Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 219–230 | Cite as

Assistive tool for constructing knowledge structures and suggesting related study materials links

  • Athitaya Nitchot
  • Wiphada Wettayaprasit
  • Lester Gilbert
Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

This research proposes a Web-based system for constructing knowledge structures and suggesting study materials links. Within Web-based learning, it is still difficult for learners to identify and choose study materials that match their current and desired abilities. In addition, learners may fail to recognize missing prerequisite learning, and may fail to identify the knowledge they seek. Most e-learning systems do not provide the information needed to assist learners and avoid these difficulties. We propose pedagogically-informed knowledge structures and associated applications, including a tool for designing and building such structures, a tool for navigating the structures for particular purposes (e.g., identifying knowledge missing from learners’ existing knowledge), and a tool for recommending appropriate materials. In this research the knowledge structures are derived from the subject matter within a targeted knowledge domain using task analysis. In this paper, a method of constructing a knowledge structure is proposed. An experimental study investigated users’ design and use of a knowledge structure. Learners will be expected to gain significantly higher levels of achievement by using the knowledge structures and associated tools proposed in this research, and educational communities will be able to share the knowledge structures and use the tools to support learners.

Keywords

Knowledge representation Web-based learning Knowledge structure Visualization Self-study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Thailand Research Fund under contract number MRG5980096.

References

  1. Chiou, C.-C., Lee, L.-T., & Liu, Y.-Q. (2012). Effect of Novak colorful concept map with digital teaching materials on student academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64(0), 192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chu, K.-K., Lee, C.-I., & Tsai, R.-S. (2011). Ontology technology to assist learners’ navigation in the concept map learning system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11293–11299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D'Antoni, A. V., Zipp, G. P., Olson, V. G., & Cahill, T. F. (2010). Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Medical Education, 10(1), 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellson, J., Gansner, E. R., Koutsofios, E., North, S. C., & Woodhull, G. (2004). Graphviz and Dynagraph-static and dynamic graph drawing tools. In M. Junger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph Drawing Software (pp. 127–148). Berlin/Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  5. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.  https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fry, G. W., & Bi, H. (2013). The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: The Thai educational paradox. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 290–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert, L., & Gale, V. (2008). Principles of E-learning systems engineering.Google Scholar
  8. Guarino, N. (1995). Formal ontology in conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5–6), 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., & Albert, D. (2006). Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
  10. Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Albert, D., & Steiner, C. (2006). Lifelong Competence Development: On the Advantages of Formal Competence-Performance Modeling. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, TENCompetence Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  11. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2007). Implementing the four levels: a practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs (1 ed.): San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kohlhase, M. (2000). OMDoc: Towards an Internet standards for mathematical knowledge. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Computation (AISC'2000).Google Scholar
  13. Levesque, H. J. (1986). Knowledge representation and reasoning. Annual Review of Computer Science, 1, 255–287.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Lally, A., Shen, R., Fox, E., & Cassel, L. N. (2003). Convergence of knowledge management and E-learning: the GetSmart experience. Paper presented at the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Mechai, V. (2012). Putting life and innovation into education: the Bamboo School in Thailand. Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  16. Melis, E., Budenbender, J., Goguadze, G., Libbrecht, P., & Ullrich, C. (2003). Knowledge representation and management in ACTIVEMATH. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 38(1–3), 47–64.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendes, M. E. S., Martinez, E., & Sacks, L. (2002). Knowledge-based Content Navigation in e-Learning Applications. Paper presented at the London Communications Symposium (LCS'02).Google Scholar
  18. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional design theory. New Jersey: Educational Technology PublicationGoogle Scholar
  19. Nachmanson, L. (2015). Microsoft Automatic Graph Layout. Retrieved 22/7/2015, from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/msagl/
  20. Nitchot, A., Gilbert, L., & Wills, G. (2011). Designing a competence structure to generate learning paths and assessment questions for self-study.Google Scholar
  21. Saiyasombut, S., & Siam Voices (2012). Thai education failures – Part 3: PISA scores & a challenge for the 21st century. Retrieved 11/10/1012, from http://asiancorrespondent.com/77060/thai-education-failures-part-3-pisa-scores-and-a-challenge-for-the-21st-century/
  22. Shaw, R.-S. (2010). A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps. Computers & Education, 54(1), 253–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations: Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  24. Yang, B., & Sun, Y. (2013). An exploration of link-based knowledge map in academic web space. Scientometrics, 96(1), 239–253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0919-y.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prince of Songkla University International College (PSUIC), Prince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  2. 2.Electronics and Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations