Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 489–508 | Cite as

Perceived impact of BYOD initiatives on post-secondary students’ learning, behaviour and wellbeing: the perspective of educators in Greece

  • Christos LivasEmail author
  • Ioannis Katsanakis
  • Eleni Vayia


The pervasiveness of digital devices in almost every facet of student and faculty life leads to the integration of technology in teaching and learning practices of contemporary educational institutions. As an alternative strategy of technology integration, “Bring Your Own Device” involves the introduction of personal digital devices in numerous educational activities and transforms students’ learning experiences, behavioural responses and aspects of wellbeing. Due to the crucial role of tutors in the implementation of educational strategy, the present study examined the perceptions of 207 educators teaching in 9 post-secondary educational institutions in Greece with respect to the potential effects of “Bring your Own Device” on students’ learning, behaviour and wellbeing. Overall, the findings reveal that educators recognize the positive impact of “Bring your Own Device” initiatives on students’ learning, but demonstrate low agreement with the potential negative effects on students’ behaviour and wellbeing. Their perceptions are shaped, to a great extent, by individual characteristics and circumstances faced such as gender, familiarity with new technology, prior knowledge of “Bring you Own Device” and educational level in which they are teaching.


Bring your own device Post-secondary education Educational strategy Learning 


Authors’ contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to this study, have approved the manuscript and agree with submission to “Education and Information Technologies”.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abachi, H. R., & Muhammad, G. (2014). Τhe impact of m-learning technology on students and educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 491–496. Scholar
  2. Adams, S. K., & Kisler, T. S. (2013). Sleep quality as a mediator between technology-related sleep quality, depression, and anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 25–30. Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. Scholar
  4. Al-Okaily, R. (2013). Mobile learning and BYOD: Implementations in an intensive English program. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 1–17 Scholar
  5. Attewell, J. (2015). BYOD Bring Your Own Device: A guide for school leaders. Brussels: European Schoolnet’s Interactive Classroom Working Group.Google Scholar
  6. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. Scholar
  7. Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17–32.Google Scholar
  8. Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43 Scholar
  9. Bergner, R. M. (2011). What is behavior? And so what? New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 147–155. Scholar
  10. Blayone, T., vanOostveen, R., Barber, W., DiGiuseppe, M., & Childs, E. (2017). Democratizing digital learning: Theorizing the fully online learning community model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 13. Scholar
  11. Burden, K. J., & Kearney, M. (2017). Investigating and critiquing teacher educators’ mobile learning practices. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 110–125. Scholar
  12. Burns-Sardone, N. (2014). Making the case for BYOD instruction in teacher education. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11(1), 192–200. Scholar
  13. Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2), 141–158. Scholar
  14. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 385–401.
  15. Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297. Scholar
  16. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2013). Academic achievement in BYOD classrooms. QScience Proceedings, (12th world conference on mobile and contextual learning [mLearn 2013), 15.Google Scholar
  20. Demirci, K., Akgönül, M., & Akpinar, A. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 85–92. Scholar
  21. Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235.Google Scholar
  22. El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12–21.Google Scholar
  23. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. Scholar
  24. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. Scholar
  26. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53. Scholar
  27. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826. Scholar
  29. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Henderson, R. G., & Chapman, B. F. (2012). Business educators’ perceptions concerning mobile learning. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, LIV(1), 16–27.Google Scholar
  31. Hockly, N. (2012). Tech-savvy teaching: BYOD. Modern English Teacher, 21(4), 44–45.Google Scholar
  32. Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. Scholar
  33. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London: Sage.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525–534. Scholar
  35. Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher Education Edition. Texas: The New Media Consortium. Austin.Google Scholar
  36. Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(1), 11–17. Scholar
  37. King, J., Bond, T., & Blandford, S. (2002). An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 69–84. Scholar
  38. Kong, S. C., & Song, Y. (2015). An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD for reflective engagement in higher education. Computers & Education, 88, 227–240. Scholar
  39. Lachman, S. J. (1997). Learning is a process: Toward an improved definition of learning. The Journal of Psychology, 131(5), 477–480. Scholar
  40. Lee, U., Lee, J., Ko, M., Lee, C., Kim, Y., Yang, S., Yatani, K., Gweon, G., Chung, K.M., & Song, J. (2014). Hooked on smartphones: An exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (p. 2327-2336). ACM.Google Scholar
  41. Lennon, R.G. (2012). Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) with cloud 4 education. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Systems, Programming, And Applications: Software for Humanity (p. 171–180). ACM.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181. Scholar
  43. MacCallum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk (2014). Factors impacting teachers’ adoption of mobile learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 141–162.Google Scholar
  44. Mckercher Gillies, C. G. (2016). To BYOD or not to BYOD: Factors affecting academic acceptance of student mobile devices in the classroom. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 30357. Scholar
  45. O'Bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15–25. Scholar
  46. Ossorio, P. G. (2006). The behavior of persons: The collected works of Peter G. Ossorio (Vol. 5). Ann Arbor, MI: Descriptive Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  47. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084–1091. Scholar
  48. Pearson, C., & Hussain, Z. (2016). Smartphone use, addiction, narcissism, and personality: A mixed methods investigation. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 5(1), 17–32. Scholar
  49. Poushter, J. (2016). Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  50. Raths, J. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching beliefs. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(1) Accessed 02 August 2018.
  51. Palmer Research (2013). Best practices for enabling BYOD in education. Palmer Research White Paper.Google Scholar
  52. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2, 102–119.Google Scholar
  53. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. Scholar
  54. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., Weller, M., & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating pedagogy 2014: Open University innovation report 3. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  55. Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(1), 37–48. Scholar
  56. Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners (pp. 7–35). Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): United Nations Educational.Google Scholar
  57. Song, Y. (2014). Bring your own device (BYOD) for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60. Scholar
  58. Stavert, B. (2013). Bring your own device (BYOD) in schools: 2013 literature review. Eveleigh: NSW Department of Education and Communities.Google Scholar
  59. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312. Scholar
  60. Thomas, K. M., O’Bannon, B. W., & Bolton, N. (2013). Cell phones in the classroom: Teachers’ perspectives of inclusion, benefits, and barriers. Computers in the Schools, 30(4), 295–308. Scholar
  61. Vasant, S., & Mehta, B. (2015). A case study: Embedding ICT for effective classroom teaching & learning. In Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future-Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India (CSI) Volume 1 (p. 541-547). Springer international publishing.
  62. Wang, Α. Ι. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227. Scholar
  63. Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. Scholar
  64. WSSDA. (2014). How is technology in the classroom defined? Bring your own device. WSSDA Research Blast: Technology in the Classroom.Google Scholar
  65. Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos Livas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ioannis Katsanakis
    • 1
  • Eleni Vayia
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece
  2. 2.Open University of CyprusLatsiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations