Advertisement

Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

  • Lee-Lee Lai
  • Shireene Ratna VethakkanEmail author
  • Nik Raihan Nik Mustapha
  • Sanjiv Mahadeva
  • Wah-Kheong ChanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background and Aims

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a novel class of drugs that lower glucose by inducing renal glycosuria. We aimed to explore whether SGLT2 inhibitor added to the usual care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) will benefit NASH histology.

Methods

In this investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, pilot study, nine biopsy-proven NASH patients with T2DM were given empagliflozin 25 mg daily for 24 weeks. Liver biopsy was repeated at the end of treatment. The histological outcomes were compared with the placebo group of a previous 48-week clinical trial.

Results

There was a significant reduction in body mass index (median change, Δ = −0.7 kg per m2, p = 0.011), waist circumference (Δ = −3 cm, p = 0.033), systolic blood pressure (Δ = −9 mmHg, p = 0.024), diastolic blood pressure (Δ = −6 mmHg, p = 0.033), fasting blood glucose (Δ = −1.7 mmol/L, p = 0.008), total cholesterol (Δ = −0.5 mmol/L, p = 0.011), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (Δ = −19 U/L, p = 0.013), volumetric liver fat fraction (Δ = −7.8%, p = 0.017), steatosis (Δ = −1, p = 0.014), ballooning (Δ = −1, p = 0.034), and fibrosis (Δ = 0, p = 0.046). All histological components either remained unchanged or improved, except in one patient who had worsening ballooning. Empagliflozin resulted in significantly greater improvements in steatosis (67% vs. 26%, p = 0.025), ballooning (78% vs. 34%, p = 0.024), and fibrosis (44% vs. 6%, p = 0.008) compared with historical placebo.

Conclusion

This pilot study provides primary histological evidence that empagliflozin may be useful for the treatment of NASH. This preliminary finding should prompt larger clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of empagliflozin and other SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of NASH in T2DM patients.

Trial registry number ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT02964715.

Keywords

SGLT2 Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 Jardiance NASH NAFLD 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Wan Nur Illyana Wan Yusoff, Wan Noor Hidayu, Talvant Kaur, and Soudamany Nair, for their assistance in the research project.

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Malaya Special Research Fund (Project No.: BK006-2016 and BKS067-2017). University of Malaya was not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10620_2019_5477_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1804 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM2_ESM.docx (2 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 2064 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM3_ESM.docx (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 1853 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM4_ESM.docx (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 1565 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM5_ESM.docx (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 2253 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM6_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 2321 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM7_ESM.docx (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 7 (DOCX 2233 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM8_ESM.docx (2.5 mb)
Supplementary material 8 (DOCX 2571 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM9_ESM.docx (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 9 (DOCX 2188 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM10_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 10 (DOCX 12 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM11_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 11 (DOCX 12 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM12_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 12 (DOCX 12 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM13_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 13 (DOCX 13 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM14_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 14 (DOCX 15 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM15_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 15 (DOCX 13 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM16_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 16 (DOCX 15 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM17_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 17 (DOCX 13 kb)
10620_2019_5477_MOESM18_ESM.tif (1.3 mb)
Supplementary Figure 1 The histological outcomes of patients who received empagliflozin 25 mg daily for 24 weeks compared with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the placebo group of a 48-week clinical trial previously conducted at the same center (TIFF 1374 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan WK, Tan AT, Vethakkan SR, Tah PC, Vijayananthan A, Goh KL. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in diabetics—prevalence and predictive factors in a multiracial hospital clinic population in Malaysia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1375–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cusi K. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current approaches and future directions. Diabetologia. 2016;59:1112–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011;43:617–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armstrong MJ, Gaunt P, Aithal GP, et al. Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet. 2016;387:679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerich JE. Role of the kidney in normal glucose homeostasis and in the hyperglycaemia of diabetes mellitus: therapeutic implications. Diabet Med. 2010;27:136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mudaliar S, Alloju S, Henry RR. Can a shift in fuel energetics explain the beneficial cardiorenal outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study? A unifying hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdul-Ghani M, Del Prato S, Chilton R, DeFronzo RA. SGLT2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: lessons learned from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan WK, Nik Mustapha NR, Mahadeva S. Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1470–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoneda M, Yoneda M, Fujita K, et al. Transient elastography in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Gut. 2007;56:1330–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012;55:2005–2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anuurad E, Shiwaku K, Nogi A, et al. The new BMI criteria for asians by the regional office for the western pacific region of WHO are suitable for screening of overweight to prevent metabolic syndrome in elder Japanese workers. J Occup Health. 2003;45:335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J, Group IDFETFC. The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    St Pierre TG, House MJ, Bangma SJ, et al. Stereological analysis of liver biopsy histology sections as a reference standard for validating non-invasive liver fat fraction measurements by MRI. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Francque S, et al. Elafibranor, an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -delta, induces resolution of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without fibrosis worsening. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1147e1145–1159e1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wah Kheong C, Nik Mustapha NR, Mahadeva S. A randomized trial of silymarin for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1940e1948–1949e1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tahara A, Kurosaki E, Yokono M, et al. Effects of SGLT2 selective inhibitor ipragliflozin on hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and obesity in type 2 diabetic mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;715:246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiang S, Nakatsu Y, Seno Y, et al. Treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a rodent model with diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015;7:104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang L, Wu Y, Tian M, et al. Dapagliflozin slows the progression of the renal and liver fibrosis associated with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017;313:E563–E576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jojima T, Tomotsune T, Iijima T, Akimoto K, Suzuki K, Aso Y. Empagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor), alone or in combination with linagliptin (a DPP-4 inhibitor), prevents steatohepatitis in a novel mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016;8:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: a “Thrifty Substrate” hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1108–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee PCH, Gu Y, Yeung MY, et al. Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin ameliorate hepatic dysfunction among chinese subjects with diabetes in part through glycemic improvement: a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9:285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seko Y, Sumida Y, Sasaki K, et al. Effects of canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, on hepatic function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled and subgroup analyses of clinical trials. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leiter LA, Forst T, Polidori D, Balis DA, Xie J, Sha S. Effect of canagliflozin on liver function tests in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2016;42:25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The spontaneous course of liver enzymes and its correlation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1925–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wong VW, Wong GL, Tsang SW, et al. Metabolic and histological features of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with different serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Takeda A, Irahara A, Nakano A, et al. The improvement of the hepatic histological findings in a patient with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with type 2 diabetes after the administration of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ipragliflozin. Intern Med. 2017;56:2739–2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Akuta N, Watanabe C, Kawamura Y, et al. Effects of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease complicated by diabetes mellitus: Preliminary prospective study based on serial liver biopsies. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1:46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuchay MS, Krishan S, Mishra SK, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on liver fat in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial (E-LIFT trial). Diabetes Care. 2018;41:1801–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee-Lee Lai
    • 1
  • Shireene Ratna Vethakkan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nik Raihan Nik Mustapha
    • 3
  • Sanjiv Mahadeva
    • 1
  • Wah-Kheong Chan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of PathologyHospital Sultanah BahiyahAlor SetarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations