Advertisement

Concise Commentary: Second Line Is Not Second Best—Continuing Validity of the Oxford Criteria in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

  • Pauline Rivière
  • David Laharie
  • Philippe MarteauEmail author
Concise Commentary
  • 122 Downloads

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), as the most lethal complication of inflammatory bowel disease, often necessitates referral of patients to specialized centers staffed with trained medical and surgical teams [1]. First-line therapy is intravenous (IV) steroids, justified by over 50 years of experience that has documented the induction of clinical remission in ~ 65% of cases [2]. Cyclosporine or infliximab, used as second-line therapy, is effective in the setting of steroid resistance [3]. If the disease does not respond to this second-line therapy or at any time when peritoneal symptoms are manifest, colectomy is indicated. Surgery is also often indicated in initial responders if the disease relapses after a short period of time; ~ 20–30% of relapsers require colectomy at 1 year [4]. Until now, modifying the infusion schedule or doses has not been associated with significant improvement [5].

Timely decision making is essential to therapeutic decision making, i.e., using first-line or second-line medical treatments or referring the patient for surgery [1, 2]. Travis et al. showed in 1996 (at a time when second-line therapy was not used) that bowel movement frequency > 8/day and C-reactive protein > 45 mg/l after 3 days of steroids were factors that accurately predicted colectomy risk [6]. These “Oxford criteria” have been used since then, with the modification that second-line therapy is recommended when steroids fail at treatment day 3 [6].

The study by Moore and Bressler published in this issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences evaluated the predictive value of the Oxford criteria in patients with ASUC who received second-line therapy when needed (infliximab except for one patient who received cyclosporine and vedolizumab) [7]. The authors retrospectively collected 80 patients with ASUC treated with IV steroids, comparing the colectomy rate according to the presence or absence of Oxford criteria. Patients fulfilling the Oxford criteria had a higher risk of colectomy during hospital admission (12/33 [36%] vs. 4/41 of those who did not meet the criteria [10%], p = 0.009). This article thus confirms that the Oxford criteria are still relevant to the modern management of ASUC. Furthermore, it shows (and this is what we should tell our patients) that when these criteria are used in real-life conditions, the risk of colectomy is one-third during hospital admission and 45% in the first 90 days. Of course, larger series from different centers may improve the precision of these data although they seem to reflect what is commonly observed in daily practice. Informing patients with ASUC of these risks should help better inform patients and help them to be better prepared regarding the decision of surgery.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ordás I, Domènech E, Mañosa M, et al. Post-operative morbidity and mortality of a cohort of steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: nationwide multicenter study of the GETECCU ENEIDA Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, et al. Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laharie D, Bourreille A, Branche J, et al. Ciclosporin versus infliximab in patients with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids: a parallel, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;380:1909–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laharie D, Bourreille A, Branche J, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with steroid-refractory acute severe UC treated with ciclosporin or infliximab. Gut. 2018;67:237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sebastian S, Myers S, Nadir S, Subramanian S. Systematic review: efficacy and safety of accelerated induction regimes in infliximab rescue therapy for hospitalized patients with acute severe colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:1119–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Travis SP, Farrant JM, Ricketts C, et al. Predicting outcome in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1996;38:905–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore AC, Bressler B. Acute severe ulcerative colitis: the Oxford criteria no longer predict in-hospital colectomy rates. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05668-6.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline Rivière
    • 1
  • David Laharie
    • 1
  • Philippe Marteau
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive OncologyHaut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
  2. 2.Sorbonne Université - INSERM-ERL 1157, CHU Saint-Antoine 27 - UMR7203 – Saint Antoine IBD NetworkAPHP, Hôpital Saint AntoineParisFrance
  3. 3.Hepatology and GastroenterologyHôpital Saint AntoineParisFrance

Personalised recommendations