Remodeling the educational usage of Facebook in smart-mobile age
Overwhelming popularity of Facebook as a social network site (SNS), especially among students, has shown growing interests of using it as a tool for education in and out of the classroom. However, despite concerted efforts from educationists, Facebook has hitherto unincorporated as a promising pedagogical tool. Influencing factors for such a use has already modeled structurally and validated, yet, the “increasing smart mobile usage to access Facebook” and its interactivity received insufficient attention in those models. Hence, our aim was to extend the existing structural model for two factors, namely mobility and interactivity. The structural equation modeling was applied to identify factors including mobility and its interactivity that may stimulate students to adopt Facebook for educational purposes. Online survey data were gathered from a sample of 510 undergraduate students using a structured and adapted questionnaire. Results of the present study revealed that in the extended model educational usage of Facebook was significantly related to its purpose and less significant to its adoption. Mobility was a significant factor in predicting the adoption in the extended model, even more than the social influence, while interactivity is significantly affecting the educational usage of Facebook. The extended model reconfirms the purpose of using Facebook is mainly for social relations. Similarly, community identification is the most significant factor for Facebook adoption and mobility seems to be further improving it. In conclusion, incorporating mobility and interactivity into the already existing model can better explain the pedagogical use of Facebook in the smart mobile age.
KeywordsFacebook Higher education Social media Educational tools
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alhazmi, A. K., & Rahman, A. A. (2013). Facebook in higher education: Students' use and perceptions. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 5(15), 32–41.Google Scholar
- Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2011). Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 943-947), Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.174.
- Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models (Vol. 154). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.Google Scholar
- Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2014). Teacher-Student Relationship in the Facebook Era. The Evolution of the Internet in the Business Sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145–147). IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Fox, R. J. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. In John Wiley & Sons ltd.Google Scholar
- Gabarre, S., Gabarre, C., Din, R., Shah, P. M., & Karim, A. A. (2013). Using mobile Facebook as an LMS: Exploring impeding factors. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(3), 99–115.Google Scholar
- Gebauer, J. (2008). User requirements of mobile technology: A summary of research results. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 7(1,2), 101–119.Google Scholar
- Gliem, J. A., & Rosemary, G. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, (pp. 82-88).Google Scholar
- Karpinski, A. C., & Duberstein, A. (2009). A description of Facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Calif: San Diego.Google Scholar
- Kent, M. (2013). Changing the conversation: Facebook as a venue for online class discussion in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 546–565.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. Y. (2016). Digital Dividents overview-world development report. Washington: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
- Kwon, H. S. (2000 January). A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 7–15). Hawaii : IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926607
- Lim, T. (2010). The use of Facebook for online discussions among distance learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 72–81.Google Scholar
- Naidu, S. (2005). Learning & teaching with technology: Principles and practices. In Psychology press.Google Scholar
- Nowak, M., & Spiller, G. (2017, June 27). Two billion people coming together on Facebook. Retrieved from Facebook newsroom: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/06/two-billion-people-coming-together-on-facebook/
- Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011 Jan). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 937-942). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.173.
- Perry, D. (2003). Handheld computers in schools. ICT Research: Becta.Google Scholar
- Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance learning in higher education: A case study using Facebook. International Conference on IEEE In System Sciences (HICSS), (pp. 1–10). Hawai. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.479.
- Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002.Google Scholar
- Roth, A. (2009). Following Plato’s advice: Pedagogy and technology for the Facebook generation. Journal of Philosophy and History of Education, 59(1), 125–128.Google Scholar
- Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005, October). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In Proceedings of mLearn (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
- Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
- Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.Google Scholar
- Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(4), 1–8.Google Scholar