a master’s thesis: The voices of Taiwanese graduate EFL students and their advisors. Unpublished master' s thesis. Providence University. Taichung, Taiwan (ROC).Google Scholar
  23. Lee, M.-L. (2012). A study of the selection of Reading strategies among genders by EFL college students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 310–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37(4), 640–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGrath, L., Berggren, J., & Mežek, Š. (2016). Reading EAP: Investigating high proficiency L2 university students' strategy use through reading blogs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 152–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.003.
  26. Mokharti, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.Google Scholar
  27. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagar, H., & Salve, M. (2013). Digitization in 21st century-digital library. Research Journal of Library Sciences, 1(1), 20–23.Google Scholar
  29. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
  30. Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 125–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, H.-R., & Kim, D. (2011). Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2156–2166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Park, H.-R., & Kim, D. (2017). English language learners’ strategies for reading online texts: Influential factors and patterns of use at home and in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53, 649–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2003). Gender differences in patterns of searching the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 335–348.  https://doi.org/10.2190/7br8-vxa0-07a7-8avn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sitko, M., Tafuri, N., Szczyrbak, G., & Park, T. (2002). E-journal management systems: Trends, trials, and trade-offs. Serials Review, 28(3), 176–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-7913(02)00193-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Reading Study Group.Google Scholar
  39. Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Subramanyam, R. V. (2013). Art of reading a journal article: Methodically and effectively. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: JOMFP, 17(1), 65–70.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.110733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tenopir, C., Wilson, C. S., Vakkari, P., Talja, S., & King, D. W. (2010). Cross country comparison of scholarly E-Reading patterns in Australia, Finland, and the United States. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 41(1), 26–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsai, M. J. (2009). Online information searching strategy inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53(2), 473–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsai, M. J., Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012a). Investigation of high school students' online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9307-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., Hou, H. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2012b). University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 881–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Developing the Information Commitment Survey for assessing college and graduate students’ evaluative standards for Web information and their searching strategies in Web-based learning environments. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005, Vancouver, Canada. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/21573.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied EnglishChaoyang University of TechnologyTaichung CityTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations