Advertisement

Modeling the effect of new media literacy levels and social media usage status on problematic internet usage behaviours among high school students

  • Hatice Yildiz DurakEmail author
  • Mustafa Saritepeci
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

There has been a considerable increase in problematic internet usage among high school students due to the fact that our daily lives are considerably being occupied by internet. It is therefore important to investigate into the variables considered as effective in problematic internet use of this group. This paper seeks to address whether there are relations between problematic internet use and social media usage status as well as purpose of social media usage and new media literacy. A total of 155 ninth grade students studying in high school affiliated to Turkey Ministry of National Education were recruited in this study. The relational screening research design from descriptive research methods was adopted in this paper. Personal information form and three data collection instruments were employed in this study. The data obtained in the research were analyzed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model based on the research design. According to the results of partial least squares structural equation model, the relative importance order of the variables examined in the study can be posed as: “social media usage status, social media usage purposes and new media literacy”.

Keywords

Problematic internet usage New media Social media usage New media literacy, high school students 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author Hatice Yildiz Durak managed the literature searches and classification of the articles following the eligibility criteria. Author Mustafa Saritepeci managed the data collection process. Authors Hatice Yıldız Durak and Mustafa Saritepeci participated in the study design and in writing the protocol to be performed and undertook the statistical analysis. Author Hatice Yildiz Durak managed in the interpretation of the results and analyses, and in writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript. In this article, we declare that all authors contribute equally.

References

  1. Aboujaoude, E., Koran, L. M., Gamel, N., Large, M. D., & Serpe, R. T. (2012). Potential markers for problematic internet use: A telephone survey of 2,513 adults. CNS Spectrums, 11(10), 750–755.Google Scholar
  2. Altundag, Y., & Bulut, S. (2016). Investigation of elementary school teacher candidates’ problematic Internet usage in terms of some variables. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287–293.Google Scholar
  4. Ata, E. E., Akpinar, S., & Kelleci, M. (2011). The relationship between students problematic internet usage and their anger expression manner. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 10(4), 473–480.Google Scholar
  5. Balta, Ö. Ç., & Horzum, M. B. (2008). The factors that affect internet addiction of students in a web based learning environment. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 41(1), 187–205.Google Scholar
  6. Beranuy, M., Oberst, U., Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182–1187.Google Scholar
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research pattern spss applications and ınterpretation (9th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553–575.Google Scholar
  9. Caplan, S. E. (2006). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 234–242.Google Scholar
  10. Carbonell, X., Oberst, U., & Beranuy, M. (2013). The cell phone in the twenty-first century: A risk for addiction or a necessary tool? In Principles of addiction, 901–909.Google Scholar
  11. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho Vinuesa, T. (2013). The internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149–159.Google Scholar
  12. Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-López, E. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 476–484.Google Scholar
  13. Ceyhan, A. A., & Ceyhan, E. (2014). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet and problematic internet use behavior. Journal of Addiction, 15(2), 56–64.Google Scholar
  14. Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A. A., & Gürcan, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the problematic internet usage scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 387–416.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, D.-T., Wu, J., & Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84–88.Google Scholar
  16. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.Google Scholar
  17. Chiu, S.-I., Hong, F.-Y., & Chiu, S.-L. (2013). An analysis on the correlation and gender difference between college students’ internet addiction and mobile phone addiction in Taiwan. ISRN Addiction, 2013, 110.Google Scholar
  18. Chou, T. J., & Ting, C. C. (2003). The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 663–675.Google Scholar
  19. Çetin, A. B., & Ceyhan, A. (2014). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet and problematic internet use behavior. TheTurkish Journal on Addictions, 1(2), 30–46.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187–195.Google Scholar
  21. Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2018). Factors associated with smartphone use and addiction among middle school students. Journal of Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. Filiz, O., Osman, E., Dönmez, F. İ., & Kurt, A. A. (2014). Examination of the correlation between aims of social network sites usage and internet addiction of computer and instructional technology department students [in Turkish]. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 3(2).Google Scholar
  23. Fioravanti, G., Dèttore, D., & Casale, S. (2012). Adolescent internet addiction: Testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of internet attributes, and preference for online social interactions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(6), 318–323.Google Scholar
  24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.Google Scholar
  25. Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F. I., & Calvete, E. (2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1581–1591.Google Scholar
  26. Ghassemzadeh, L., Shahraray, M., & Moradi, A. (2008). Prevalence of internet addiction and comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 731–733.Google Scholar
  27. Gökçearslan, Ş., & Günbatar, M. S. (2012). Internet addiction in high school students. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 2(2), 10–24.Google Scholar
  28. Gökçearslan, Ş., Mumcu, F. K., Haşlaman, T., & Çevik, Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 639–649.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, M., & Behavior. (2000). Does internet and computer" addiction" exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 211–218.Google Scholar
  30. Gümüş, A. B., Şıpkın, S., Tuna, A., & Keskin, G. (2015). The relationship between problematic internet use, violence trend and some demographic variables among university students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 14(6), 460–467.Google Scholar
  31. Hara, N., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2016). Co-constructing controversy: Content analysis of collaborative knowledge negotiation in online communities. Information, Communication & Society, 19(11), 1587–1604.Google Scholar
  32. Held, C., & Cress, U. (2009, September). Learning by foraging: The impact of social tags on knowledge acquisition. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 254–266). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Ifinedo, P. (2011). Internet/e-business technologies acceptance in Canada's SMEs: An exploratory investigation. Internet Research, 21(3), 255–281.Google Scholar
  34. Jang, S. M., Mckeever, B. W., Mckeever, R., & Kim, J. K. (2017). From social media to mainstream news: The information flow of the vaccine-autism controversy in the US, Canada, and the UK. Health communication, 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Karal, H., & Kokoç, M. (2010). University students’ aims of use of social network sites scale: Development and validation [in Turkish]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 251–263.Google Scholar
  36. Karaman, M. K., & Karataş, A. (2009). Media literacy levels of the candidate teachers. Elementary Education Online, 8(3).Google Scholar
  37. Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. King, A. L., Valenca, A. M., & Nardi, A. E. (2010). Nomophobia: The mobile phone in panic disorder with agoraphobia:Reducing phobias or worsening of dependence? Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 23, 52–54.Google Scholar
  39. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Zwaans, T., & Kaptsis, D. (2013). Clinical features and axis I comorbidity of Australian adolescent pathological Internet and video game users. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(11), 1058–1067.Google Scholar
  40. Kircaburun, K., Demetrovics, Z., & Tosuntaş, Ş. B. (2018). Analyzing the links between problematic social media use, dark triad traits, and self-esteem. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. Kittinger, R., Correia, C. J., & Irons, J. G. (2012). Relationship between Facebook use and problematic internet use among college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(6), 324–327.Google Scholar
  42. Koc, M., & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of new media literacy scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834–843.Google Scholar
  43. Koronczai, B., Kökönyei, G., Urbán, R., Kun, B., Pápay, O., Nagygyörgy, K., et al. (2013). The mediating effect of self-esteem, depression and anxiety between satisfaction with body appearance and problematic internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39(4), 259–265.Google Scholar
  44. Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. (2012). The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media & Society, 14(1), 117–136.Google Scholar
  45. Lin, T.-B., Li, J.-Y., Deng, F., & Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4).Google Scholar
  46. Maloney, E. (2007). What web 2.0 can teach us about learning? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18) January 5th, p. B 26. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/article/What-Web-20-Can-Teach-Us/8332.
  47. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Retrieved from https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fea_pub/2050/
  48. Mei, S., Yau, Y. H., Chai, J., Guo, J., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Problematic internet use, well-being, self-esteem and self-control: Data from a high-school survey in China. Addictive Behaviors, 61, 74–79.Google Scholar
  49. Nunnally, J. (1978). C.(1978). Psychometric. theory, 2.Google Scholar
  50. Odacı, H., & Çıkrıkçı, Ö. (2014). Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 61–66.Google Scholar
  51. Perrin, A. (2015). Social media usage. Pew research center, 52–68.Google Scholar
  52. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.Google Scholar
  53. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. In Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH http://www.smartpls.com.Google Scholar
  54. Sarıtepeci, M., Durak, H., & Durak, A. (2017). Investigation Of Problematic Internet Usage Of Teacher Candidates In The View Of Social Media Usage Habits [In Turkish]. In Paper presented at the International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium (ICITS-2017). Malatya: İnönü University.Google Scholar
  55. Schimmenti, A., Passanisi, A., Gervasi, A. M., Manzella, S., & Famà, F. I. (2014). Insecure attachment attitudes in the onset of problematic internet use among late adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 45(5), 588–595.Google Scholar
  56. Seferoğlu, S. S., & Yıldız, H. (2013). Children of the Digital Age: A research on primary school students' Facebook uses and internet addictions [Dijital çağın çocukları: İlköğretim öğrencilerinin Facebook kullanımları ve internet bağımlılıkları üzerine bir araştırma]. İletişim ve Diplomasi, 2, 31–48.Google Scholar
  57. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83–94.Google Scholar
  58. Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E., Jr., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57(1–3), 267–272.Google Scholar
  59. Sırakaya, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2013). Investigation of problematic internet usage of teacher candidates. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(28-1).Google Scholar
  60. Spada, M. M. (2014). An overview of problematic internet use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  61. Tahiroglu, A. Y., Celik, G. G., Fettahoglu, C., Yildirim, V., Toros, F., Avci, A., et al. (2010). Problematic internet use in the psychiatric sample compared community sample. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 47(3), 241–247.Google Scholar
  62. Tambuscio, M., Ruffo, G., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2015, May). Fact-checking effect on viral hoaxes: A model of misinformation spread in social networks. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 977–982). ACM.Google Scholar
  63. Tella, A. (2007). University of Botswana undergraduates uses of internet: Implications on academic performance. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences., 45(2), 161–185.Google Scholar
  64. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). (2018). Labour Force Statistics, March 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/HbPrint.do?id=27694 (15 Oct. 2018).
  65. Van Rooij, A. J., Schoenmakers, T. M., Vermulst, A. A., Van Den Eijnden, R. J., & Van De Mheen, D. (2011). Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers. Addiction, 106(1), 205–212.Google Scholar
  66. Wang, H., Zhou, X., Lu, C., Wu, J., Deng, X., & Hong, L. (2011a). Problematic internet use in high school students in Guangdong Province, China. PLoS One, 6(5), e19660.Google Scholar
  67. Wang, Q., Chen, W., & Liang, Y. (2011b). The effects of social media on college students. MBA STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP.Google Scholar
  68. Wu, S., & Chen, S. (2007). Media literacy education. Taipei, Taiwan: Chiuliu.Google Scholar
  69. Yang, S. C., & Tung, C.-J. (2007). Comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 79–96.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  70. Yau, Y. H., Potenza, M. N., & White, M. A. (2012). Problematic internet use, mental health and impulse control in an online survey of adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 72–81.Google Scholar
  71. Yellowlees, P. M., & Marks, S. (2007). Problematic internet use or internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1447–1453.Google Scholar
  72. Young, K. (2009). Internet addiction: Diagnosis and treatment considerations. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 39(4), 241–246.Google Scholar
  73. Young, K. S. (2011). Clinical assessment of internet-addicted clients. In K. S. Young & C. N. de Abreu (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 19-34). Hoboken.Google Scholar
  74. Yildiz-Durak, H. (2018a). Modeling of variables related to problematic internet usage and problematic social media usage in adolescents. Current Psychology, 1–13.Google Scholar
  75. Yildiz-Durak, H. (2018b). Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: Demographic variables and academic performance. The Social Science Journal.Google Scholar
  76. Yildiz-Durak, H. (2018c). What would you do without your smartphone? Adolescents’ social media usage, locus of control, and loneliness as a predictor of nomophobia. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  77. Yildiz-Durak, H., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Yilmaz, R., & Ozturk, H. T. (2017, June). Examining pre-service teachers’ media literacy level with some variables. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 187–197). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  78. Zorbaz, O. (2013). Analysis of problematic internet use of high school students in terms of social anxiety and peer relations. (Master thesis) Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.Google Scholar
  79. Zorbaz, O., & Dost, M. T. (2014). Examination of problematic Internet use of high school student in terms of gender, social anxiety and peer relations. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29(1), 298–310.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education, Department of Computer Education and Instructional TechnologyBartin UniversityBartinTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Department of Computer Education and Instructional TechnologyNecmettin Erbakan UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations