Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 693–709 | Cite as

The role of DAISY digital talking books in the education of individuals with blindness: A pilot study

  • Vassilios ArgyropoulosEmail author
  • Afroditi Paveli
  • Magda Nikolaraizi


The present study is characterized as pilot and investigates the impact that different aural renderings have on blind individuals’ comprehension. In specific, the present research attempts to compare the effective or active listening of participants with blindness when they use different media; that is, digital talking scripts through synthetic speech and DAISY standard respectively. Five participants with blindness were invited to listen to matched scripts through DAISY technology and screen reader software respectively. The results revealed significant differences in participants’ comprehension when they listened to digital talking scripts through DAISY standard and screen reader software. The participants applied more complex navigational routes and their responses towards comprehension questions were more correctly when the scripts were rendered through DAISY technology rather than through screen reader software. It is argued that DAISY technology could prove to be vital aid in blind individuals’ schooling and workplace. Finally, the results from this study support that further research has to be done especially on qualitative basis in order to document the parameters of the impact that aural technology, such as DAISY technology, have on blind students’ understanding and development of their literacy skills.


Vision impairment Blindness DAISY technology Assistive technology Screen readers Digital talking books 



  1. Ahmed, F., Borodin, Y., Puzis, Y., & Ramakrishnan, I. V. (2012). Why read if you can skim: Towards enabling faster screen reading. In In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 39. Lyon: France.Google Scholar
  2. Argyropoulos, V., & Chamonikolaou, S. (2016). Investigating key functions of hand movements by individuals with visual impairment: Improving instructional practices in special education through research. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 6(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyropoulos, V., Nikolaraizi, M., Tsiakali, T., Kountrias, P., Koutsogiorgou, S., & Martos, A. (2014). Collaborative action research approach promoting professional development for teachers of students with visual impairment in assistive technology. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 17(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyropoulos, V., Sideridis, G., Martos, A., & Nikolaraizi, M. (2015). Auditory Access and distinction of visual document elements by blind and sighted students. In M. Carmo (Ed.). Proceedings of International Conference “Education and New Developments” (pp. 214–218). Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  5. Ashok, V., Borodin, Y., Stoyanchev, S., & Ramakrishnan, I. V. (2014). Dialogue act modeling for non-visual web access. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2014 Conference (pp. 123–132). Philadelphia: U.S.A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashok, V., Puzis, Y., Borodin, Y., & Ramakrishnan, I. V. (2017). Web Screen Reading Automation Assistance Using Semantic Abstraction. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM IUI 17 (pp. 407–418), Limassol, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, E. V. (1996). Teaching visually impaired children (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  8. Brady-Myerov, M. (2015). Teaching Listening Skills: Ready to Listen, Ready to Learn. Edudemic Retrieved from
  9. Cain, M. H., & Merrill, Z. (2001). Distance education for Master’s students with visual impairments: Technology and support. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 572–575.Google Scholar
  10. Chaisanit, S. (2012). DAISY Technology and print disabled. International Journal of Soft Computing, 7, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaisanit, S., & Suksakulchai, S. (2011). The online participatory DAISY talking book production system (OPDAISYS): A shared information and knowledge system for print disabled students. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlander, T. (2005). Digital distribution of DAISY talking books in Sweden. International Congress Series, 1282, 826–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutoit, T. (1997). An introduction to text-to-speech synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Edmonds, C. J., & Pring, L. (2006). Generating inferences from written and spoken language. A comparison of children with visual impairment and children with sight. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(2), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferris, D. (2016). Techniques and Challenges in Speech Synthesis. Retrieved from
  16. Gerber, E. (2003). The benefits of and barriers to computer use for individuals who are visually blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 536–550.Google Scholar
  17. Grajcevci, A., & Shala, A. (2016). Formal and non-formal education in the new era. Action Researcher in Education, 7, 119–130.Google Scholar
  18. Guerette, A. R. (2014). Compensatory access. In C. B. Allman, S. Lewis, & S. J. Spungin (Eds.), ECC essentials. Teaching the Expanded Core Curriculum to Students with Visual Impairments (pp. 61–103). New York: AFB Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guettal, I. (2008). Introducing Storytelling Activities as a Basic Technique to Develop Students’ Oral Performance. An Experimental Approach Case Study: Second Year Students of English at Batna University. Masters thesis, University Mohamed Khider. Retrieved from
  20. Hatlen, P., & Spungin, S. J. (2008). The nature and future of literacy: Point and counterpoint. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(7), 389–396.Google Scholar
  21. Heller, M. A. (2006). Introduction: Approaches to touch and blindness. In M. A. Heller & S. B. allesteros (Eds.), Touch and blindness. Pscychology and neuroscience (pp. 1–9). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Hogan, T., Adlof, S., & Alonzo, C. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huebner, K. M. (2000). Visual Impairment. In M. C. Holbrook & A. J. Koening (Eds.), Foundations of Education Vol. I, (pp.55–76). AFB Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kahlisch, T. (2008). DAISY: An opportunity to improve access to information for all. Information Services & Use, 28(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapperman, G., & Sticken, J. (2000). Assistive technology. In A. J. Koenig & M. C. Holbrook (Eds.), Foundations of education (Vol. II: Instructional Strategies for Teaching Children and Youths with Visual Impairments, pp. 500–516). USA: AFB Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kerscher, G. (2001). Daisy consortium: Information technology for the world's blind and print-disabled population-past, present, and into the future. Information Technology & Disabilities, 19(1), 11–15.Google Scholar
  27. Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook, M. C. (2000). Literacy Skills. In A. J. Koenig & M. C. Holbrook (Eds.), Foundations of Education Vol. II. Instructional Strategies for Teaching Children and Youths with Visual Impairments, (pp. 264–312). AFB Press.Google Scholar
  28. Maćkowski, M. S., Brzoza, P. F., & Spinczyk, D. R. (2018). Tutoring math platform accessible for visually impaired people. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 95, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Male, M. (2003). Technology for Inclusion: Meeting the Special Needs of All Students (4thed.). USA: Pearson Education Group.Google Scholar
  30. Nadig, A. (2013). Listening comprehension. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism Spectrum disorders. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Papadopoulos, K., Argyropoulos, V., & Kouroupetroglou, G. (2008). Discrimination, perception and comprehension of synthetic speech by students with visual impairments: The case of similar acoustic patterns. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 102(7), 420–429.Google Scholar
  32. Papadopoulos, K., Katemidou, E., Koutsoklenis, A., & Mouratidou, E. (2010). Differences amongst sighted individuals and individuals with visual impairments in word intelligibility presented via synthetic and natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(4), 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peters, T., & Bell, L. (2007). Choosing and using text-to-speech software. Computers in Libraries, 27(2), 26–29.Google Scholar
  34. Postello, T., & Barclay, L. A. (2012). Elementary school: Developing and refining listening skills. In L. A. Barclay (Ed.), Learning to listen, listening to learn: Teaching listening skills to students with visual impairments (pp. 104–152). New York: AFB Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, D., & Dalton, B. (2006). Plato revisited: Learning through listening in the digital world. National Center on universal design for. Learning Retrieved from
  36. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning, Contemporary. Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
  37. Southwell, K. L., & Slater, J. (2013). An evaluation on finding aid accessibility for screen readers. Information Technology and Libraries, 32(3), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spooner, S. (2014). What page, miss? Enhancing text accessibility with DAISY (digital accessible information system). Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 108(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spungin, S. J., Ferrell, K. A., & Monson, M. (2017). The role and function of the teacher of students with visual impairments. In Position paper of the division on visual impairments, Council for Exceptional Children. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  40. Stein, V., Neßelrath, R., Alexandersson, J., & Tröger, J. (2011). Designing with and for the visually impaired: Vocabulary, spelling and the screen reader. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education, volume 2. Netherlands: SciTePress.Google Scholar
  41. Tank, E., & Frederiksen, C. (2007). The DAISY standard: Entering the global virtual library. Library Trends, 55(4), 932–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tazawa, N., Totihara, S., Iwahana, Y., Imai, A., Seiyama, N., & Takagi, T. (2010). Rapid listening of DAISY digital talking books by speech - rate conversion technology for people with visual impairments. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. L. Zagler, & A. I. Karshmer (Eds.), Proceedings of computers helping people with special needs 12th international conference, ICCHP (pp. 62–68). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuncer, A. T., & Altunay, B. (2006). The effect of a summarization-based cumulative retelling strategy on listening comprehension of college students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 100(6), 79–84.Google Scholar
  44. Vargas-Colon, K., & Villasenor, R. (2012). Using auditory stimulation with students and Lavelle School for the blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(9), 564–567.Google Scholar
  45. World Health Organization International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (2003). 10th revision, Chapter VII H54 Blindness and low vision. Retrieved June 15 2018 from
  46. Wolfson, G. (2008). Using audiobooks to meet the needs of adolescent readers. American Secondary Education, 36(2), 105–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vassilios Argyropoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Afroditi Paveli
    • 1
  • Magda Nikolaraizi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations