Advertisement

Preservice ICT teachers’ technology metaphors in the margin of technological determinism

  • Salih BardakciEmail author
  • Tuğba Kocadağ Ünver
Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Many factors might influence the current place and the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in social quarters, including education. One such factor might become one’s conceptions of technology. From this point of view, the purpose of this study is to examine preservice ICT teachers’ technology metaphors by linking to concepts of technological determinism. The study was carried out in a qualitative pattern. The data were gathered through metaphor elicitation prompt from 55 preservice ICT teachers, and content analysis was applied over the data. The findings of the study revealed that technology is widely being regarded in a utopian and improved state of affairs way of approach. Revealing preservice ICT teachers technology metaphors might enable scholars to broaden more realistic perspectives regarding how technology might be integrated within educational praxis. Furthermore, such an awareness might enable a realization of what to expect from technology, both for students and teachers.

Keywords

Preservice ICT teachers Technology metaphors Technological determinism Metaphor analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & Management, 44(8), 681–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badham, R. J. (1986). Technology and public choice: Strategies for technological control and the selection of technologies. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 4(2), 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagchi, K., Hart, P., & Peterson, M. F. (2004). National culture and information technology product adoption. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 7(4), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baytun, İ. D., & Özerem, A. (2012). Education in the grip of technological determinism concept. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 1(4), 45–53.Google Scholar
  6. Bimber, B. (1990). Karl Marx and the three faces of technological determinism. Social Studies of Science, 20(2), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdon, J. (2018). The case for the technological comparison in communication history. Communication Theory, 28(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buras, K. L., & Apple, M. W. (2008). Radical disenchantments: Neoconservatives and the disciplining of desire in an anti-utopian era. Comparative Education, 44(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canpolat, E. (2012). A moment on technological determinism: Computopia. Akdeniz İletişim, 17(2012), 43–62.Google Scholar
  10. Çelik, E. E. (2018). Positivism as a dis/utopia and alternative scientific approaches. DTCF Journal, 58(2), 1609–1627.Google Scholar
  11. Chandler, D. (1995). Technological or media determinism. Retrieved July, 16, 2013 from http://www.waena.org/ktm/week1/TechorMediaDeterminism.pdf.
  12. Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E95–E99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Employing augmented-reality-embedded instruction to disperse the imparities of individual differences in earth science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chu, T. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016). With good we become good: Understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Ustunel, H., & Aydın, M. K. (2014). Effects of a haptic augmented simulation on K-12 students’ achievement and their attitudes towards physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 565–574.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. (2012). Introduction: Digital technologies in the lives of young people. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(2), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corazza, L. (2008). ICT and intercultural opportunities offered by the web. Encyclopedia of Information and Communication Technology (pp. 1–10). Italy: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  19. Czitrom, D. J. (1982). Media and the American mind: From Morse to McLuhan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40–48.Google Scholar
  23. Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fleck, J., & Howells, J. (2001). Technology, the technology complex and the paradox of technological determinism. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(4), 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox, S. (2018). Cyborgs, robots and society: Implications for the future of society from human enhancement with in-the-body technologies. Technologies, 6(2), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Garrett, B. M., Jackson, C., & Wilson, B. (2015). Augmented reality m-learning to enhance nursing skills acquisition in the clinical skills laboratory. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(4), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Göğüş, A., Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2012). Educational technology acceptance across cultures: A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in the context of Turkish national culture. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 394–408.Google Scholar
  29. Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78–80.Google Scholar
  30. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpin, D. (1999). Utopian realism and a new politics of education: Developing a critical theory without guarantees. Journal of Education Policy, 14(4), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. J. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hannah, M. (2018). Transhumanism: Evolutionary futurism and the human Technologies of Utopia by Andrew Pilsch. Modernism/modernity, 25(1), 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heffernan, M. (2011). Willful blindness: Why we ignore the obvious at our peril. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  35. Heilbroner, R. L. (1967). Do machines make history? Technology and Culture, 8(3), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGrew Hill, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, D., & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  40. Kabakçı, I., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2004). Using the technology and being a technorealist. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2004), 19–28.Google Scholar
  41. Kerr, D., Axelrod, C., Hoppe, C., & Klonoff, D. C. (2018). Diabetes and technology in 2030: A utopian or dystopian future? Diabetic Medicine, 35(4), 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Epistemology or pedagogy, that is the question. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 144–157). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Cambridge: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, T. (2007). Pedagogies from no-where, a review of Edutopias: New utopian thinking in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(2), 216–220.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta. Extracted on December, 25, 2016 from: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/decoding-learning.
  48. Maher, D. (2011). Using the multimodal affordances of the interactive whiteboard to support students’ understanding of texts. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(3), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2010). Presentation of mediation: Is there a need for ‘interactive whiteboard technology-proficient’ teachers in secondary mathematics? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moylan, T. (2018). Scraps of the untainted sky: Science fiction, utopia, dystopia. Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neuman, W. R. (1991). The future of the mass audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Nistor, N., Göğüş, A., & Lerche, T. (2013). Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: A European study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 733–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nyman, E., & Teten, R. L. (2018). Lost and found and lost again: Island utopias and dystopias in the BioShock series. Games and Culture, 13(4), 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Papastephanou, M. (2008). Dystopian reality, utopian thought and educational practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2–3), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Papert, S. (1997). Why school reform is impossible. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 6(4), 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pérez-López, D., & Contero, M. (2013). Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: A case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 19–28.Google Scholar
  60. Poore, M. (2011). Digital literacy: Human flourishing and collective intelligence in a knowledge society. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 20.Google Scholar
  61. Robinson, L. K. (2007). Diffusion of educational technology and educational reform: Examining perceptual barriers to technology integration. In L. Tomei (Edt.), Integrating information & communications technologies into the classroom. (pp. 272-288). Hershey, London, Melbourne, Singapore: Information Science Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Roper, V. (2018). Blogs as a teaching tool and method of public legal education: A case study. International Journal of Public Legal Education, 2(1), 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Russo, F. (2018). Digital technologies, ethical questions, and the need of an informational framework. Philosophy & Technology, 1-13,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0326-2.
  64. Schussler, D. L., Poole, I. R., Whitlock, T. W., & Evertson, C. M. (2007). Layers and links: Learning to juggle ‘one more thing’ in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 572–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Selwyn, N. (2012a). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Selwyn, N. (2012b). School 2.0: Rethinking the future of schools in the digital age. In Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 3-16). Springer New York.Google Scholar
  67. Selwyn, N. (2016a). Is technology good for education? Cambridge: Polity press.Google Scholar
  68. Selwyn, N. (2016b). Teachers vs. technology: Rethinking the digitisation of teachers’ work. Professional Voice: Teaching in Context, 11(2), 18–24.Google Scholar
  69. Staley, D. J. (2018). Teaching the future of Technology in the History Classroom: A case study. World Futures Review, 10(4), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sun, Y., Liu, L., Peng, X., Dong, Y., & Barnes, S. J. (2014). Understanding Chinese users’ continuance intention toward online social networks: An integrative theoretical model. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Surry, D. W., & Farquhar, J. D. (1997). Diffusion theory and instructional technology. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/vol2no1/article2.htm. Accessed 16 Jul 2013.
  72. Tanner, P., Karas, C., & Schofield, D. (2014). Augmenting a child’s reality: Using educational tablet technology. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13, 45–54.Google Scholar
  73. Thornton, T., Ernst, J. V., & Clark, A. C. (2012). Augmented reality as a visual and spatial learning tool in technology education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 18–21.Google Scholar
  74. Thurm, C. (1999). Technology integration in Alberta schools - a review of policy and practice: Reliance on technology undermines support for teachers (unpublished master thesis). Carleton University, school of journalism and communication. Ottawa. Google Scholar
  75. Topu, F. B., & Göktaş, Y. (2012). ICT teachers’ assigned roles and expectations from them. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 473–478.Google Scholar
  76. Tufekci, Z. (2016). Zeynep Tufekci: Machine intelligence makes human morals more important [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/zeynep_tufekci_machine_intelligence_makes_human_morals_more_important#t-969911.
  77. Türel, Y. K. (2012). Teachers’ negative attitudes towards interactive whiteboard use: Needs and problems. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 423–439.Google Scholar
  78. Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vural, Z. B. A., & Bakır, U. (2007). Information and communication technologies from the dystopian perspective and the future of the humanity. Journal of Selcuk Communication, 5(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  80. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Wagner, D., Day, B., James, T., Kozma, R. B., Miller, J., & Unwin, T. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: A handbook for developing countries. Washington DC: INFODEV.Google Scholar
  82. Williams, D. (2003). The video game lightning rod. Information, Communication & Society, 6(4), 523–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Woodson, A. (2017). ‘Being black is like being a soldier in Iraq’: Metaphorical expressions of blackness in an urban community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., & Montero, A. (2013). An augmented lecture feedback system to support learner and teacher communication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Computer Education & Instructional TechnologyTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityTokatTurkey

Personalised recommendations