Autophagy inhibition improves the chemotherapeutic efficacy of cruciferous vegetable-derived diindolymethane in a murine prostate cancer xenograft model

  • Hossam Draz
  • Alexander A. Goldberg
  • Emma S. Tomlinson Guns
  • Ladan Fazli
  • Stephen Safe
  • J. Thomas Sanderson
SHORT REPORT

Summary

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in North America and there is an urgent need for development of more effective therapeutic treatments against this disease. We have recently shown that diindolylmethane (DIM) and several of its halogenated derivatives (ring-DIMs) induce death and protective autophagy in human prostate cancer cells. However, the in vivo efficacy of ring-DIMs and the use of autophagy inhibitors as adjuvant therapy have not yet been studied in vivo. The objective of this study was to determine these effects on tumor growth in nude CD-1 mice bearing bioluminescent androgen-independent PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. We found that chloroquine (CQ) significantly sensitized PC-3 cells to death in the presence of sub-toxic concentrations of DIM or 4,4'-Br2DIM in vitro. Moreover, a combination of DIM (10 mg/kg) and CQ (60 mg/kg), 3× per week, significantly decreased PC-3 tumor growth in vivo after 3 and 4 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, 4,4'-Br2DIM at 10 mg/kg (3× per week) significantly inhibited tumour growth after 4 weeks of treatment. Tissues microarray analysis showed that DIM alone or combined with CQ induced apoptosis marker TUNEL; the combination also significantly inhibited the cell proliferation marker Ki67. In conclusion, we have confirmed that DIM and 4,4'-Br2DIM are effective agents against prostate cancer in vivo and shown that inhibition of autophagy with CQ enhances the anticancer efficacy of DIM. Our results suggest that including selective autophagy inhibitors as adjuvants may improve the efficacy of existing and novel drug therapies against prostate cancer.

Keywords

Prostate cancer PC-3 CD-1 nude mice Autophagy Diindolylmethane Ring-DIMs 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Hossam Draz, Alexander Goldberg, Emma Guns, Ladan Fazli, Stephen Safe and Thomas Sanderson each declare to have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Centre National de Biologie Expérimentale where the studies were conducted. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim MK, Park JH (2009) Conference on “multidisciplinary approaches to nutritional problems”. Symposium on "nutrition and health". Cruciferous vegetable intake and the risk of human cancer: epidemiological evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 68(1):103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665108008884 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Kruif CA, Marsman JW, Venekamp JC, Falke HE, Noordhoek J, Blaauboer BJ, Wortelboer HM (1991) Structure elucidation of acid reaction products of indole-3-carbinol: detection in vivo and enzyme induction in vitro. Chem Biol Interact 80(3):303–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banerjee S, Kong D, Wang Z, Bao B, Hillman GG, Sarkar FH (2011) Attenuation of multi-targeted proliferation-linked signaling by 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM): from bench to clinic. Mutat Res 728(1–2):47–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.06.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fares F, Azzam N, Appel B, Fares B, Stein A (2010) The potential efficacy of 3,3′-diindolylmethane in prevention of prostate cancer development. Eur J Cancer Prev 19(3):199–203.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328333fbce CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg AA, Titorenko VI, Beach A, Abdelbaqi K, Safe S, Sanderson JT (2014) Ring-substituted analogs of 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM) induce apoptosis and necrosis in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cells. Investig New Drugs 32(1):25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-013-9979-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Le HT, Schaldach CM, Firestone GL, Bjeldanes LF (2003) Plant-derived 3,3′-Diindolylmethane is a strong androgen antagonist in human prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 278(23):21136–21145.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300588200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Sukamporn P, Zhang S, Min KW, Baek SJ (2017) 3,3′-diindolylmethane downregulates cyclin D1 through triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress in colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep 38(1):569–574.  https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cho HJ, Park SY, Kim EJ, Kim JK, Park JH (2011) 3,3′-Diindolylmethane inhibits prostate cancer development in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate model. Mol Carcinog 50(2):100–112.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.20698 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh-Gupta V, Banerjee S, Yunker CK, Rakowski JT, Joiner MC, Konski AA, Sarkar FH, Hillman GG (2012) B-DIM impairs radiation-induced survival pathways independently of androgen receptor expression and augments radiation efficacy in prostate cancer. Cancer Lett 318(1):86–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu TY, Khor TO, Su ZY, Saw CL, Shu L, Cheung KL, Huang Y, Yu S, Kong AN (2013) Epigenetic modifications of Nrf2 by 3,3′-diindolylmethane in vitro in TRAMP C1 cell line and in vivo TRAMP prostate tumors. AAPS J 15(3):864–874.  https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-013-9493-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blackadar CB (2016) Historical review of the causes of cancer. World J Clin Oncol 7(1):54–86.  https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.54 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White E (2015) The role for autophagy in cancer. J Clin Invest 125(1):42–46.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73941 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang SY, Winslet MC (2011) Dual role of autophagy in colon cancer cell survival. Ann Surg Oncol 18(Suppl 3):S239.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1789-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen S, Rehman SK, Zhang W, Wen A, Yao L, Zhang J (2010) Autophagy is a therapeutic target in anticancer drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1806(2):220–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.07.003 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A (2017) Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17(9):528–542.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.53 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorin S, Hamai A, Mehrpour M, Codogno P (2013) Autophagy regulation and its role in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 23(5):361–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.06.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou H, Yuan M, Yu Q, Zhou X, Min W, Gao D (2016) Autophagy regulation and its role in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Cancer Biomark 17(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-160613 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldberg AA, Draz H, Montes-Grajales D, Olivero-Verbel J, Safe SH, Sanderson JT (2015) 3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) and its ring-substituted halogenated analogs (ring-DIMs) induce differential mechanisms of survival and death in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cells. Genes Cancer 6(5–6):265–280PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Draz H, Goldberg AA, Titorenko VI, Tomlinson Guns ES, Safe SH, Sanderson JT (2017) Diindolylmethane and its halogenated derivatives induce protective autophagy in human prostate cancer cells via induction of the oncogenic protein AEG-1 and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Cell Signal 40:172–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nachshon-Kedmi M, Fares FA, Yannai S (2004) Therapeutic activity of 3,3′-diindolylmethane on prostate cancer in an in vivo model. Prostate 61(2):153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen D, Banerjee S, Cui QC, Kong D, Sarkar FH, Dou QP (2012) Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by 3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is associated with human prostate cancer cell death in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One 7(10):e47186.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047186 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parzych KR, Klionsky DJ (2014) An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 20(3):460–473.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5371 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen N, Karantza-Wadsworth V (2009) Role and regulation of autophagy in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1793(9):1516–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.12.013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muilenburg D, Parsons C, Coates J, Virudachalam S, Bold RJ (2014) Role of autophagy in apoptotic regulation by Akt in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 34(2):631–637PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zheng N, Zhang P, Huang H, Liu W, Hayashi T, Zang L, Zhang Y, Liu L, Xia M, Tashiro S, Onodera S, Ikejima T (2015) ERalpha down-regulation plays a key role in silibinin-induced autophagy and apoptosis in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J Pharmacol Sci 128(3):97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2015.05.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen Y, Sawyers CL, Scher HI (2008) Targeting the androgen receptor pathway in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8(4):440–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vyas AR, Hahm ER, Arlotti JA, Watkins S, Stolz DB, Desai D, Amin S, Singh SV (2013) Chemoprevention of prostate cancer by d,l-sulforaphane is augmented by pharmacological inhibition of autophagy. Cancer Res 73(19):5985–5995.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0755 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRS-Institut Armand-FrappierLavalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry, National Research CentreCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Vancouver Prostate CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Veterinary Physiology and PharmacologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations