Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 64, Issue 10, pp 2706–2708 | Cite as

DDS Perspective: Reflections of a Woman in Gastroenterology

  • Sonia FriedmanEmail author


When I finished my gastroenterology fellowship in 1999, only about 10% of the gastroenterologic (GI) attending physicians were women [1]. I always considered that an advantage, not an obstacle. At least 50% of GI patients are women, and women prefer female endoscopists [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. I quickly realized that as a recent female GI graduate, I might have better career opportunities than my male colleagues. In 1999, multiple GI practices were recruiting women because that is what their patients demanded [2, 3, 4]. While there were long waiting lists to see the sole female endoscopist in a given practice, many male endoscopists were searching for patients. In general, women feel more comfortable talking about gas, bloating, diarrhea, pelvic pain, and menstrual symptoms with other women. I have heard male senior gastroenterologists say that only female gastroenterologists should care for female patients. Yet by relegating “women’s GI issues” to women physicians, the medical establishment diminishes not only female patients and their problems, but also the science behind the practice of medicine. A scientific approach to illness accounts for differences among all people and respects all patients regardless of gender.

Women gastroenterologists should have been equally compensated, but that was far from the case in 1999 and the early 2000s. Like the US women’s soccer team members who are widely popular and have gained world recognition with multiple stunning victories but are paid a pittance compared with the US men’s soccer team, women gastroenterologists have been consistently undervalued and undercompensated. Although I was specifically recruited as an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) expert and not a specialist in women’s health (which was not thought to be a legitimate field at the time), my starting salary was significantly less than that of my young male colleagues. One job offer in New York City that I did not take was for a year or two “until I got pregnant and was on the mommy track.” Such assumptions were disheartening after I had trained for 3 intense years at Mount Sinai, one of the best GI programs in the country. My male GI colleagues also became parents, but the powers that be assumed their wives would handle the home front. In 2017, 17.7% of the female practicing gastroenterologists were women, and US GI fellowships in 2017/2018 were training 32% women [1]. Although improved since 1999, women in GI still have a long way to go to attain greater numbers of professorships and positions as division chiefs and society presidents. When they negotiate salary and clinical and research support, women GIs should remember that they are more in demand than their male peers, since the 18% of female GI physicians are servicing most of the female patients.

Women’s Health

I am proud to focus much of my clinical and research interests in IBD and women’s health. I have always enjoyed treating pregnant IBD patients, as well as those struggling with infertility. A large part of my success and satisfaction in managing these patients is that I always have outstanding backup from colleagues in maternal–fetal medicine and infertility. We almost always manage patients as a team, and team members are both male and female physicians. This gender mix somehow legitimizes our clinical and research endeavors to colleagues inside and outside Brigham and Women’s Hospital. It says to the outside world that since male physicians are interested in women’s health, it must be important! I have often seen male gastroenterologists send their pregnant patients to their female colleagues. Yet the highest incidence of IBD is during the reproductive years, so treating pregnant women is not a sideline, but at the center of an IBD practice. One of my goals is to teach community and academic gastroenterologists how to manage pregnant IBD patients so that they will feel comfortable treating them. I was proud to be part of the Parenthood Project, a national committee that developed guidelines for caring for pregnant patients with IBD [7].

Sexual Function and Men’s Health

Recently, our group has been doing research on sexual dysfunction in women and men with IBD [8, 9, 10]. With this research thread in IBD, it seems much easier to interest all IBD gastroenterologists, including men. Our sexual function research has taken off with a few prospective clinical trials by various investigators throughout the USA. My research in sexual dysfunction and fertility in IBD has inspired me to focus my current studies on men’s health in IBD. The premise is that sperm take 70–90 days to develop and, during that time, are susceptible to drug or environmental toxicities. Recent studies have shown that paternal preconception exposures are critically important to child health. For example, paternal smoking, age, and occupational chemical exposures have been linked to an increased risk of cancer and neurologic disorders in children, presumably through epigenetic modifications in the germ line. The newly understood importance of paternal influences has important implications for men with IBD. Fathers are exposed to IBD medications as well as active inflammation around the time of conception, and this may have an effect on child health outcomes [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In fact, the effect on the fetus from the father may be equal to or greater than that from the mother. Imagine telling fathers that they cannot smoke or drink coffee prior to conceiving and that they should be in good health and of normal weight!


Salaries at Brigham and Women’s Hospital are now equitable, and there is a set salary structure that is not gender-biased. We boast a GI program that has among the most female faculty in the USA. My colleagues, both male and female, are wonderful. My chief and clinical chief were smart and hired lots of young, bright, and eager young women as new attendings over the years. There is a hospital parental leave policy for faculty that is fair by US standards, and many men and women GIs have taken advantage of it. My colleagues are among the highlights of my job, and I enjoy working with all of them. I see so many male and female colleagues struggling with the responsibilities of raising young children. Trusted childcare is exorbitantly priced and difficult to arrange, and living in the Boston area is prohibitively expensive. It is difficult to have a full-time clinical job, do the expected amount of clinical research, and have a successful life with a partner, even without children thrown into the mix. My most successful colleagues either do not have children or have parents who do the childcare or a partner who has a much less time-intensive job.


When our son Sam was an infant, he would only sleep for an hour at a time and awaken consistently at 3:30 AM, ready to go. My husband Jerry, who is a pulmonary and critical care physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and I were tired all of the time. It was difficult to make it through our clinical day, much less write chapters, and do research. One of my most poignant memories is driving around the Chestnut Hill Reservoir with Sam in his car seat so that, while he napped, Jerry and I could write our chapters in the car: I was writing the IBD chapter for Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, while Jerry was writing a chapter on hemoptysis and alveolar hemorrhage for the Intensive Care Unit Manual. We would then repeat the process again and again so we could get work done. Sam is now 20, and we also have a 17-year-old daughter, Angela. Somehow, both want to go into medicine. Dr. Richard Blumberg and I have just finished our sixth iteration of the Harrison’s IBD chapter [17]. I am lucky in that Jerry and I have always shared household and childcare responsibilities. I can only hope that I have supported him as much as he has supported me over our 23 years together.

Patients and Complications

About 70–80% of my patients are women, a population I have always been happy to treat. Few patients have called me by my first name without asking or acted disrespectfully because I am a woman. I think confidence in one’s own clinical skills usually overcomes other people’s gender bias. Overall, my patients appreciate having a physician who listens attentively and seems comfortable discussing personal questions regarding sexual function, mental health, and overall general well-being [18, 19, 20]. Additionally, patients appreciate it when I tell them I need to research a treatment or think about a plan rather than give them a quick answer. However, when mistakes are made, or confidence breaks down, the result can be worse for a female than a male physician. Although women physicians are sued less [21], I feel they agonize more about mistakes and tend to blame themselves rather than circumstances. Some of my most stressful days have resulted from the personal consequences of complications. I have seen several young female gastroenterologists leave medicine due to complications early on in their careers. I now view the increased empathy and attention to detail of female physicians as a double-edged sword. We blame ourselves more after a complication occurs, and the guilt and self-doubt can linger for a long time. Perhaps this is why a wellness survey at our hospital reported decreased professional fulfillment and increased burnout among female faculty. Problem areas were difficulty with academic advancement, lack of respect, and insufficient work flexibility [22].

Final Thoughts for Women GIs

Overall, I think female gastroenterologists need to understand that they are essential to an outstanding GI program and start demanding working conditions and pay commensurate with their unique talents and expert clinical practice. Female GIs are a sought-after minority and therefore have superior bargaining power. An increased number of female gastroenterologists will only improve clinical care for both female and male patients. Female physicians engage in more patient-centered communication and have longer visits than their male colleagues, with no change in the quality or manner of medical advice [19]. This communication style inspires increased patient engagement, comfort, and partnership [19] and is an important move away from the ever-increasing corporatization of medicine.



  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Menees SB, Inadomi JM, Korsnes S, Elta GH. Women patients’ preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Varadarajulu S, Petruff C, Ramsey W. Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:170–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah DK, Karasek V, Gerkin RD, Ramirez FC, Young MA. Sex preferences for colonoscopists and GI physicians among patients and health care professionals. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saunders BP, Halligan S, Jobling C, Moussa ME, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA, et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:778–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahadevan U, Robinson C, Bernasko N, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in pregnancy clinical care pathway—a report from the American Gastroenterological Association IBD parenthood project working group. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1508–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Silva P, O’Toole A, Marc LG, et al. Development of a sexual dysfunction scale for women with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:2350–2359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Toole A, De Silva P, Mark L, et al. Sexual function in men with IBD-an IBD-specific scale. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman S, Magnussen B, O’Toole A, Fedder J, Larsen M, Nørgård BM. Increased use of medications for erectile dysfunction in men with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease compared to men without inflammatory bowel disease—a nationwide cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braun JM, Messerlian C, Hauser R. Fathers matter: why it’s time to consider the impact of paternal environmental exposures on children’s health. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017;4:46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soubry A, Hoyo C, Jirtle RL, et al. A paternal environmental legacy: evidence for epigenetic inheritance through the male germ line. Bioessays. 2014;36:359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodgers AB, Morgan CP, Leu NA, et al. Transgenerational epigenetic programming via sperm microRNA recapitulates effects of paternal stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:13699–13704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ng SF, Lin RC, Laybutt DR, et al. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature. 2010;467:963–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharma U, Conine CC, Shea JM, et al. Biogenesis and function of tRNA fragments during sperm maturation and fertilization in mammals. Science. 2016;351:391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fullston T, McPherson NO, Owens JA, et al. Paternal obesity induces metabolic and sperm disturbances in male offspring that are exacerbated by their exposure to an “obesogenic” diet. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory bowel disease. In: Longo Braunwald, Isselbacher Fauci, eds. Harrison’s Textbook of Internal Medicine, vol. II. Nineteenth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 2018.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bertakis KD, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Azari R, Robbins JA. The influence of gender on physician practice style. Med Care. 1995;33:407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I, Bestehorn KP, Böhm M, Krone W. Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care. J Intern Med. 2008;264:340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guardado JR. Policy Research Perspectives Medical Liability Claim Frequency Among U.S. Physicians. American Medical Association Closed Claims Comparative. 2016.Google Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and EndoscopyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations